BibleTools
verse

(e.g. john 8 32)
  or  

1 Corinthians 1:13  (King James Version)
version

A.S.V.
Amplified®
Darby
I.S.V.
K.J.V.
Young's


Compare all


Book Notes
  Barnes' Book Notes
  Jamieson, Fausset, and Brown Book Notes
  Robertson's Book Notes (NT)
Commentaries
  Adam Clarke
  Barnes' Notes
  Forerunner Commentary
  Jamieson, Fausset, and Brown
  John Wesley's Notes
  Matthew Henry
  People's Commentary (NT)
  Robertson's Word Pictures (NT)
  Scofield
Definitions
Interlinear
Library
Topical Studies
X-References
E-mail this page
Commentaries:
Robertson's Word Pictures (NT)
<< Previous verse   Next verse >>


1 Corinthians 1:13

Is Christ divided? (memeristai o Xristos). Perfect passive indicative, Does Christ stand divided? It is not certain, though probable, that this is interrogative like the following clauses. Hofmann calls the assertory form a "rhetorical impossibility." The absence of mh here merely allows an affirmative answer which is true. The fourth or Christ party claimed to possess Christ in a sense not true of the others. Perhaps the leaders of this Christ party with their arrogant assumptions of superiority are the false apostles, ministers of Satan posing as angels of light (2 Corinthians 11:12-15).

Was Paul crucified for you? (Mh Paulov estaurwqh uper umwn). An indignant "No" is demanded by mh. Paul shows his tact by employing himself as the illustration, rather than Apollos or Cephas. Probably uper, over, in behalf of, rather than peri (concerning, around) is genuine, though either makes good sense here. In the Koin‚ uper encroaches on peri as in 2 Thessalonians 2:1.

Were ye baptized into the name of Paul? (eiv to onoma Paulou ebaptisqhte). It is unnecessary to say

into for eiv rather than

in since eiv is the same preposition originally as en and both are used with baptizw as in Acts 8:16; Acts 10:48 with no difference in idea (Robertson, Grammar, p. 592). Paul evidently knows the idea in Matthew 28:19 and scouts the notion of being put on a par with Christ or the Trinity. He is no rival of Christ. This use of onoma for the person is not only in the LXX, but the papyri, ostraca, and inscriptions give numerous examples of the name of the king or the god for the power and authority of the king or god (Deissmann, Bible Studies, pp. 146ff., 196ff.; Light from the Ancient East, p. 121).


 
<< Previous verse   Next verse >>

DISCLAIMER: Church of the Great God (CGG) provides these resources to aid the individual in studying the Bible. However, it is up to the individual to "prove all things, and hold fast to that which is good" (I Thessalonians 5:21). The content of these resources does not necessarily reflect the views of CGG. They are provided for information purposes only.

E-mail this page


The Berean: Daily Verse and Comment

XML RSS 
feeds available
Add to My Yahoo!

The Berean: Daily Verse and Comment

Sign up for the Berean: Daily Verse and Comment, and have Biblical truth delivered to your inbox. This daily newsletter provides a starting point for personal study, and gives valuable insight into the verses that make up the Word of God. See what over 50,000 subscribers are already receiving each day.

Email Address:

   

We respect your privacy. Your email address will not be sold, distributed, rented, or in any way given out to a third party. We have nothing to sell. You may easily unsubscribe at any time.
©Copyright 1992-2009 Church of the Great God (C.G.G.).   Contact C.G.G. if you have questions or comments.