BibleTools
verse

(e.g. john 8 32)
  or  

2 Kings 17:24  (King James Version)
version

A.S.V.
Amplified®
Darby
K.J.V.
R.S.V.
Young's


Compare all


Book Notes
  Barnes' Book Notes
  Jamieson, Fausset, and Brown Book Notes
  Robertson's Book Notes (NT)
Commentaries
  Adam Clarke
  Barnes' Notes
  Forerunner Commentary
  Jamieson, Fausset, and Brown
  John Wesley's Notes
  Matthew Henry
  People's Commentary (NT)
  Robertson's Word Pictures (NT)
  Scofield
Definitions
Interlinear
Library
Topical Studies
X-References
E-mail this page
Commentaries:
Barnes' Notes
<< Previous verse   Next verse >>


2 Kings 17:24

Sargon is probably the king of Assyria intended, not (as generally supposed) either Shalmaneser or Esar-haddon.

The ruins of Cutha have been discovered about 15 miles northeast of Babylon, at a place which is called Ibrahim, because it is the traditional site of a contest between Abraham and Nimrod. The name of Cuilia is found on the bricks of this place, which are mostly of the era of Nebuchadnezzar. The Assyrian inscriptions show that the special god of Cutha was Nergal (see the II Kings 17:30 note).

Ava or Ivah or Ahava Ezra 8:15 was on the Euphrates; perhaps the city in ancient times called Ihi or Aia, between Sippara (Sepharvaim) and Hena (Anah).

On Hamath, see I Kings 8:65 note.

Sepharvaim or Sippara is frequently mentioned in the Assyrian inscriptions under the name of Tsipar (II Kings 17:31 note). The dual form of the Hebrew name is explained by the fact that the town lay on both sides of the river. Its position is marked by the modern village of Mosaib, about 20 miles from the ruins of Babylon up the course of the stream.

The towns mentioned in this verse were, excepting Hamath, conquered by Sargon in his twelfth year, 709 B.C.; and it cannot have been until this time, or a little later, that the transplantation here recorded took place. Hamath had revolted, and been conquered by Sargon in his first year, shortly after the conquest of Samaria.

Instead of the children of Israel - This does not mean that the whole population of Samaria was carried off (compare II Chronicles 34:9). The writer here, by expressly confining the new-comers to the "cities of Samaria," seems to imply that the country districts were in other hands.




Other commentary entries containing this verse:

2 Kings 17:31
2 Kings 18:34
2 Kings 19:13
2 Kings 25:12
Ezra 4:2
Ezra 4:2
Isaiah 7:8
Isaiah 10:9
Isaiah 11:11
Isaiah 36:19
Isaiah 37:13
Isaiah 39:1
Hosea 13:16
Obadiah 1:18
Acts 2:9

 
<< Previous verse   Next verse >>

DISCLAIMER: Church of the Great God (CGG) provides these resources to aid the individual in studying the Bible. However, it is up to the individual to "prove all things, and hold fast to that which is good" (I Thessalonians 5:21). The content of these resources does not necessarily reflect the views of CGG. They are provided for information purposes only.

E-mail this page


The Berean: Daily Verse and Comment

XML RSS 
feeds available
Add to My Yahoo!

The Berean: Daily Verse and Comment

Sign up for the Berean: Daily Verse and Comment, and have Biblical truth delivered to your inbox. This daily newsletter provides a starting point for personal study, and gives valuable insight into the verses that make up the Word of God. See what over 60,000 subscribers are already receiving each day.

Email Address:

   

We respect your privacy. Your email address will not be sold, distributed, rented, or in any way given out to a third party. We have nothing to sell. You may easily unsubscribe at any time.
©Copyright 1992-2010 Church of the Great God (C.G.G.).   Contact C.G.G. if you have questions or comments.