![]() |
||||||||||
What many people sometimes fail to remember is that the earthly Jerusalem of today is a totally worldly Jerusalem. The so-called "holy city" is used to give spiritual credibility to some of Satan's most popular religionsJudaism, Islam, Catholicism, and her daughters of Protestantism. This is for the express purpose of confusing the true religion of God. Do I, in this politically correct world, defy popular belief and call these religions unholy? Absolutely! I do not hesitate in saying that. One need only look at the spiritual state of these religions to see the perversion. Judaism has its pharisaic problems and rejection of Jesus Christ. Islam is a worldwide terrorism plague of cruelty, rape, and murder. Catholicism has its problem with its pedophile priests and idolatry. Protestantism is embracing biblically banned perversions such as homosexuality and other immoral behavior, Sabbath breaking, and stealing God's tithes. And, of course, the pagan religions are even more evil. The representation of the religions of the world is an unholy city because they are unholy religions. There is a lot that is uncertain about Jerusalem. Many historical, archaeological, and topographical problems are unresolved. Jerusalem has played a prominent role in history, but the historical record is scant, and descriptions from literary sources are often imprecise. Despite Jerusalem's antiquity, archaeological remains are not very plentiful, as in the case of other biblical sites such as Megiddo, Hazor, Dan, and Samaria. Many archaeological finds are very often rejected and unpublished, many times intentionally. Proof of Israel's history in Jerusalem has been purposely hidden and destroyed whenever possible for centuries. Neither Satan, nor his world, wants to see proof of God's divine intervention in the affairs of men. Satan's plan requires that the true identity of Israel be erased from history. He has sought to do that for Israel's entire history. A case in point is the recent deliberate destruction by the Palestinians of ancient sections of Jerusalem, especially areas close to the Temple Mount that validate the presence of the ancient Israelites, especially the Jews. This is done in full view of the United Nations, but they happily turn their face the other way. The destruction was getting so bad a few years ago, that in order to protest Palestinian changes of the Temple Mount, U.S. Congressmen sponsored the Temple Mount Preservation Act. Republican Eric Cantor, of Virginia, with 16 co-sponsors, sought to bar all aid to the Palestinian Authority, which was chaired by Yasser Arafat, as long as it continues unauthorized excavations that have destroyed artefacts on the Temple Mount. In introducing the bill, Cantor provided photographic evidence of massive destruction of archaeological sites. Bulldozing of the Temple Mount took place, including the destruction of antiquities that dated back to the time of the first temple. Cantor described the excavations as "one of the most unprecedented attacks on religious heritage of our time." He added that photographic evidence shows that Arafat is intent on erasing Judeo-Christian connections to the holy site. The confusion that surrounds the earthly city of Jerusalem today typifies the condition of religion around the world. So, in one sense, earthly Jerusalem already stands as the religious capital of the world. New questions continue to arise concerning earlier archaeological interpretations. The fact that Jerusalem has been continuously, and often densely, inhabited for almost 6,000 years makes it difficult to excavate systematically. The accumulation of rubble from periodic destructions makes it hard to untangle Jerusalem's complex defense systems. Each time Jerusalem was rebuilt, stone robbers used masonry from previous occupations, thereby complicating the earth layers at the site. Jerusalem's location on a mountain ridge is the source of severe topographical problems. Also, Jerusalem's contours have changed over the centuries. The Tryopoeon Valley has now been almost filled in. On the other hand, the names of architectural features, such as Jerusalem's gates, have changed from time to time, just as the names of geographical areas such as Mount Zion have shifted location. All these problems give rise to controversy, making it almost impossible for the world to advance conclusive answers about the history, archaeology, and topography of Jerusalem. But as always, despite what its critics say, the inspired written word of Godthe Judeo-Christian Biblestands alone in truth and accuracy of the divine plan for this extraordinary city. The history and imagery regarding Jerusalem holds within it the revelation of the plan of redemption for all humanity. Yet, the world does not want to know the truth, even though it would set them free. The imagery of Jerusalem plays a profound role throughout both testaments and has been central to the religious consciousness of the faithful in every age. As the plan of redemption unfolded in the Bible, Jerusalem became an important symbol of Israel's belief that God rules over the earth and that He had established David and his sons as his human vice-regents. As a result, Jerusalem became the image of Israel's grand imperial hopes. It is not my intention to spend a lot of time on the history of Jerusalem, but it will be interwoven throughout the sermon. There is much to learn in history, and if we do not remember history we are doomed to repeat it. We will look at some background on the origins of Jerusalem. It is very probable that the biblical origins of Jerusalem traced back to the ancient Canaanite site of Salem, the city of the priestly king Melchizedek.
It is interesting that right from the beginning, a tithe is mentioned as being associated with Salem. One of the major problems that the city of Jerusalem and the Israelites had, throughout their history, was not giving back to God His wealth. The King of Salem, by name, is the King of righteousness, and by office, is the King of peace. Hebrews 7:1-2 says "King of Salem" means "King of peace"referring to Jesus Christ. You are all very familiar with that. The etymology of the name "Jerusalem" is not certain, at least not in the world's eyes. It is apparently of Semitic origin. An Egyptian notice from the third quarter of the 19th century B.C. mentions Urusalimum. The Tell el Amarna correspondence of the 14th century B.C. refers to the town of Urusalim. The Assyrians called it Ursalimmu. You see the similarities in the pronunciation, or at least the transliteration, of the names that the city had. According to the International Standard Bible Encyclopedia: "The oldest known form, Uru-sa-lim, has been considered by many to mean either the 'City of Peace' or the 'City of (the god) Salem,' but other interpreters, considering the name as of Hebrew origin, interpret it as the "possession of peace" or "foundation of peace." It is one of the ironies of history that a city which in all its long history has seen so little peace, and for whose possession such rivers of blood have been shed, should have such a possible meaning for its name." It is commonly believed that Abraham offered up Isaac upon the mount in Moriah, which is known to be the same mount on which Jesus Christ was crucified. The land of Moriah refers to all the mountains of Jerusalem, which would include Mount Gihon or Calvary, the Mount of Sion and of Acra. Mount Calvary is the highest ground to the west, and the mount of the temple is the lowest of the mounts. I found that interesting, I had not realized that. Beer-sheba, where Abraham lived, is about 42 miles distance from Jerusalem. It is no wonder that Abraham, Isaac, the two servants, and the donkey, laden with wood for the burnt offering, did not reach this place until the third day.
The place of the sacrifice cannot be positively identified. II Chronicles 3:1 seems to locate it on the site of Solomon's Temple. Tradition has held to this view, and it would be difficult to find a more logical spot.
The history of Jerusalem from the time of Joshua to its destruction by Titusa period of 15 centuriesis a succession of changes, revolutions, sieges, surrenders, and famines. Each is followed by restoration and rebuilding. You see constant churning of the city of Jerusalem throughout ancient history. The city's greatest physical glory was reached under the reign of King Solomon. He built the Temple and a royal palace, as well as greatly enlarging and strengthening the walls of the city. One of Jerusalem's greatest humiliations was reached under the reign of Antiochus Epiphanes, 175-165 BC, when the most violent and cruel efforts were made to destroy the Jews and their religion and the city of Jerusalem. Joshua 10:1-4 contains the first specific biblical reference to Jerusalem, whose inhabitants were Canaanites. There, it relates to Adoni-zedek, king of Jerusalem, who formed a coalition with neighboring kings and attacked Gibeon. Joshua defeated them. The Jebusites, the ancient inhabitants that had always been in possession of a part of it, remained there until David captured the entire city from them.
Here we see the first specific mention of Jerusalem. Some scholars suggest that "Jebus" was the name of ancient Jerusalem. But, archaeological evidence suggests that "Jebus" was not the name of ancient Jerusalem before David conquered it. The Amarna Tablets attest that "Jerusalem," not Jebus, was actually the name of the city.
In some versions of the Bible, translators have translated "Jebus" (which is Jerusalem), as the "Jebusite City (which is Jerusalem)." They have done this because Jebus was the family name of the inhabitants, not the name of the city. The account of the capture of Jerusalem by David is obscure, but it seems most likely that the Jebusites, relying upon the extraordinary strength of their position, challenged David.
David directed his followers to go up the water shaft and defeat the "lame and the blind". Then, he turned this phrase around to use mockingly about the Jebusites. It seems at least probable that David's men captured the city through a surprise attack up the great tunnels. David, having captured the stronghold of "Zion," renamed it the "City of David" and took up his residence there. He then added to the strength of the fortifications. With the assistance of Phoenician workmen supplied by Hiram, king of Tyre, he built himself a house of cedar. When David showed a lack of faith and a violent nature by numbering (or, taking a census of) Israel for the purpose of raising an army, it angered God and He brought a plague on Jerusalem and the rest of Israel.
God was willing to destroy the earthly Jerusalem for its sin committed by its leader David. Earlier, the Ark of the Covenant was brought from the house of Obed-edom and lodged in a tent in the "city of David". The threshing-floor of Ornan, the Jebusite, was later purchased as the future site of the temple. The religious significance of Jerusalem first became apparent when David conquered the Jebusite city and established it as the capital of Israel. God's inspiration of David's decision to secure Israel's throne in Jerusalem established Jerusalem as the permanent home of Israel's human monarchs. However, Jerusalem became more than the nation's secular governmental headquarters. One of David's earliest royal acts was to bring the Ark of the Covenant, the very footstool of God, to reside in Jerusalem. By doing so, David also established Jerusalem as the seat of divine kingship. The establishment of divine and human kingship in Jerusalem was furthered by the construction of Solomon's temple. God brought the nation of Israel to its economic zenith using Solomon. With the nation secure on all sides, Solomon built a permanent temple palace for God. But God's use of the palace was conditional on Israel's obedience and righteousness, which Israel did for a short while. Thus, during Solomon's reign, Jerusalem reached its physical high point. Jerusalem was so prominent in the imagination of the Israelites that it came to serve as a figure of speech that represented the whole nation, all 12 tribes. God's administration of blessings and curses on Jerusalem was perceived as salvation and judgment on the entire nation. On the one hand, the prophets warned that God would withdraw his presence from Jerusalem as a result of Israel's enduring apostasy. As a result, the Babylonians defeated Jerusalem in 586 BC and took the people of Judah into exile. The destruction of Jerusalem symbolized the rejection and removal of Israel for her sin. The blessings that once existed in the city were gone.
On the other hand, Israel's hopes for restoration from exile were expressed from the image of a restored Jerusalem. When Israel returned from exile, in about 538 BC, rebuilding the temple and the city was among the top priorities of those who returned from exile.
Restoration of the nation was inconceivable without the reestablishment of Jerusalem as the seat of divine and Davidic kingship. From the time when David brought the Ark of God into the city, until the destruction by Nebuchadnezzar, the city was continually added to and embellished. There were such notable improvements as: Hezekiah's vast structures for aqueduct and water supply, and the enclosing with an outside wall of Zion and the City of David. During the years immediately succeeding the capture of the city by Nebuchadnezzar, it lay in ruins. As we just read in the book of Ezra, Cyrus the Great decreed the return of the captive Jews to their city and the rebuilding of the walls, which by Nehemiah's time had been broken down for 140 years. Under Nehemiah the city regained much of its former splendor. Hundreds of years laterafter Octavian (Augustus) established himself as ruler of the Roman world and restored order to the Empireand after Herod the Great established himself as king in Jerusalem, the city was again restored to much of its former splendor. Under Herod, the Temple was enlarged and beautified. It was in this state that Christ found the city of Jerusalem. Under Herod the city was given a better water supply. Under Herod's grandson, Herod Agrippa, in AD 41, the area inside the city wall was doubled. During Christ's time, and after Christ's death, quite a bit was changing in Jerusalembut only for a short while. The restoration of Jerusalem after the exile provides an essential background for understanding why the city was so important in Christ's teaching of restoration. Jesus proclaimed that the work of the Messiah constituted the restoration of the people of God from captivity. Many thought He meant the captivity by the Romans and previous conquerors, but of course He referred to the bondage of sin. Jesus' work was closely connected with Jerusalem, because the Kingdom of Godthe worldwide imperial destiny of God's peoplecould be realized, only in association with Jerusalem, as the place of divine and Davidic kingship. But to begin to raise restoration to a spiritual level, Jesus explained to the woman with five husbands that we do not have to worship in physical Jerusalem, but should worship in spirit and in truth.
Jesus' teaching effectively ended earthly Jerusalem's position as the spiritual center for God's religion. Jesus performed many symbolic activities in the vicinity of Jerusalem. For instance, his triumphal entry symbolized the victorious return of Davidic kingship to Jerusalem, but not as a physical headquarters on earth, but to a spiritual onethe Church. Christ's death, resurrection, and ascension, the founding of the Church, and the giving of the Holy Spirit took place in the vicinity of Jerusalem. This was closely associated with Christ's exaltation to the throne of his father, David. In contrast to Jerusalem's positive symbolism of the Kingdom of God in the New Testament, we find the negative theme of judgment against Jerusalem. Earthly Jerusalem was the setting for the ultimate rejection of Christ. God's chosen son of David was refused His rightful place as King of Israel. For this reason, just as the prophets warned ancient Jerusalem of the impending judgment as a consequence of their idolatry and Sabbath breaking, Jesus prophesied that earthly Jerusalem would once again be destroyed for their sins. Using the same imagery that the prophets used to describe Jerusalem's fall in 586 BC, Jesus described the imminent destruction of Jerusalem, which occurred in AD 70, and that would again occur at the end time.
What we see here is that each of the three main destructions of Jerusalem progressively got worse. During the time of the apostles, the bad government by Roman procuratorappointed over Judea as a Roman provinceled to discontent and rebellion, as well as the sinful state of the people. Then Titus laid siege to the city and destroyed it in AD 70, sacrificing one million lives in the process. The Temple was destroyed, and the high priesthood and the Sanhedrin were abolished. Eventually, a Roman city was erected on the site, and Jerusalem was regarded as forbidden ground for the Jews. While the physical city disintegrated, the spiritual restoration had begun. Let us shift gears now and look at Mount Sinai. We will take a look at Mount Sinai and Zion and compare the two in their relationship with Jerusalem. The Levites reviewed the events that took place at Mount Sinai in their prayer to God as the Israelites confessed their sins.
We see in these verses that what happened on Mount Sinai was a very good thing. Mount Sinai in Arabia is revered here during Nehemiah's time for its awesome revelation of God, the giving of the law and the disclosure of the sacred sanctuary with its functions. Now it has fallen under the shadow of a new and grander revelation. Although Mount Sinai is a constant presence in Exodus and Deuteronomy; it hardly appears again in the rest of the Bible. After the revelation to Moses it plays no more physically significant role in biblical history. Unlike Mount Zion, it is not closely associated with ongoing political and religious institutions; physically it belongs to the past. In his epistle to the Galatians, Paul develops an allegory of Mount Sinai and the "Jerusalem above", with Sinai representing the old covenant, slavery, and the "present Jerusalem," in contrast with the freedom of the "Jerusalem above". Allegorizing on the two sons of AbrahamIshmael by the slave woman, Hagar and Isaac (a type of the Christian) by the free woman, SarahPaul contrasts sharply "the present Jerusalem" and "the Jerusalem above." He does not make the contrast between "the present Jerusalem" and "the future earthly Jerusalem."
In the allegory, the existing Jerusalem is equated with the earthly Sinai, but then the earthly Jerusalem gives way to the heavenly Jerusalem. Hagar symbolizes "the present Jerusalem," and Sarah symbolizes "the Jerusalem above." For us, God's dwelling is no longer "the present Jerusalem," nor is "the present Jerusalem" the real mother. As verse 26 says, "but the Jerusalem above is free, which is the mother of us all." Now the Jews, in their ignorance, I suppose you would say, look to Jerusalem as their mother. They miss the point totally and do not have the truth. In the New Testament the Jews of the earthly Jerusalem, by sinning and rejecting Christ, became the bondwoman, whereas Jerusalem above (our spiritual mother) is made free by the truth. We are all familiar with the scripture that says "the truth shall make you free." The Jerusalem above is the center of the spiritual Kingdom, as the old Jerusalem, or Mount Sinai, was the center of Judaism. The Jerusalem above is a symbol of the covenant that produces freedom and the true faith of God.
Spiritually, Jerusalem is the exact opposite of Babylon. By apostasy the faithful city became a spiritual prostitute slave. Isaiah 1:21 describes Jerusalem as a degenerate city, "How the faithful city has become a harlot! It was full of justice and righteousness lodged in it, but now murderers." Today, the Jews look to a corrupt physical Jerusalem as their spiritual mother, not realizing that they have willingly distanced themselves from the true spiritual Jerusalemthe Church. Mount Sinai represents the realities of the law. God appeared there in thunder and fire and thick darkness. The law demands absolute obedience, or else punishment. It is in contrast with Calvary, where God appeared in human form in tender loving kindness, and in love. He did not do away with the law, but He fulfilled it, and showed us how we should keep it. The wicked condition of Jerusalem at the time of Christ, with its sin and the destruction, produced by its enemies, was clear evidence of the tragedy that follows the broken laws of Mount Sinai. Let us shift gears again and look at Zion. How does Zion fit into the imagery surrounding Jerusalem? Zion is sometimes used metaphorically, at other times topographically. While the designation has changed across time, originally Zion was equated with the City of David, signifying the Southeast hill of Jerusalem. The Temple Mount to its north was also known as Zion. From the Byzantine period, Zion has been applied to the hill south of the southwest corner of the existing Old City. Zion also designates Jerusalem as a religious capital, and has references to the Church. Earthly Jerusalem, the fair-skinned "daughter of Zion" has taken on the tragic and weathered likeness of "Hagar" from Mount Sinai, bearing children for slavery as we saw in Galatians 4:24, 25.
This image is analogous to Isaiah's comparison of Zion, with its walls evacuated by the exile, to an abandoned wife, or a bereaved and barren mother.
In Hebrews 12, the imagery of Mount Sinai represents the old covenant, while Mount Zion represents the new covenant that takes its place. "Heavenly Jerusalem" is the name given to our eternal home in glory and is also sometimes a reference to the Church.
The heavenly Jerusalem is the place of the New Covenant sealed through the blood of Christ. The elect of God have no connection with an earthly city. As the author of Hebrews put it in Hebrews 13:14, "For here we have no continuing city, but we seek the one to come." The city to come will stand forever, but no earthly city is enduring. All earthly cities are temporary. But we are looking for an abiding city to come. Most people love to focus on earthly security. But the best earthly security is at best insecure. The Jews fruitlessly put their efforts into maintaining their grip on a fleeting earthly city, but we must earnestly endeavor to be obedient to God and overcome our sins. The names "Zion" and "Jerusalem" often stand for the body of citizens (even when far away in exile or dispersed), the whole of Judah, the whole of Israel, or the entire people of God he Church. Jerusalem is at the same time the place of Jewish unfaithfulness and disobedience, and also the place of God's election, presence, protection, and glory. The process of history demonstrated the unfaithfulness and disobedience, which inevitably provoked divine anger and punishment; the glories of the city can only lie in the future, in the heavenly Jerusalem, not in the earthly Jerusalem. As we saw earlier, geographical images are overlaid with allegory in the epistle to the Galatians. Paul begins with earthly Jerusalem as the symbolic center of Israel's history and then the widely regarded hub of the early Christian movement with its acknowledged leaders, James, Cephas, and John. Paul refers to these men as pillars in Jerusalem. Paul retains the traditional Jewish imagery of "going up" to Jerusalem, but he also subverts the favored symbol of Jerusalem as the exalted center of the world for that time, as Isaiah prophesied.
These are the words of the prophet, not of the people. The phrase "God of Jacob" underlines the special relationship of the true God with historical Israel, while "Zion" and "Jerusalem" represent divinely ordained worship and divinely authorized government. Now God ordains and authorizes such things through His church under Jesus Christ's leadership. Isaiah declares that the law would go from Zion; that is, Zion would be the center from which it would be spread abroad. Zion is put here for Jerusalem, and means that the message of mercy to mankind would be spread from Jerusalem, from Zion, from the Church. Therefore, Christ commanded his disciples to "tarry in the city of Jerusalem until you are endued with power from on high." Jesus also said that repentance and remission of sins should "be preached among all nations, beginning at Jerusalem." The law, or will of God, under the reign of Jesus Christ, proceeds from Zion. The written word of God is the message of His mercy and plan of redemption for humanity. Zion, or the Church, is the promoter of religious truth, and the center of religious influence in the world. This influence is manifested in several ways:
In the world, the effect of time only deepens the darkness, driving them farther from God. The world is becoming worse and worse. If it is ever brought to the truth, it must be by a "foreign" influence and not the world. That influence will not go forth from philosophy or science, but from the Church and the inspiration of God. If the light of truth is ever to spread, it must go forth from Zion. Whether the world likes it or not, it is dependent on the Church for the truth of God and of the righteous way to life. We just read in Isaiah 2:3, "For out of Zion shall go forth the law." Of course that law, initially, comes from heaven from God's throne. The glorious earthly Jerusalem of the Millennium will be the earthly representative and forerunner of the heavenly and everlasting Jerusalem that will follow the destruction of the old earth and its atmosphere.
The citizens of the future holy Jerusalem constitute the wife of the Lamb. It is a perfect cube, denoting the complete elect church. During the millennium the elect saints reign with Christ as kings and priests over the earth and over Israel and the nations. There will be the heavenly Jerusalem, the New Jerusalem that comes down out of heaven from our God.
The Greek for "new," as in New Jerusalem, implies that it is new and different from, and superseding, the old worn out Jerusalem. The first foundation of the spiritual church was laid in the earthly Jerusalem. But it was never a part of the earthly Jerusalem, meaning physically. Referring to Isaiah 28:16, Peter wrote in I Peter 2:6, "Therefore it is also contained in the Scripture, "Behold, I lay in Zion a chief cornerstone, elect, precious, and he who believes on Him will by no means be put to shame." This spiritual church is the earnest of that everlasting Jerusalem which will come down from heaven to abide permanently in the new heavens and new earth. To have a part in the New Jerusalem we must have endurance, live by faith, and not draw back. We, in this physical life, must give allegiance to the heavenly Jerusalemthe new cityrather than the old dying city of earthly Jerusalem.
We certainly have our work cut out for us as God works with us to bring us to the point where He wants us to completion. As the earthly Jerusalem came to symbolize Israel's imperial destiny, the New Jerusalem signifies the full realization of that Kingdom promise. The New Jerusalem is a heavenly city that will far transcend the glory of its earthly counterpart. In the New Jerusalem the people of God will enjoy unhindered worship and fellowship under the great Davidic King, Jesus Christ. All things will be made new. There will not be any remnants of the earthly Jerusalem.
What a contrast this is to our present endurance of "a great struggle with sufferings" as we just read in Hebrews 10:32. The conception of a "holy city" as mentioned in verse 2 is based on prophecies that predict a glorious future for Jerusalem after the judgment. Now, continuing in verse 9, it allegorically depicts the final state of the church. This is when the new heaven and the new earth will have come into being.
This picture is drawn from a twofold perspective:
The New Jerusalem is the full realization of the grand destiny of the people of God. It represents the time when the reign of God will be fully actualized on earth through the vice-regency of the great Son of DavidJesus Christ! The New Jerusalem is the place in which we will live and dwell in happy fellowship with God and His Son through eternity.
We can see here the urgency that God gives us in not delaying our overcoming, enthusiasm, zeal, and diligence. Jesus parts with us here in great kindness, and assures us it shall not be long before He comes: "Behold, I come quickly." As when He ascended into heaven, after His resurrection, He parted with a promise of His gracious presence, so here He parts with a promise of a speedy return. If any say, "Where is the promise of His coming, when so many ages have passed since this was written?" let them know He is not slack to His people, but long-suffering to His enemies. His coming will be sooner than the world is aware, sooner than they are prepared, sooner than they want. But to us, His people, it will be a suitable time. When God's will is done, the timing is always right. This promise is for an appointed time, and will not delay. He will come quickly. Let this promise be always sounding in our ears. Let us give all diligence that we may be found by Him, in peace, enduring our great struggle, without spiritual blemishes and blameless.
MGC/pp/drm
|
You Will Only See This Once | ||
|
The Bereans "received the word with all readiness, and searched the Scriptures daily to find out whether these things were so" (Acts 17:10-11). This daily newsletter provides a starting point for personal study, and gives valuable insight into the verses that make up the Word of God. See what over 40,000 subscribers are already receiving each day. |
|
We respect your privacy. Your email address will not be sold, distributed, rented, or in any way given out to a third party. We have nothing to sell. You may easily unsubscribe at any time. |
||