![]() |
||||
It was Thomas Payne, who was one of the media leaders during the American Revolution, who said, "Government, in its best state, is a necessary evil. At its worst, it is intolerable." Now, I would say that, at its best, that is a contemptuous statement. I heard one man say that perhaps we should say that government is an objectionable good. That is, that we might find much about government that is objectionable; but in the overall sense it is good, because the alternative of no government is unthinkable. What are your views about government? It is obviously, I think, many things; and we have all developed complex attitudes toward and about government. And, in many cases, we feel so strongly in our attitudes about government that we are moved to act and, in some cases, even openly rebel, against it. Our attitudes, knowledge, understanding, and conduct toward and about government may be, and indeed are, the most important aspect of life. Why? How can that be? You have probably heard the cliché that "nothing is sure but death and taxes." Well, here is a new one for you: that nothing is more present than government because government is omnipresent. It is current. It is immediate. It is ubiquitous. It is at hand. It is everywhere. It is always there; and it impacts on every facet of life. To many, like Thomas Payne, government was simply a necessary evil. Others see it as a game that others play in order to exercise control. There are others who seem to be indifferent to it. There are others who are ambitious about it. There are others who are contemptuous of it. But one thing is sure: Our attitudes regarding it are anything but stable. They are subject to change, depending upon the situation. There are times that we want government to be Johnny-on-the-spot, and to crack down swiftly and firmly on offenders. But we want government to be looking the other way and slow to intervene and to be merciful when we are the offenders. We want the government to be quick to intervene and to defend us; but we squirm resentfully if the government begins to intrude into areas of our life where we feel it has no right being. Our feelings about government, indeed, are ambivalent. Chief Justice Earl Warren was quoted as saying, "Many people consider the things government does for them to be social progress; but they regard the things the government does for others as socialism." Now, speaking of socialism, Marx and Engles and other founders of Communism were aware of this ambivalence that we have toward government. And it was their theory that these constantly changing and mostly antagonistic attitudes toward government would gradually disappear if everyone just had what they needed in a classless society. Well, it failed. And it failed because there is a Devil who hates government with a passion, unless he is the one who is exercising the supreme authority. Because of this, we find the statement in Romans 8:7 that "the natural mind is enmity against God: for it is not subject to the law of God, neither indeed can be." It will not be governed by God, is what God's infallible Word says. The result of that, then, is a whole world that hates—above all things—the government of God intruding in their lives. But the converted mind is not supposed to hate the government of God, are they? Do you show, by your life, that you are in submission to His laws? One thing is sure: Government is an absolute necessity. This is more clearly seen as a group becomes larger. As it becomes larger, its needs become more complex because of the different attitudes and perspectives that each person brings to the group. Most of you who are a little bit older will remember Charles de Gaulle. He was the Premier of France, a noted hero, a leader of armies, and a leader of a nation. A leader in the movement, let us say, in what eventually became The Beast. (At least, he was kind of involved in getting things started at the very beginning.) But Charles de Gaulle, the Premier of France, said, "How can you govern a nation that has 246 kinds of cheese?" It was simply an expression of frustration about the mercurial French temperament. He recognized that almost everybody looks at government from a somewhat different perspective. Now this begins to bring to the fore another factor, and that is that there must be common consent by each member of the group to a set of rules (or laws, or standards), or there must be force applied by the authorities in order to secure some sort of consent. What is government? I think it is good to first define the word "govern" and, of course, its noun form "government"—which is derived from it. We are speaking here of the English language; and in Joseph Shipley's book, The Origins Of English Words, on page 195, he says: "The English word 'govern" is derived from the Greek word [which, as far as I know, does not appear in the Scriptures] kuberna. That word means, 'pilot' or 'steerm' implying controlling the direction of something." Most of us are familiar with the term phi beta kappa. People who earn the right to be Phi Beta Kappa are generally considered to be very intelligent. It is quite a prestigious organization. Phi, beta, and kappa are letters in the Greek alphabet; and they are the first letters of a Greek phrase, Philosophia biou kybernetes, which translates into the English, "the love of wisdom is the pilot of life." Or, if we just want to interject the word that we are looking at now, "wisdom is to govern one's life." It is to be the guide. It is to be the pilot that exercises a controlling influence on the person, which keeps him going in a certain direction. Oh, brethren, that it would be so—that man would do this! When we look into English dictionaries to find the applications in our language, we find these terms in regards to "govern"—(It means) to control, direct, rule, be dominant in, to exercise continuous sovereign authority, making and administering policy, to manipulate or strongly influence the actions of. All of these definitions are not gotten from one source. I have compiled them from quite a number, but it will give you a pretty good idea of what this word "govern" means. The Reader's Digest Word Finder gives these synonyms: administer, manage, rule, direct, head, lead, guide, control, supervise, steer, pilot, oversee, exercise authority over, be in the driver's seat, pull the strings of. Now "govern" always implies the aim of keeping on a straight course or smooth operation. But, catch this, it does not always imply for whose good the governing is taking place. Government is three things. (1) It is the act or process of governing. (2) It is the complex of laws, institutions, and customs through which the function of governing is carried out. (3) It is the body of persons that constitutes the governing authority. Those are lengthy definitions, but I think that the subject is important enough to deserve it. If there is anything that I would suggest that you remember, it is that it always implies the aim of keeping on a straight course or smooth operation. Govern, or government, implies an effort to create or maintain order and direction and, sometimes, education towards a certain goal, and it also—necessarily then—implies authority and power to accomplish the same. So govern always implies the aim of keeping in a straight course or smooth operation. But remember it does not always imply for whose good, or benefit, the governing is taking place. Now let us begin in the Bible, in Genesis 1:1. We are going to begin at the beginning and, from the Scriptures we are going to see principles. We are going to see examples. We are going to see patterns develop from the great governing Force, or Being, or Personality who rules this great creation. He gives us plenty of information by which we understand what ought to be the function of government and what ought to be our proper attitudes toward it. There is much instruction in regard to this subject.
And then, of course, the account continues with creation of various things taking place all the way through the first week of the creation. But I want you to see the position in which the very opening of God's Word places God. God is immediately introduced in His Book as governing His creation. He is seen as exercising authority and power to bring order out of chaos. That is what government does! It either brings order out of chaos, or it imposes order—in order that there be no chaos. There you have it, right at the very beginning—God exercising authority. And, in this case, He does it in order to bring order out of chaos. He is once again setting the creation He governs heading toward the goal He is accomplishing. Everything that He creates (I am drawing this from, let us say, an overview of Genesis the first chapter)—whether it is a being (as with angels, or men), whether it is a creature (as with animals), whether it is an institution (as with marriage), or whether it is a thing (vegetation, or insects)—is seen as an integral part of His governance toward the accomplishing of His goals. So what was He doing in Genesis 1? He was creating an environment to bring about the conclusion of His purpose. We understand, in verse 26, that mankind (man and woman) are created in the image of God.
Which proves that "man," at the beginning—the opening phrase of verse 27—includes male and female. It is mankind. Both man and woman are made in the image of God. He created them.
In this verse we see God—the great Creator, the great Governor and Ruler of everything—now confers authority to govern to mankind. This also implies that God also gave the powers, or gifts, necessary to do this. A power, or gift, might be intelligence. It may be the power to communicate. It may be the power of being able to think and devise, to think spatially. It may be even the things that we call "hands," because it takes a hand (working with a brain, a mind) to be able to create and to do things. God gave to mankind whatever was necessary, whatever powers were necessary, in order to enable them to govern the creation. So then, this implies that He gave the powers and gifts necessary to be able to carry out this function. Now the words, "dominion" and "subdue," might inject to us a sense of foreboding because those words have a tendency, among us English-speaking people, to think of negative uses of power. That is, abuses.
This has to be put together with "dominion" and "subdue" so that we understand that God is showing that His intent in giving mankind governing powers is only good and positive. Mankind is to use his governing powers to "maintain." That is what the word "keep" means. "To preserve from decay" is another application of that same word. "To tend" means to edify, to cultivate. It means to promote growth toward the perfection of beauty. So God's conferring governmental power and authority, and all the gifts that were necessary, were intended by God to be used in a positive way, not in any negative sense at all. The power was intended to be used in a positive way—for the good of creation, which God had just reformed and shaped.
The governor issues instructions and laws for the governed (in this case, mankind) to be edified and submitted to so that there will be order, and the governed will be prepared toward the completion of God's goal. Do you see how everything is unfolding? Do you see how we are seeing the right and proper uses of government? Fathers and mothers, are you doing this in your home? We will continue, because here is the great Governor unfolding the purposes of government for all of mankind to see. We see here, clearly, that one of the functions of government is to educate its people. You see, to edify. He instructed them. Also to give laws, which would maintain order and aid in the completion of the goal (or purpose) that is being worked out. That is a major function of government! Now, in this case, God is doing this so that mankind's conduct and goals will be in harmony with God's purpose. God is also showing us, in broad strokes, some of the major purposes of right government, and that is, to edify and to guide. Of course, He also warns of penalties (and in this case, a penalty) that may come.
Here we have the introduction of a competitor of God's and also, I might add, the main competitor of mankind. He injects a different perspective of how one should look at government. He begins to inject doubt about right functions of government.
The first lawbreaking occurs. And then what unfolds?
We begin to see a fulfilling of the instruction that God undoubtedly gave them as a part of what we see there in Genesis 2:16-17—which I am sure is just an encapsulation of all of the other instruction that He also gave them. What we see in chapter 3 is an unfolding of the result that takes place whenever lawbreaking occurs. And we see again the reaction of the supreme Governor of everything; and He shows us, then, another function of government in the way that He reacts.
And to the man, Adam:
The Governor—the Government—reacts by making a judgment and issuing a sentence. So we see here that another purpose, or responsibility, of government is to enforce its rules. We also see the warning that, because of law , the process toward disorganization will be sped up. That is what we begin to see, especially in those things regarding the curse that came upon Eve and then Adam. Especially the one with Adam—"cursed is the ground for your sake." We are beginning to see the fruit of disobedience to government—the process of disintegration, of disorganization. The movement toward chaos will be increased incrementally by the disobedience of the government, let us say, that is in power. Now, in chapter 4, we see a similar occurrence. We will not go through that, because it is very similar to chapter 3. But I want you to note that what we have here is a very clear record in regard to government, and we are only in the fourth chapter of this most important of all books. But I submit to you that, though the word "govern" only appears three times in the King James Version and the word "government" only appears four times in the entire Bible, this is by far and away the most important of all subjects in this most important of all books. This subject is implied in virtually every bit of information given in this Book; and it is given that we might have the right understanding of, and reaction to, government—whether it is secular, or whether it is spiritual. Now, let us take another step in this unfolding of the purposes of government, in Genesis 6:
Remember I said that as an organization gets larger and becomes more complex, government becomes more and more difficult; and it is more and more important that there be consent of the governed toward the constituted authority. And that is exactly what we begin to see here in chapter 6. As the population increased on earth, the problems became greater and greater because that population was not submitting to the constituted authority—which was God!
What is God doing here? God is showing what will result, generally, when the rejection of government occurs and, specifically, when God's government is rejected. When government is rejected it produces anarchy, which usually begins first to be seen in the home. That's why this chapter is introduced the way it is—focusing on marriage. That is where the breakdown first begins to appear. The homes begin to be places of instability, rather than places of stability because the government within the home is also being rejected. Then it begins to appear in society—out on the street. And it keeps getting stronger and stronger (unless something is done about it) until it will lead to anarchy. But even that is not the end of it. What does this chapter show you? How does it conclude? This section concludes with the extinction of mankind. That is pretty sobering. Again, remember that God is showing us these principles in great, broad strokes, but there are wonderfully clear principles that we can gather from it. When government begins to be rejected, it will lead to the extinction of the institution—whether family, whether organization, whether it even be life on the earth. So either mankind submits, or it becomes extinct. Either we will wipe ourselves out through the anarchy, or God will intervene and do it for us (to save us the agony of experiencing the anarchy). As we continue to see what the function of government is to play in our lives, I think now we have to begin to look at what God did when He chose Israel to be His nation, because again, there are patterns that are going to be valuable means for our learning. We are going to slow down here, because this is important in understanding the God-ordained functions of government. Let us turn first to Exodus 18. The time setting here is, of course, before they arrive at Sinai. The covenant has not yet been made. But Israel is forming into a nation. They are out of their captivity, their slavery, in Egypt just a couple of months. When we get to Pentecost, when the giving of the law takes place—when we get to Sinai—we are only 50 days, roughly, from the time that they left Egypt. So things are developing rapidly within Israel. All the while that they were in Egypt, they were under the government of Egypt, but now they are on their own, and a government has to be formed. We get to Exodus 18 and Moses was the only visible form of government. Now we are talking here about 2-2½ million people. I mean, you can have a lot of trouble for one man to try to reach judgments on. You know how much trouble we have in our families, and there are only less than five or six in most cases. Can you imagine how many cases, how many situations, Moses had to hear?
Jethro saw a problem, and he proposed a solution. I want you to notice here that Jethro did not try to force it on Moses but, rather, made the suggestion that Moses use it only if God was pleased with the advise. "I will give you counsel," he says in verse 19, "and God will be with you." God was pleased with the advice, and it is obvious that God accepted it. God did permit these men to now join the structure to govern. And they are called here a "judge." Let us remember that this was a carnal nation. I do not know how many people were converted, as we would view conversion—Moses, Aaron, Joshua, and Caleb, maybe others as well. But we are talking here about a carnal nation. But I want you also to notice that the extent of the judges' authority, the limit of their authority, is not given. It is only given that they are to judge—that is, render decisions that are based on the law of God. Now, this may surprise you, but neither God nor Moses directly appointed these men. The people chose them, and Moses confirmed their choices. How do I know that? This is very interesting, because it begins to give one maybe a hint of what we might consider to be democracy. Were the people to have a voice in whom it is who is going to rule over them? Is that a possibility? Let us go to Deuteronomy 1. Remember that "Deuteronomy" means "the second law." It is a summary of events—highlights of things that took place—during the 40 years in the wilderness. And we have this summary given in order to inform the people and to prepare them for going into the land. It is very interesting that one of the first things that he covers is what occurred there in Exodus 18. I mean, one of the first things that he covered in regards to his summary. Now verse 6. I want to set the chronology here for you.
The time setting of this was while they were still at Sinai. Horeb is the general name of the area. Sinai is the name of one particular mountain in that area. So, this was while they were in Horeb.
Now look at what Moses said to the people.
An interesting insight into a function of the government of God is that it received the counsel of the governed as to who was going to rule over them as a judge. And then, God's government, through Moses, exercised its authority and passed on these men. It is entirely possible that Moses was given quite a list of people, and that, from that, he then selected those he considered to be the most capable for fulfilling this responsibility. This is interesting when we get to the New Testament, because we will find that the people chose the deacons who were to serve them. And the apostles, like Moses, confirmed those people into their office.
So they were set up in a military type of organization.
So what we see here is the delegation of responsibility in the administration of the government of God. The government of God? Yes. Notice verse 17, where it says, "The judgment is God's." Even though the men would be doing the actual judging, God is seen, we would say, as being 'in the loop.' He is part of the process. I also want to interject at this time that He is not insuring the quality of the decision. Rather, this is instruction to the judges to be aware and careful because they are going to have to give account to God for their judgments. It was a way of putting the fear of God into them. Notice, again, verse 18. Moses said, "And I commanded you at that time. . ." It means that he authoritatively taught them their responsibilities. Moses, then, performed his function in the government by providing guidance in these civil affairs that were, undoubtedly, undergirded by God's spiritual law. So again we see the function of education that God's government is taking. Let us go to Numbers 11. Chronologically, it is not far removed from the occasion in Exodus 18. By "not far removed," I mean that it was less than two years. In fact, it may have been less than one year from the occasion in Exodus 18. So here we have a separate but similar event that took place a little bit later. So, let's set the stage. The people were complaining. In verse 5, they remembered the wonderful food that they felt that they had eaten in Egypt.
While Moses was probably displeased at what the people were doing, he was also displeased with God and what He was doing. Moses did not understand what was going on, either. So he makes a complaint.
Now remember that he already had the other ones appointed.
I do not think Moses felt very good, did he? Now look at what God's response was.
I want you to notice that the title shifted here—from "judges" to "elders." Does that indicate anything to you? The pattern is already set in what happened following the experience of Moses with his father-in-law, Jethro. The pattern is set, but here assistance is given to Moses of a spiritual—rather than a secular—nature. The problem here was bad attitudes. Moses was simply unable to minister spiritually to all of these people. And so God took of His Holy Spirit (that He had given to Moses); and He distributed to the seventy the same Spirit. So we have a group of men; and it is quite possible that many (or, some) of these seventy were the same men as in the Exodus 18 incident. Again, we see that those who are appointed are also given the wherewithal to function in the government. And, again, we see that there is a limit to that authority. The limit seems to be imposed in the sense of being spiritual, and not civil. Now back to Exodus 18—back to the original group. Jethro is here talking to Moses.
In researching this subject, it is interesting that one commentary said that what this amounted to was a leadership class. Moses was to authoritatively instruct the people chosen as judges in the way of God. That is, he was to lay down commands and explain to them the purposes of God—the law of God—that they might understand it. Again, we are focusing here on the function of a leader in God's government. A governor, a leader, a ruler, or an elder's main function is to teach. Even God showed that. That is what He did in the Garden of Eden. He taught Adam and Eve.
Now, one final thing here—I want you to compare this with the American system of justice. In our system, if one gets an unfavorable decision from the court, the thought is always that one can appeal to a higher court. In this system in Exodus 18, there is no thought of appeal by the litigants given. It seems to be that only the judge passed it on, at his discretion, if he thought it was too hard for him to handle. Boy, that would clear up the court system in America in a hurry, and we would not have this big logjam of cases if there were no court of appeals. Let us turn to Exodus 19, as we continue to unfold the functions of government.
We have advanced to the place chronologically to where God formally proposes an agreement with them in which He will be their ruler (governor, king) if they will consent to be obedient. There is the "if." How many times have you heard the statement that "God will not save anybody He cannot rule"? If a person does not voluntarily consent to be ruled by God, then God will not be that person's Governor, King, Ruler, or Savior. That appears right here in the Old Covenant, and these people gave their consent. Now notice the next thing that happened. Please, if you do not get anything else out of the sermon, please, get this! (And remember this, because it becomes very important to the Christian.)
At this time, brethren, when God was about to begin His formal governance of Israel, His people, those who had consented to be ruled by Him, there was nobody between them and God. There was no governmental structure. God spoke to them face to face, and they rejected it! "God is testing you!" Moses said. Now I want you to compare this with Numbers 12 and the relationship that this converted man, Moses, had with His Creator God.
There was nobody between God and Moses. There was nobody between this converted man and his Creator, and his Ruler, and his Savior.
Let us go all the way back to Genesis 17 and let us look at the kind of relationship "the father of the faithful" had with his Creator.
Did you see that? The Lord appeared to Abram.
I believe that Exodus 20 was indicating that God was prepared to do for the entire nation of Israel the same as He had done with Abraham, with Moses, and with others as well. But He presented Himself in such a way as to impress upon them the weighty responsibility of such a situation. (Paul said, "Our God is a consuming fire.") And they quickly chose a mediator to stand between them and God. Now, what is the purpose of government of God? God laid down a lot of laws, which begin in Exodus 20 and continue through Exodus 23. But those laws express something that is important to you and me. Again, we are going to look to the book of Deuteronomy just to get a summary statement, just to be reminded, so we can see the purpose of government—the government of God.
There it is. There is the purpose of His governance of His creation—as expressed in His laws. His government's intent is to produce life. Now I am not talking about living and breathing. We already have life. I am talking about eternal life, with all of the qualities that go with it. Things that we are to learn here and now. But I am also talking about abundant life, the way that God intended that it should be lived. I am talking about a wonderful, free, prosperous, and full life that God wants to give to every person. At this point, I think that it is good to insert that the Hebrew word torah, which is usually translated "law" or, "laws" in English Bibles, which is more closely related to the English word "instruction." But "law" is included within instruction. God is shown, in His Word, as the Great Educator—preparing His people for living, and teaching them a way of life that will produce an abundant life. Some of His teaching comes in the form of law. It has to be that way, because that is a major responsibility of government. It is very similar to the teaching of a coach, trying to teach people to play a sport well. When he teaches, he not only shows people how to do the mechanics, but he also teaches them the rules of the game. And he lays down rules for remaining on his team. All of those things are part and parcel of instruction. All of those things are part and parcel of governing. It is a way to keep people moving in an orderly direction.
And on and on it goes. Just look at the kind of life submission to the government of God would produce! "But it's so hard," people say, "to be obedient to God's law." No it is not! How can I say that dogmatically? Because in His Word God says the same thing.
They produce the good things!
It is not God's government that is burdensome. It is Satan's, and man's. What is so difficult is overcoming the enmity against God—the attitudes, and the character, instilled in us by living under those governments of Satan. In our lives, we have followed the patterns exemplified before us. That is, we see these things happening all the time by our leaders. And the vanity, and the competitiveness, and the greed, and the deceitfulness—we have picked that up, from the leaders of this world. This world and God's people greatly need a change of government. A government that will teach us, lead us, and guide us in the ways that will produce the right things. If you are converted, then you are a part of that body of people who have consented to be ruled by the government of God. That is, those who have consented to live by this way of life that will produce an abundant life. JWR/plh/drm
Start Your Day with ScriptureBegin each morning with God's Word the Berean delivers a daily verse and insightful commentary to spark reflection and growth. Join 135,000+ fellow believers on this journey.
|