BibleTools
verse

(e.g. john 8 32)
  or  

John 11:2  (King James Version)
version

A.S.V.
Amplified®
Darby
I.S.V.
K.J.V.
Young's


Compare all


Book Notes
  Barnes' Book Notes
  Jamieson, Fausset, and Brown Book Notes
  Robertson's Book Notes (NT)
Commentaries
  Adam Clarke
  Barnes' Notes
  Forerunner Commentary
  Jamieson, Fausset, and Brown
  John Wesley's Notes
  Matthew Henry
  People's Commentary (NT)
  Robertson's Word Pictures (NT)
  Scofield
Definitions
Interlinear
Library
Topical Studies
X-References
E-mail this page
Commentaries:
Robertson's Word Pictures (NT)
<< Previous verse   Next verse >>


John 11:2

And it was that Mary which anointed the Lord with ointment, and wiped his feet with her hair (hn de Mariam h aleiyasa ton kurion murw kai ekmacasa touv podav autou taiv qricin authv). This description is added to make plainer who Mary is "whose brother Lazarus was sick" (hv o adelfov Lazarov hsqenei). There is an evident proleptic allusion to the incident described by John in John 12:1-8 just after chapter 11. As John looks back from the end of the century it was all behind him, though the anointing (h aleiyasa, first aorist active articular participle of aleifw, old verb for which see Mark 6:13) took place after the events in chapter 11. The aorist participle is timeless and merely pictures the punctiliar act. The same remark applies to ekmacasa, old verb ekmassw, to wipe off or away (Isaiah 12:3; Isaiah 13:5; Luke 7:38, Luke 7:44). Note the Aramaic form Mariam as usual in John, but Mariav in verse John 11:1. When John wrote, it was as Jesus had foretold (Matthew 26:13), for the fame of Mary of Bethany rested on the incident of the anointing of Jesus. The effort to link Mary of Bethany with Mary Magdalene and then both names with the sinful woman of Luke 7:36-50 is gratuitous and to my mind grotesque and cruel to the memory of both Mary of Bethany and Mary Magdalene. Bernard may be taken as a specimen: "The conclusion is inevitable that John (or his editor) regarded Mary of Bethany as the same person who is described by Luke as amartwlov." This critical and artistic heresy has already been discussed in Vol. II on Luke's Gospel. Suffice it here to say that Luke introduces Mary Magdalene as an entirely new character in Luke 8:2 and that the details in Luke 7:36-50; John 12:1-8 have only superficial resemblances and serious disagreements. John is not here alluding to Luke's record, but preparing for his own in chapter 12. What earthly difficulty is there in two different women under wholly different circumstances doing a similar act for utterly different purposes?




Other commentary entries containing this verse:

John 4:1
John 12:3

 
<< Previous verse   Next verse >>

DISCLAIMER: Church of the Great God (CGG) provides these resources to aid the individual in studying the Bible. However, it is up to the individual to "prove all things, and hold fast to that which is good" (I Thessalonians 5:21). The content of these resources does not necessarily reflect the views of CGG. They are provided for information purposes only.

E-mail this page


The Berean: Daily Verse and Comment

XML RSS 
feeds available
Add to My Yahoo!

The Berean: Daily Verse and Comment

Sign up for the Berean: Daily Verse and Comment, and have Biblical truth delivered to your inbox. This daily newsletter provides a starting point for personal study, and gives valuable insight into the verses that make up the Word of God. See what over 50,000 subscribers are already receiving each day.

Email Address:

   

We respect your privacy. Your email address will not be sold, distributed, rented, or in any way given out to a third party. We have nothing to sell. You may easily unsubscribe at any time.
©Copyright 1992-2009 Church of the Great God (C.G.G.).   Contact C.G.G. if you have questions or comments.