![]() |
||||
Last time we spoke about the Pharisees. We spoke mostly about their origins, and some of their characteristics. We saw that they were one of the main groups that stood in opposition to Jesus throughout His ministry. In just about every case their leading questions exposed their inability to understand some concept that we may consider very simple, especially matters regarding the spirit of the law. They just could not see. This forced Jesus to reprimand them or correct them harshly. Sometimes He just let the hammer down on them, and exposed their ignorance and their distance from God. If you will notice in John 3:10, where Nicodemus came to see Jesus, he said something to Him.
Which is interesting. He came surreptitiously, maybe not wanting others to know that he came to ask Jesus questions. Then, after this discussion regarding "born again":
It was almost as if Jesus was incredulous that someone with this much "spiritual education," who supposedly had his nose in God's Word, had still not picked up anything about being born again from the Old Testament! There needed to be a regeneration! Instead, Nicodemus, like the other Pharisees, was ignorant of this. He asked Him some really silly questions! "You mean I have to go back into my mother's womb?" Come on! He took it all very physically. Jesus was speaking on a much higher level, and so He had to call Nicodemus down for a statement like this. "Come on, Nicodemus! You are smarter than this! You should know this!" And, of course, evidently Nicodemus did learn and ends up being one of the good guys—one of the Pharisees who was converted and became a fine Christian man from what we know. But, somehow, somewhere in the intervening several hundred years from the time that the Pharisees started—we will review Nehemiah 10 just to rehearse this a bit—they had gotten off track and began to miss everything to the right and the left. So, here we are in Nehemiah 10 where they make a covenant. It was a truly righteous covenant (at the time)—to do what is right and follow God's way:
Like I said, they start out well enough. This was a good thing that they made a vow, a covenant, that they would do this—that they would dedicate themselves to keeping God's law, His statutes and His ordinances as well as they knew them. And under Ezra, I am sure that they did well. Ezra was a righteous man. He is never, in the Bible, in any way castigated for being overzealous for the law or being self-righteous. Evidently, he had the right balance on all of these things. But, over time somehow they began to lose their focus on what was actually right. They began to lose their balance. They began to interpret the law so minutely and so rigidly, that it became absolutely impossible to keep. And as Jesus said, they placed unbearable burdens upon the people. This is said in several places. The most well known place is probably Matthew 23 where they placed great burdens on the people, but they would not lift a finger to help decrease their load. So, all in all, if you want to kind of put them in a box as far as their characteristics, they were dedicated legalists. And though they were quite zealous and earnest about their religion—please note: It was their religion, not God's religion. Even though founded in God's law, it ceased to be godly once it got past a certain point where they were doing all these things. We will find out later that it actually ended up in wickedness. But, they were zealous and earnest about their religion, but they were hypocritically and self-righteously traditional and close-minded. What I mean by "traditional" is that they (as we saw in Matthew 15) held the traditions of men to be of higher importance than the commandments of God. They were traditional and close-minded, if you want to pigeonhole them. But of course, I will not stop there. I want to back that up with several examples. And that is what we are going to do today, go through several examples of the Pharisees and their confrontations with Jesus. But we are going to start with one that was a confrontation with John the Baptist in Matthew 3. And it looks like I will not be able to get to Matthew 23 today. I had so much material left over from the last sermon that I was able to add one or two more examples and fill out today's sermon. We will take the time of another sermon, probably at the end of April, to go over Matthew 23 because there is plenty of ammunition there to last a whole sermon. Matthew 3—this is John the Baptist in the wilderness as he is baptizing:
Now what we see here is that the whole area of Judea, maybe all of Palestine, certainly all of the area around Jerusalem were caught up in the ministry of John the Baptist. And, many of them were coming out to be baptized of him. Baptism was not a new thing. But, normally, baptism was done only by proselytes to cleanse them of their gentile-ness one might say, as part of the initiation process into the covenant. Now for John the Baptist to baptize Jews was a radical thing. Jews were already circumcised. They did not need an initiation into the covenant. And so what he explains is that his baptism was unto repentance. His baptism was one of purification beyond the washings that the Pharisees and the rest of them did. This was something that was done one time as an outward sign of repentance from those dead works as we see in Hebrews 6:1. Jesus obviously thought that this was a good thing. He came to this very same man to be baptized Himself as a way to fulfill all righteousness as it says there in verse 15. But, it was a shock to see these Pharisees and Sadducees coming down to the river seemingly to be baptized, because the Pharisees and the Sadducees would normally think that this is an unnecessary practice. They did not need it because they were already initiated into the covenant through circumcision. He does not even let them say yes or no about baptism. He launches into them as soon as he sees them! "Brood of vipers! You hypocrites! What are you doing down here? Who told you to flee the great judgment that is coming?" That is an interesting word picture, "Who has warned you to flee from the wrath to come?" One commentary that I saw said it might be, because John the Baptist was very familiar with desert life. This could be a word picture of desert animals like snakes and rats fleeing before a wildfire. Fire, of course, is a symbol of judgment. During a fire the animals affected by it just run. They might be among their prey, or predators, but they do not care. They are more afraid of the fire than they are of their predators. And so, what he is saying here is that he is calling them a bunch of snakes that are fleeing in fear that they might not be saved. Now that is kind of interesting that these Pharisees, at least the way that John the Baptist looks at them, are motivated by fear. It may be that this was not their motivation; this may not be the word picture that he was actually thinking of, but he certainly backs it up talking about judgment later on. Maybe he thought that they were just trying to cover themselves just in case John's baptism would be the thing that might allow them to sneak through. That makes sense. That is what he was castigating them about. And the very next thing that he says is, "Look, I do not care what you are motivated by, I want to see fruits worthy of repentance. My baptism is a baptism of repentance and I only baptize only those who confess their sins." It is as much as we in the church of God do now. We want to see some evidence of fruit that a person has changed his behavior, not just accepted Jesus Christ, but has actually changed so that he is becoming more like Christ all the time. So, John the Baptist stops them short; basically that is what he does. "What are you guys doing out here? I have not seen anything from you that would make you worthy of this baptism. Show me," he says, "a little fruit. That is all I ask, that you are changing." And then he goes on to verse 9. This is actually the heart of their problem in this particular vignette, "and do not think to say to yourselves, 'We have Abraham as our father.'" Now, why would this be something that he would call them on? The reason is they felt secure and confident of salvation because they were descendants of Abraham. Now, I want to read something to you from Matthew Barclay. This is in his first volume of Matthew, page 47. I want you to see by this how much they esteemed Abraham, and what they thought that Abraham's righteousness did for them. Barclay writes:
This is how they considered Abraham! And this is why John's statement, "Do not tell me that Abraham is your father," hit them right between the eyes. John the Baptist basically said, "everything that you have been hanging on is worthless." I mean, if you look at them from their perspective? If they felt that they were already safe—that Abraham's merits would get them into God's Kingdom—why did they have to do anything? If even the evil Israelites were going to end up in paradise because of the merits of Abraham, why should they be good? That was just extra work! It would be a whole lot easier just to have a "wonderfully" evil life and still end up with all the good in the end. They felt that they could be swept right into the Kingdom of God on the patriarch's coattails. It takes just a few seconds for John the Baptist to disabuse them of this notion because he says, "Look, if God needs them He can raise up children from these stones." It is kind of interesting. It is a word play. The words "children" and "stones" sound very similar in the Hebrew. So, in a way he was saying, "you may be this, but He can just as well take that and make use of it." Commentators also think that he may be referring back to the verse that says to look to Abraham your father, the rock from whom you were hewn. I know that I did not say that properly. It is in Isaiah somewhere. I cannot think of the exact quote right now. This was a particular problem of the Jews. How do I know that? Please go back to Jeremiah 7. It really is a human problem. It is not just the Jews problem. It is a lot easier to rely on something than to try and do it yourself. God makes an example of the Jews, both here in Matthew 3, and then also here in Jeremiah 7.
He is speaking to a very specific group of Jews. They are the ones who are very religious, who took the time to come to the Temple, and worship. He is speaking to what most would consider the cream of Judean society, the true believers.
Do you know what that is in one word? Repent!
Their ability to stay in the land was dependent upon whether they would repent or not. This is what they trusted in:
Now what they trusted in, as we saw there in verse 4, was that the Temple was there. God had chosen David and allowed him to make the plan for the Temple. And then, God had chosen Solomon to build the Temple. And if we would go back and look, He had come and caused His Name to be placed there and He dwelled there in the Holy Place. So, what the Jews were doing at this time was saying, "God is here in the Temple! God is not going to allow anything to happen to this Temple, or this city, or to the people that are in this city, because we are called by His Name. So, we are safe! It does not matter what we do. All we have to do is snuggle up to the Temple and we will be safe." Now let us go down to verse 12. God says:
Did it help those people?
Here were the Jews about 600 years before the time of Christ having the same problem as the Pharisees were having at the time of John and Jesus. They were trusting in something that did not save them—could not save them. One trusted in the Temple and God's presence and the other ones trusted in their descent from Abraham. And neither one was going to save them, because as we know, by grace are you saved through faith—not of works, not of descent, not of proximity. Something else would have to save you. And John is giving the Pharisees an education here in this. Now, verses 10, and 12, back in Matthew 3, are John's threats—his warnings. Remember I told you to keep in mind the word "thorough"? God tells them back in Jeremiah 7 that they need to thoroughly amend their ways.
Now just as He wants us to thoroughly mend our ways, He is going to thoroughly judge. No one is going to slip past His gaze. Everyone is going to have to pass muster. There are no exceptions to this. Each one of us has to come personally before the judgment seat and we have to be able to account for our deeds—the way we have lived. And that goes in spades for us. I Peter 4:17 says that judgment is now upon the house of God, which we are. The same rules apply, and the same Judge is seated and is at work. Remember how in the last sermon I asked a few questions after each scenario? These are the questions that we now need to answer for ourselves after having seen this in Matthew 3:
In Matthew 12, we are going to read verses 1 through 14. It is important here that we do not get too tied down on the Sabbath or healing doctrines any more than we need to. I want to put both of these scenarios together because they have one main point. And I want to take them as a whole. Let us go ahead and read these.
Both situations involved Sabbath activities that the Pharisees considered sinful, but which Jesus plainly considers both permissible and even necessary! These scenarios together point out a major flaw of the Pharisees and that is their proclivity to be callously judgmental. Even acts of mercy fell under their condemnation if it did not conform to their laws. Not God's laws, but their laws! For instance this one that Jesus mentions here in verse 5 is very clear where the priests are able to profane the Sabbath day because of the work which they have to do which God commands. In modern parlance the ministry has an exception in that they can do the bulk of their work on the Sabbath day, and it is not something that is sin to them. Now this can be taken too far, and that is very true of any of these exceptions, or these freedoms under the law. They can be taken too far. But, God does give us a bit of leeway to make judgments at critical moments. Let us say in an emergency there is a dire need for something to be done which would in normal circumstances break the Sabbath, one can do it to help to relieve suffering. I do not want to get sidetracked on this, but we have the liberty to help the needy or afflicted on the Sabbath as the situation arises. It is the classic "sheep in the pit" scenario. We often talk about the "ox in the ditch" (but it is really a 'pit'). If immediate action is necessary we can go help people who have a need. For example, if someone is on his way to church and gets a flat tire, it is not sin to change that tire so he can get to church. But, changing a tire on the Sabbath day, just as a matter of rotating them, would not be right. So, in order to perform worship in a proper way that God has commanded us, if these things (like changing the flat tire) are necessary to be done, we have leeway under the law to do them. This is a liberty that should not to be abused. You do not throw your sheep or oxen into the pit! You do not stick the nail into your tire just to have the thrills of changing one. If there is a flood, fire, tornado, or some other such emergency or disaster, it is OK to lend a hand. It is an unusual situation. It is where you make your own emergencies that the problem comes in and you have abused your freedom. Yet, none the less, we do have this authority and freedom if we use it judiciously. You have to make very precise judgments on these things. Now, the Pharisees should have known this from the Old Testament. What did Jesus do? They accused Him and His disciples of breaking the Sabbath. And He says, "Oh! Have you not read—in the Bible—you know, the scriptures that you hang on so dearly to, that David was able to do this, and the Levites were able to do this—you should have known these things?" It is absolutely allowable to make these exceptions to the Sabbath commandment because of this need. At the time the disciples were doing His work. They were helping Him in His preaching of the gospel. And so because they had gone all day without food Jesus deemed it fine under the law that they could take a bit of food from the field and eat it. Now, had they been doing something else, and had missed their meals, I am not sure that Jesus would have allowed them to do it. But, because they had been doing His work, then they were blameless. It was also in the same way that the priests were blameless in all their work in the Temple. This was the same thing. That is why He says that One that is greater than the Temple is here! He had the power and the authority to make these decisions. Of course, the Pharisees did not recognize that. But, the Pharisees missed this in the Old Testament and this is because they emphasized strict conformity to law over merciful love and relief to their neighbors. Jesus derives this quotation in verse 7 from both Hosea 6:6 and Micah 6:6-8. I want to go through that last one. I want you to see how it is framed here.
This is what Jesus said that the Pharisees missed. What he means is that God is less interested in rote compliance to a set of rules than he is in thoughtful application of godly principles that give evidence of growth in love and outgoing concern for others. Let me say that again! God is less interested in rote compliance to a set of rules than he is in thoughtful application of godly principles that give evidence of growth in love and outgoing concern for others. Obedience is wonderful! I do not want to give anyone the idea that obedience is not necessary, because it is. It is all throughout the New Testament. God is telling us to obey. In fact, all of His commandments are obedience in righteousness. But, obedience with outgoing concern is better! Obeying in love, obeying in mercy, obeying in judgment, and justice—learning to use the old noodle in the situations that come up—is far better than just strictly going by the letter of the law. We usually start at the letter of the law, and then as we gain wisdom, we begin to understand how these things are applied better—more lovingly, more broadly, more godly. Jesus did a lot of things in the Gospels that the Pharisees felt were sin. He is blameless. That is because He used His wisdom to make righteous decisions. They conformed to God's will on these matters. It was not just a matter in these situations that He saw a human need and filled it, but He thought it through. He understood where His help could manifest glory to God. He kept everything in its proper proportion and always placed God first. But, if there was a need, and He saw it, and it was right to do, He was quick to fill it, whether the Pharisees thought it was a breaking of the law, or not—especially the Sabbath law. It seemed like that was the one that got them upset the most. So, the question here is, are we such sticklers for exact law-keeping that we quickly condemn another's practice rather than extending mercy? Or, maybe at the very least giving him the benefit of the doubt? We have talked before about situations where we see people doing something that we consider to be wrong, but we find out later that they were doing something that was perfectly right. Martin talked a few months ago about the man stumbling out of a bar, and hitting his head and getting knocked out. It was actually a minister who had been in the bar counseling somebody for baptism and a light hit him on the way out, caused him to be disoriented and he fell down, hitting his head. He was not drunk at all. He was not visiting the bar for reasons of liquor in the least. He was not there carousing, but doing his job. Any person who might have seen this and did not understand what he was seeing—if they made a snap judgment, then they are guilty of condemning someone who is blameless. So, it is good that we learn to take in the whole situation rather than to be quick to condemn another's practice. Another part of this question is, do we tend to use God's law as a club to beat others down? Do we use the law in a way that makes us appear more exalted, and therefore everybody else who does not keep it our way is not as great? Do we use God's law as an excuse to avoid showing compassion? This means thinking "I had better keep the Sabbath rather than help that person who needs help". These are questions that one needs to think about. They are decisions that one needs to make using what we understand at the time. And, we will grow in these things. But, the Pharisees just totally missed it. Matthew 16 is the section of the leaven of the Pharisees and the Sadducees. One thing that we need to understand is that at the end of chapter 15, Christ fed the 4000. That is the backdrop for this. And in the very next section the Pharisees seek a sign whether He is the Messiah.
We understand this well enough to know that the leaven of the Pharisees and the Sadducees is their teaching. It is very easy to see here. He is saying that the teaching of both the Pharisees and the Sadducees corrupts and spreads just like leaven will spread in the bread dough. That is how leaven works. It begins to grow, and then spreads throughout the entire loaf. It rises. The gasses given off by the yeast's fermentation causes the bread to rise. It symbolizes being puffed up and proud. Now, throughout the Bible leaven is a symbol of corruption—the result of sin. Leaven is nevera positive symbol in the Bible. It is always negative. It is always the symbol of corruption. As we rehearse each year the holy days, we are to strive to become unleavened in our way of life. We will go to that scripture in I Corinthians 5 since we are approaching the Days of Unleavened Bread—a bit of a tie-in to the season. Verse 6, he tells the Corinthian church:
We should understand this. It does not take much leaven thrown into a bit of batter to make the whole loaf rise. Yeast will use up as much of that batter [it uses the starches after the sugars] as it can as food for itself in its fermentation processes. So, you only need a little bit of leavening to make bread. It is a very small proportion of the whole.
Sincerity and truth here are the opposites of leavening. They seem to represent the opposites of leavening. Back in Matthew 16 we find that Jesus tells them to beware of the leaven of the Pharisees and Sadducees. What is the main problem? What is the main part of the leavening that is so bad? I think that the key is verse 8, and the phrase, "Oh you of little faith..." Then, He tells them, "You saw the bread, you saw the miracles that I did, why are you so worried about eating? Why are you, every time I say something, thinking about something physical?" He says, "beware of the leaven of the Pharisees, and the Sadducees," and immediately the 12 of them say, "we have not eaten in a long time! We have taken no bread!" They immediately thought of their stomachs. They went immediately to a physical level. And Jesus said, "You have no faith at all. You have no spiritual insight, or very little. Can you not see that I was speaking metaphorically?" They were not on the same plane as He was. He was a speaking of a matter of faith and they were thinking about a physical matter of food. Now, the leaven of the Pharisees—if you want one word to define it—I believe it would be faithlessness. Remember I said as this chapter opened that they were asking for signs. They wanted to see something with their eyes, to experience some miracle. They wanted proofs that they could see, handle, hear or touch. They wanted to use their five senses to see a proof that Jesus was the Messiah. They wanted to see something again like the feeding of the 5000. But Jesus said that it does not work that way. We walk by faith, not by sight. II Corinthians 5:7 has an early lesson in this principle:
The disciples showed Jesus in their response to Him there in verse 7 of Matthew 16 that they were in danger of falling into the same ditch as the Pharisees. They were beginning to think and practice their beliefs only on the physical level. They were being carnal about it. Jesus wanted to lift their vision a little bit higher onto a spiritual level of faith. If you go on in the story (verses 13 through the end of the chapter, specifically the early part of that section), Jesus tested them on this very point.
And what did Jesus say, "How did you figure that out Peter?" No, He does not say that. He does not say that Peter figured it out at all.
The problem with the Pharisees is that they would not accept revelation from God. They would not take anything on faith. They had no faith. They wanted to see, touch, hear, smell and taste everything. They would not take His word—Jesus' word—for anything, on anything. Jesus was looking for belief here. After they had seen so many proofs of Him—His teaching, His miracles, all the signs—He wanted some little inkling of understanding from them that they were willing to believe God and not have everything nailed down to the crossing of the "t's" or the dotting of the "i's." That was the Pharisees' problem. They were not willing to accept God's word on anything. They had to go and then take great pains to take what God said, and divide it down into these areas so that they could cover every possibility that might come up, and then write it down as one of their laws that could not be transgressed. It says in the Old Testament that you should not carry a burden on the Sabbath. That was not good enough for them. They did not take God's word at face value to allow other people—each individual—to come to understand what carrying a burden on the Sabbath was. Do you know what they ended up with? They ended up defining a burden as anything more than the weight of two dried figs. Where in the Bible is that? It is nowhere to be found! It was out of fear. They were afraid of breaking it. And their fear caused them to stultify. So, they had miserable lives. Would you not think it would be miserable to abide by every one of those minute and rigorous laws that they came up with? They did not have an abundant life like God wanted them to have. That is why He had given them those laws. It says back in Deuteronomy that the people around them would say, "Look at what wonderful laws this nation has!" But, then they took those laws and they tore them to shreds. They were not living by faith, but by sight. They wanted everything to be defined in a law. So, in summary the leaven of the Pharisees is their carnal instruction that demands overwhelming physical proof before granting even grudging belief in anything. They were almost immune to the subtle nuances of faith and they were not in any way able to "feel" the prodding of God's Spirit. God's Spirit cannot work with a heart that is that hard. On the other hand Abraham believed God and it was accounted to him for righteousness. That was in the scriptures in Genesis 15:6. He did not need God to come down and write a Talmud for him on everything. If God said it, then he was going to do it. But, his descendants did nothing of the sort. I have spent some time on this because I fear that this is a huge problem in the church of God today. I fear that this is true because our culture is so unbelieving. It is the culture out of which we have come. It is a culture that demands proof for everything. Proof is not bad. We should prove things to our own satisfaction, especially of things scientific or historic where physical proof is all you can get. But when it comes to God, revelation must take first place. One must believe the scriptures. People today demand checks and balances to everything. They want to see a functioning prototype. They have the "show me" attitude, rather than the very humble, childlike attitude of, "God said it, therefore it is good enough for me." And then, what one does, once we come across something that God says, and we are not sure of it, the very best way to approach that thing is to do it and then wait for God to show you why. Because then you are showing God that you are like Abraham. He believed God and it was accounted to him for righteousness. All it took was for God to say something to him and he did it. He is our best human example of righteousness in the Bible. Obviously, I am not counting Jesus in that. But, if there is any purely human person that we could follow, it would be the example of Abraham. The proof will come later. It comes in the fruits. It comes in additional understanding and many other things—blessings that you cannot even measure because God responds to people who respond to Him. So, the questions at the end of this section are:
|