![]() |
|||||||||
We will begin this sermon by turning to Matthew 17:10-13.
We are beginning at the same place where we left off in my previous sermon because I want to put the steps to properly understanding the "John-the Baptist/Elijah" connection as clearly as I can. I am going to go back to Malachi 4:5-6 and read those verses just to remind you what it says.
We will now go back to Matthew 17, and I want you to think about verse 13 once again.
I want to draw your attention to this because the verse indicates that the Jews in Jesus' day misunderstood Malachi 4:5-6, even as some of us have in our day. The Jews had many fanciful ideas that included Elijah himself being resurrected. That seemed to be the center of their belief regarding Elijah and the fulfillment of Malachi 4:5. They believed that Elijah himself would be resurrected.
Now there is a definite word in there. "Are you that prophet? (referring to Deuteronomy 18:15).
Two of those references to beings had the definite article before them—"the" and "that," pointing to a specific individual. When John replied, he knew in advance what they were thinking, because he knew what the Jews believed in regard to Elijah, and so he answered, "I am not Elijah." In other words, since he was preaching certain things and doing certain things, they expected that he would be Elijah, and so the definite article is left out. "No. I am not Elijah." The reason he answered that way is because there is a pretty good indication that at this particular time he did not know he was "the" Elijah of Malachi 4:5, and so he answered honestly the only way that he could. He answered, "No. I am not Elijah," because he knew what they believed, and so he answered to what they believed. He answered, "No. I am not the resurrected Elijah." We are going to back again to Matthew 17.
The question is asked by the disciples and it is in regard to what the scribes were saying, that Elijah—not the Elijah, but Elijah, the resurrected one—must first come. It was what the scribes believed that was under question, not the complete truth at this point in time, not the complete truth regarding Malachi 4:5-6.
Jesus responded to the disciples' question by essentially saying He agreed that the scribes were correct in saying "Elijah must first come before the Messiah appears, and before that great and dreadful day." The word "truly" is important to understanding His agreement with the scribes. He is saying they have correctly understood Malachi 4:5-6 to this point—the point being "Elijah must come first." He did not say He agreed with them totally, nor is He indicating that another Elijah is off in the future. Jesus stated verse 13 in the future tense, because that is the tense in which Malachi 4:5-6 is written. It is written in Malachi 4:5-6 as a promise to be fulfilled at some point later in time. He added to that a quote from the prophecy that is given of John. He is beginning to turn our attention away from Elijah to John, and so He quotes the prophecy concerning John in Luke 1:17. I am going to read that to you so you see absolutely that this was tied to John the Baptist.
Now why did Jesus refer to that verse in Luke 1:17? He was expanding on John the Baptist's responsibility. He summed it up in Matthew 17:11 by saying "restore all things." What does "all" refer to? It refers to all things necessary to prepare a people for the arrival of the Messiah the first time. This phrase "restore all things" appears no where else in any connection to the work of either Elijah or John the Baptist. What Jesus is doing here is giving us a clear understanding of the mission of John the Baptist. He has turned away from Elijah to John the Baptist. Why? Because He is going to make a connection between the two. John the Baptist's mission is that which he was sent to accomplish in his ministry.
It is right here in verse 12 that Jesus' disagreement with the scribes becomes clear. He agreed with them up to a point, and that point was "Elijah must come first." He signaled His disagreement by using the word "but." The word "but" is an adversative conjunction in that it joins two thoughts together, but is adversative in that it creates a difference, an exception. It is a signal that an exception is coming. It is a signal that a different thought is coming. His difference was with the scribes' interpretation. The word "but" means "on the other hand." It means "to the contrary." It means "except that." Its synonym is "however." Jesus was in no way saying that there will be a future Elijah beyond John the Baptist. He has simply reiterated what Malachi 4:5 says, adds "restore all things" to it, and then clearly states that this prophecy has already been fulfilled by John. He had already come, and they did not see him. They did not get it. They did to him whatever they wanted. Here they had "the Elijah" right in front of them—the fulfillment of prophecy—and they killed him! Now to take further what Jesus said, because He paraphrased the futuristic tense of Malachi 4:5-6, is to twist and add to what He said. All He said was, "This is what the prophecy says, and this is My disagreement with what the scribes say it says." John clearly came before "that great and dreadful day." The last biblical day—indeed the "last hour"—was already begun in the 90s AD as I John 2:18 states. Please understand, brethren, God does not perceive time in the way we do, and we are the ones that must adjust our thinking.
God does not look at time in the way we do. That one verse all by itself shows clearly that God's perception of time is different from ours, so do not be guilty of reading something into the scriptures that is not there. John restored all things necessary to the fulfilling of his mission, and his mission only. His mission was to prepare the way before the Messiah. His mission parallels Elijah's, and Elijah's mission was to reveal the true God to people who had lost their way. Elijah was a light in his day, and John too was a light, but he was not "the" Light. John clearly pointed to Jesus as the Messiah so that they could repent, even as Elijah was used to clearly differentiate the true God from the Baals so those people at that time could repent. Since John the Baptist's and Jesus' day, many have done similar restorative preaching, but not one of them was "the" Elijah of Malachi 4:5-6. If somebody in the future does restore his work, he will not be the Elijah either. Nobody ever will, because John the Baptist already filled that, and we have this on the authority of Jesus Christ. You cannot get higher authority than that. Jesus clearly said that John the Baptist was Elijah, and they killed him. We are going to make a turn from this, and we are going to go to Psalm 22. This is still going to be involving some things regarding prophecy.
One cannot look at this Psalm without clearly seeing parallels to Christ's crucifixion. This was something that David experienced, and then wrote upon his reflections, which actually became a prophecy of Christ's final hours. We are going to go to the book of Hosea and look at another one. That prophecy in Psalm 22 was pretty clear, but this one in Hosea is not so clear.
This particular prophecy is much more complex in its application. There is an element of prophecy that one has to be very careful about in attempting to interpret, and that is the principle of duality. Dual application indeed does exist, but at the same time it can be a lure, trapping one into a wrong interpretation, because God never intended every prophecy to have dual application. This one in Hosea 11:1-7 is one of those that is in some sense vague in its application to us today, but also within it are things said that I think one could very easily apply to certain situations that are extant today. As a matter fact, verse 1 says, "When Israel was a child, then I loved him, and called my son out of Egypt." Do you know that when Matthew wrote the book of Matthew, he used that verse as a proof that Jesus was the Christ? It is given in Matthew 2:15.
It obviously had application in Hosea's day, or for that period of time after that as well, but it also had application when Christ was born. Jesus was sent down in Egypt with his parents, Joseph and Mary, because they had to flee from the persecutions of Herod. And so whenever that Herod was dead, and the way was clear, the signal was given, and they came back from Egypt to their ancestral home in Nazareth. God shows a very legal and right scriptural dual application of Hosea 11:1. But let us expand out on that. He said, "When Israel was a child." Not Jesus; Israel. This was a prophecy that was given to the nation of Israel, directed at Ephraim, which is usually used as representing all of the tribes, but maybe most directly to Ephraim. It describes two very interesting thoughts. The first part of it is really tender, because it talks about God, how as a Father trained Ephraim (or Israel, as it were) from the time he was born. He taught him how to walk. That is what it means. "I took him by the arms and taught him how to walk." He is giving a very vague broad description of how He kept supplying whatever was needed for Israel in order to bring them to the greatness of a nation, and to grow from just a few people to a couple of million in Egypt, and who knows how many in the home of their ancestry in the land of Canaan. They then of course turned bad on Him, and they went into captivity. But we know what happened in between their captivity, and today Israel is once again formed. As a nation we do not know who we are, but at the same time I think that we would have to agree that once again God did His thing. He provided everything that was needed by the Israelitish people to once again walk as great among the nations. He has given the Israelitish people power over much of the earth. Once again we look at how history is repeating itself, and that is that Israel has gone bad. Now is verse 5 going to come to pass once again—"the Assyrian shall be his king"? It is very interesting to consider that. Is there dual application of this verse? We may readily agree. Maybe there is dual application, because we can see things at least vaguely forming, but we are not really sure about some of these things. Hosea wrote this about 40 years before Israel went into captivity to Assyria. So how much of this does apply to modern Israel, and to modern Assyria? Is Germany truly modern Assyria? There are some people with Church of God connections researching into this very thing, and are finding things that leads them to believe that Germany is actually part of the Ten Lost Tribes. Even back when Evelyn and I came into the church it was commonly talked of, that there was a very large percentage of Israelites in Germany, especially in the northern part of Germany. That was already clear even then. But how far can we go in the making of dual applications? I bring these questions up because I do want us to be cautious. I do agree thoroughly that there are dual applications that can be made, and that they can be true. The one thing I know for sure, that even though prophecy has many purposes to it, it was never intended by God to open the future just to idle curiosity. He has a much higher purpose in furnishing guidance to the heirs of salvation in giving comfort, hope, and encouragement, to instill confidence and a sense of urgency in them in the troublous times that they live in. In Amos 3 there is a prophecy that most of us are pretty familiar with. When I say "prophecy," I am not talking just about the one that is here in Amos 3. We are fairly familiar with Amos, because I will tell you, it is directed at modern Israel if there ever was a prophecy that was.
Prophecy is both practical and positive. It is not all gloom and doom. Most prophecy begins negatively, but it ends positively because God is confident that what He has prophesied is going to accomplish His end, and that is always good. Much of the thrust of the whole book of Amos is an education for catastrophe. Amos followed Elijah by about 90 or 100 years. During that period of time Israel's sins had continued to mount horribly. Israel had become very wealthy. They became self-indulgent, even oppressively so, and they are still trying to walk a tightrope between God and Baal. They are behaving and worshipping like a Baal worshiper, but doing it in the name of the Lord. Does that not sound familiar to a modern observer of the American scene? "We all worship the same God," our president says. "The god of Islam and the God of Christianity are one and the same." Amos begins by showing two things that provide a basis for what he eventually says: (1) God and Israel have a special relationship. This appears in Amos 3:3. No other nation is therefore as responsible as Israel. "You only have I known," God says. This declaration indicates a very close relationship such as one would have in a marriage, and from that ensues the sharing of experiences together. God and Israel shared them together. (2) Amos wanted to establish that his words carried authority, and that they had better heed, because his words are not idle. He establishes it through a series of illustrations that are also challenging questions that can logically be answered only one way. He does this to awaken them from their spiritual lethargy to that of responsibility. It is as though he is saying, "Think about the ramifications of this, Israelites." What follows is a general pattern of God's operation in His peoples' behalf. His first illustration is that people traveling in the same direction toward exactly the same destination would hardly meet except by appointment. What this means is, "Israel, God has called you and I together." Amos was sent by appointment and He did not speak promiscuously. "It is no accident that I am here." Amos is telling them, "My utterances began with God." He is saying, "You and I did not meet by accident." His second illustration is that lions do not roar unless they have taken prey. The reason they do not roar is because they do not want to scare away their intended prey. Israel is God's prey, as it were, and to this point He is not roaring yet, meaning He is stalking them. Their punishment, their judgment, is about to fall, and Amos is saying, "Israel, take warning, because the margin of safety is very slim." His third illustration is that one cannot snare a bird unless a trap is set, and then something has to cause the trap to spring. This illustration is declaring a cause and effect relationship, meaning "Israel, you are already in the trap! Your sins brought you this warning, and punishment will follow if you continue sinning. You are going to spring the trap, Israel." The fourth illustration is that the alarms go off, and people take notice. Amos is declaring that God is involved in His creation. He has not gone way off somewhere. He is directly managing His creation. He is governing it. This warning of the impending calamity would not come if they were not deserving of it. God, through Amos, is warning them. God is sovereign, and they have no one to blame but themselves. "No justifications, Israel. You are guilty, but God is giving you a chance to repent." The fifth illustration is that it is illogical to think that God would punish without first warning His people. It is an aspect of His mercy. Amos was caused to speak by God, and that is where the authority for his words come from. Amos' words are the warning: "Israel, listen up!" An overall message from the book of Amos is that great privileges must not be abused, or they will bring great penalties. "You only have I known, Israel." To whom much is given, much is required. Israel's sin was her departing from God, which in turn produced great moral corruption and covetousness, called "fornication" in other books of the Bible. These in turn produced careless disregard of the simple duties we owe our neighbors, and oppression of the weak. Amos speaks strongly of public and private indifference toward the keeping of the second of the Two Great Commandments. He is truly a prophet for our time when public morality has fallen so low. Brethren, if there ever was a book of prophecy written for end-time Israel, it is the book of Amos. He is describing modern America, especially, and Britain to a tee. In a more general sense, the Bible shows that prophets tend to arise in a time of crisis. But God is no longer using prophets as He did before the establishment of the New Testament Church. Instead, He has given us an understanding of the dual application of what has already been written. God has given these prophecies so that we can be prepared spiritually for the crisis at the close of the age and also do whatever work of witnessing of Christ's gospel that Christ requires. The Bible's prophets, with few exceptions, have come in bunches. Most of them appeared in about a 250 year period, beginning about 800 BC, and included a remarkable range of personalities like the missionary Isaiah, Ezekiel, Daniel, the ethical Amos, and Hosea, and the outstanding Jeremiah, who seems to be the one who was in the middle of everything that was going on. We are going to deal with about a 130 to 150 year period that began about 620 BC, and contained Jeremiah, Habakkuk, Ezekiel, Daniel, Haggai, Zechariah, and possibly Obadiah and Zephaniah. Their lives and service preceded and spanned the most tumultuous period in man's history till now. It is called "The Axial Period" by some historians, because history shows the rise and fall of nations as events created flip-flops in terms of power and influence. New nations rose to dominating power. Older nations fell, never to rise again, and some nations disappeared from view altogether. The word "axial" means, "having the characteristics of an axis." An axis is a line or a shaft. It can be an event, or even a thought on which something rotates. Rightly applying what happened immediately preceding and during the Sixth Century BC is greater insight to history, and because of the duality principle, it is what is happening right now. The Sovereign God was very much involved, as shown through the writings of His prophets to Israel. Having discernment of this period of time from a biblical, as well as a secular viewpoint, is very important to us, because it is a type of what we are living in and through. The source of the quotes that I am going to give you from a secular point are from a history book authored by Swiss historian Karl Jaspers. It is titled The Origin and Goal of History. It is the German edition published in 1949.
This is particularly interesting, because Jaspers was an agnostic. The fact is that there was intervention on the part of the Deity. The historical evidence, when combined with belief in the Bible, is so overwhelming that even Jaspers, the agnostic, had to mention the obvious appearance of super-natural involvement. What he is saying is that things this big do not happen in that short of a period of time.
Brethren, there is an explanation, because God was involved, and He left a record in the Bible—His record of that same period of time. Notice that Jaspers said it was between 800 BC and 200 BC. That period encompasses the writings of every one of the prophets from Isaiah to Malachi. Everyone of them! The Major Prophets and the Minor Prophets. It just does not include the prophets that appeared in the books of the law, in I and II Kings, and in I and II Chronicles. But from Isaiah on, every one of them operated in behalf of God during that period of time.
Isaiah is the key prophet at the beginning of this period, and he is very interested in a dominating Gentile power—the Assyrians. Now when Isaiah is beginning, is the trumpet a warning to Israel and to Judah of the times of the Gentiles? Assyria is the first great Gentile power, but it is not the most influential. It is Jeremiah, to a greater extent, and Daniel to a lesser, who are the key prophets during the midst of this period during the Sixth Century BC time element. Do not be overly concerned about the exact date. Jeremiah actually began prophesying at the end of the Seventh Century BC, and continued on well into the Sixth Century BC. Turn with me to Jeremiah 1. Remember, Isaiah began this.
I read this verse because I want you to see how far ahead God was planning. The key prophet during this whole time-spread is Jeremiah. God designed this man right from his conception.
Jeremiah, above all others, is the "axial" man prepared by God. God told Jeremiah, who was a prophet not only to Israel and Judah, but to the nations and kingdoms, to root out, to pull down, to destroy, to throw down, to build, and to plant. For those of us who are familiar with our Worldwide Church of God understanding, it is almost automatically engrained within us that we would think immediately of The United States and British Commonwealth In Prophecy. We would think of this verse being used in reference to Jeremiah's influence on the destruction of Israel and Judah, but mostly of Judah, and the replanting of things to build in the northwest, in England. But let us read some other place in the book of Jeremiah, and see that his responsibility was far greater than Israel and Judah.
A pretty big job, is it not? Was God involved during this tumultuous period of time, most of which took place in the Sixth Century BC? A man like Karl Jaspers, who had no belief in God, says it looks miraculous that so much could happen in such a short period of time. Nations that had existed for perhaps a millennia of time just suddenly disappeared, and others that did not even exist rose up to take their place. Who rules this earth anyway? When God wants to make a change, it is dramatic, and it is of a magnitude that fits His sovereign authority. On Page 5 of The Origin and Goal of History, Jaspers makes an interesting comment for what happened during this period.
That agrees exactly with Jeremiah's commission in Jeremiah 1:10. On Page 6 he adds the following:
Where did they go? They virtually disappeared, because God set Jeremiah over those nations to pronounce His judgments on them: the Assyrians, the Egyptians, the Hittites, Elamites, Midianites, Phoenicians, Philistines, Ammonites, Moabites. Nations dissolved from view, and new nations rose to take their place. Babylon, Persia, Greece, Rome, China, India, Europe, and Russia began their ascent to greatness. Those of you who maybe went to school when I did when they were really teaching English may have been taught things about this time in history. Do you know that right within the Sixth Century range the following men lived? Pythagoras, Confucius, Lucian, Buddha, Zoroaster, Numa in Rome, Vales in Greece. A little bit later Herodotus, the so-called father of history, and Hippocrates, the father of medicine, all lived. Great men all in terms of the contribution they made during that period of time. Listen to what Jaspers says again on Page 5.
In other words, the new cultures that arose had a different system at their foundation. "A new order," he says. Now what was taking place? We will let Jaspers begin to answer that.
Jaspers comes to the conclusion that it is, but he uses only secular sources. We can use the Bible.
The answer to Jaspers' conclusion is "Yes." This period of time is the yardstick—the standard for all that follows. The prophet Daniel leaves us with no doubt Babylon became the head of gold. It was the fountainhead influencing the rest of the new civilization. The "image of the beast" arose. Those who have a grasp of biblical prophecy see its reflection in all of history. Right here, brethren, is the beginning of our world. It is a re-shaped world. It is our world! This present world's standards socially, politically, economically, philosophically, and theologically came into being. It was certainly modified somewhat through time, and certainly modified somewhat by the different races and cultures. The New Testament confirms that it exists to this day by calling our present civilization "MYSTERY, BABYLON THE GREAT." Babylon still exists. It is not "Mystery, Assyria." It is not "Mystery, Persia," or "Mystery, Greece" or "Mystery, Rome," or "Mystery, Israel." Babylon is the fountain and the yardstick even in Israel, or this world, and God's prophets were trumpeting its birth long before it occurred, and it was born.
In the 6th century BC a new world—"the times of the Gentiles"—was ushered in. The Babylonian image has influenced the world since the 6th century BC.
This is something man has not learned yet—that the heavens do rule. Babylon has influenced and has given its character to the times. We have to understand that it has not always been the Gentiles who have dominated. The last 200 years has seen the rise and domination of the Israelitish people, with their syncretism of Christian and Babylonian concepts. God is preparing the world for the time of the end and the return of Jesus Christ, and it is a possibility that the "seven times" ended in 1982. It is a possibility. The "seven times" are found by comparing the sum of the numerical value of "the handwriting on the wall" in Daniel 5. I will not go into that. The sum of those figures times the number of days in 7 prophetic years will give you 2520. The number of years from 539 BC (when Babylon was defeated—the tree was cut down, the band was put on, but it continued to live because the roots were still in the ground) till 1982 is 2520. The iron band is then broken, and this confused system's focus in the Israelitish nations has risen to dominate to an extent no other nation has ever dominated during the largely Babylonian way.
I want you to think now what he is talking about here. Secular historians think that what happened in the 6th century BC is almost marvelous beyond belief. Things of that magnitude do not happen that fast in such a short period of time. But we have seen evidence in God's word of what happened and why it happened that way. God Himself did it to bring about a radical change in the history of man. Being that God did it, it was part of His purpose that it occur. Now here we are in Habakkuk, and He is talking about a work that He is going to do that He says is so amazing, that He says to Habakkuk (meaning in his days), "If I told you what I am going to do, you would not believe it." Do you know what it is? God is going to turn the world upside down again, only this time He is going to replace the nations with the Kingdom of God.
God is weaving what He did then, with what He is going to do very shortly here together. This is why we have to be so careful with prophecies with dual application.
What an insult to the real God!
In an overall sense, these prophecies here in Habakkuk speak of the economic, political, and military machinations that occur as the end approaches, but it ends with the return of Christ. Parallel prophecies are fulfilled through the same time period. This is in other places, and the parallel of what is spoken here is the appearance of the Two Witnesses doing their work—that part of the work God says He is going to do that nobody would believe, even if He told them. That is part of it. For even God says that what He is going to bring to pass is astounding, partly because it runs counter to what most could believe is going to happen even if it were told them. The Two Witnesses will be warning the world that a new axial period is being ushered in. Christ is going to return and usher in this new revolution in history. The Babylonian image, which has governed and influenced the world since the 6th century BC, will be replaced by the Kingdom of God. That is why it says, "I have heard of your speech [your fame]." This is probably a reflection on Israel's release from Egypt, because they are in captivity again. Egypt is just a type. I want to go now to Isaiah 29:14. I hope you understand that in an effort to squeeze this into one sermon I have leaped over a lot of prophecies that are going to be fulfilled during this period of time, and just hit on the ones that seem to encompass everything.
That is what has happened right now. We as a nation have lost our wisdom. We have lost what little connection we had with God. He is telling us here that the work of the Two Witnesses is not going to be believed, by Israel largely. It will not be believed. "The understanding of their prudent men shall be hid." But whether men see it or not, a marvelous work of God is going on as He maneuvers the nations into their end-time position. We get a little bit more insight in Revelation 18, because it shows that the commercial and the material success has blinded men, and they weep at the loss of the material aspects of Babylon without even realizing that it has no real spiritual vitality. People are so absorbed with getting that they never see the impending judgment of God, even though they will be shown. It is just like the people did not get what Amos told them. They did not get what Hosea told them. They did not get what Jesus told them, because people are so absorbed in getting that they overlook the impending judgment of God, thinking that they are all right. Even though they are shown, they will not respond, because "they are drunk with the wrath of her fornication." Because of their spiritual drunkenness they do not grasp what is going on. Brethren, do not get caught up in this attitude. This is something that is being generated by Babylon to keep us blind. A person could be word perfect in his response to questions about doctrine. He might habitually attend services, but if he makes little or no use of the relationship between what is heard at services and personal Bible study, and the business of life—until God becomes personal—church is merely a ritual. Peter is the speaker in Acts 3.
Here is a minister of God—an apostle acting as a prophet—and he has a message for us today, for those of us living just prior to Christ's return, just prior to the restitution of all things. He is the voice of God proclaiming and expounding the coming axial period, and the establishment of the Kingdom of God. A further new birth is awaiting the world. Overall, God makes little use of prophets under the New Covenant. The office seems to be absorbed into the apostolic office which is listed first by Paul in I Corinthians 12; however, in Revelation 11:10, the Two Witnesses are described as prophets, and so with them the office will make a re-appearance as they fulfill their mission.
Babylon has a little longer to exist until the turning of the axis of history occurs again. So now is not a time for wild-eyed fanaticism, but a steady sense of urgency given over to preparation, resolving personal spiritual and moral problems.
|