![]() |
||||||||||
So far in this series we have seen that the Father and Son are two distinct personalities working out distinct responsibilities in the purpose that they are completing. They cooperate so smoothly and effectively it is as if they are one, but they are clearly two, and though they are both God, the Father is the greater of the two. The Father is shown in the Scriptures as the Source from whom all begins, and He also is the Object toward which all is moving. The Son is the Channel through whom all is being done. He is not only the means of creation itself, but also the Mediator between the Source and mankind. He is the One with whom mankind has always interacted. In Colossians 1:15, the apostle Paul identified Jesus of Nazareth as the Image of the invisible God. It was He who appeared to and conversed with and gave commands to Adam and Eve, Abraham, Moses, Joshua, and many, many others besides. He did not always appear in the same guise, but rather in the form needful at the time for the Father's purpose. Regardless of the form in which He dealt with man, He was always God, whether He was known as Yahweh, Lord, El Shaddai, El, El Olam, Jesus, and literally over two hundred other names. He is called Yahweh 7,838 times. He is called God 4,456 times. In all of His representations to mankind He is always the express character Image of the Father, revealing portions of His nature that we might come to know Him. This is necessary to us because to know Himthe Father, the only true Godis eternal life. We saw in John 1:1 that it is capable of an alternate translation. The one suggested by Knoch is that we think of the Logos as the "expression" of God. This is not because logos (translated into "Word" in the English Bible) is wrong, but rather because "expression" broadens the picture of how Christ reveals God to us. We also saw in that series of verses that the term "with" in verse 1, in that translation, is misleading. How someone can be "with" himself is beyond comprehension. Besides that, the term "pros ton theon," which is the one that is translated into the English preposition "with," is more clearly synonymous with the English words toward, to, into, unto, or even against (meaning somebody that you would face). The term pros ton theon indicates direction, not association; thus the first verse is telling us that the Word of God points us toward God. Thus the apostle John begins a revelation to Hebrew people familiar with the Old Testament that Jesus of Nazareth is the God, the Lord, of the Old Testamentthe long-awaited Messiah, the Anointed Savior. Now through the Son we see the Father's power, His wisdom, and His flawless character. In Christ's final form as a slave, as a man of the seed of Abraham displayed before the apostles for three and one-half years, we are able to catch a living display of God's affections and His sacrificial, serving nature to the extent that He will go so far as to die for His creation.
In order to get a much stronger more intense effect of this, it really should be seen within the context of the five or six verses preceding it where Jesus is shown to have emptied Himself of equality with God. Paul used the illustration of Him emptying Himself in order to thus set us up for the practical application for you and me that appears beginning in verse 12. As Jesus did, we are to work out our own salvation in humble, sacrificial fear and trembling, that even as the Father worked through Christ, He is also working in us to complete the assignments given us. Further, since it is God working in us, we have no legitimate reason for all of the griping and grumbling so common to mankind, or arguing amongst ourselves as if God is not overseeing all things pertaining to us. The object of this is to be a light before the world against which no legitimate accusation can be made. They may complain, but if we are doing God's will, any accusation will not be legitimate. Let us go back to the Old Testament to Isaiah 53 and we are going to touch on a prophecy showing how the Saviorour Lord and our Godwould live His life as an example to us. Remember, we are to be living sacrifices. This is especially meaningful whenever we understand that we are talking here about the God of creation.
Are you following suit? Let us look at one more Scripture from out of the New Testament in regard to the One who did not think that equality with God was a thing to be grasped.
Here is our example from One who had equality with God, as being of the same kind, and yet He emptied Himself, became a partaker of flesh and blood and fulfilled His responsibilities flawlessly in the form of a slave. Now compared to this series of sacrifices, what basis do we have for any complaint? In the first half of this sermon we are going to look into Christ's relationship as being the Mediator between God, the absolute Deity, and His creation, mankind. In the second half, we will begin looking into Christ as the Son of God. Overall, this message centers on the uniqueness of Jesus Christ. Turn with me to I Timothy 2:5. It is always so interesting to see something out of the apostle Paul here that is so revealing.
Again, that is very clear. There is no trinity. We are dealing with two distinct Beings occupying distinctly different responsibilities. The uniqueness of Jesus Christ is that He is the divine link between God and man. He is neither the absolute Deity, nor is He merely human. Some people will argue either way that He is one or the other, but if we are using Scripture, all those arguments run into limitations. The solution is to admit, upon evidence supplied by Scripture, that He is quite unlike any other personality in the universe. There is nobody like Him! The following is gathered from five different sources: The verb "mediate," from which mediator is derived, is itself derived from the Latin word "medium." Medium means, "middle," thus a mediator is perceived as one who is in the middle between disputing parties working to reconcile them to each other. A mediator is one who intervenes. He intercedes. He is a negotiator. He is a conciliator, always working to help either side know the other and the whys and wherefores of their position better. His uniqueness, among other things, is that He is derived from two different sources. His spirit is directly from God from conception in His mother's womb. No other human being has that distinction, but His body, containing life, is purely human and is therefore subject to human frailties, such as mortality. His consciousnessthat is, His awareness of Himself resulting from this combinationis unmatched in that with His mind He is able to communicate directly with the absolute Deity while at the same time also being acutely aware of the conditions, needs, failings, pains, hopes, fears, and potential of human man. The FatherAbsolute Deitydoes not possess this combination, nor does any other man. The Christ is absolutely unique. What this does is add yet another satisfying piece of evidence that we are dealing with two different Beings in a unique relationship. How can they be co-equal when there is a vast difference between the two of them? When Paul says that Jesus is the image of the invisible God there in Colossians 1:15, he is not saying that they are identical, because when we begin to clearly identify the Christ, it becomes apparent that exact likeness with the Father disappears and that Jesus, on His own, though of the God-kind, is neither co-equal nor of one estate within a confusing trinity, but a separate unique Being. Because Jesus has the same spirit, which is to say "the same nature," He indeed was the express image of the absolute Deity in terms of character, and that is why He could honestly tell the apostles, "If you have seen Me, you have seen the Father." It is not that they looked alike, but because of the same nature they acted alike. Turn with me to John 17. This is a great chapter! In this prayer, Jesus said:
First I want to address what Jesus said in verse 4, in that He said He finished the work that God assigned Him. That work, in its overall sense, was to preach the Gospel, to reveal the Father, and to die for the sins of mankind. I especially want to note that revealing the Father, in relation to verse 3, He stated right there in that verse that knowing the Father and the Son is eternal life. I know that I have tended to overlook that. I have tended to concentrate on "to know God the Father," but Jesus said to know both of them is eternal life. It is knowing the Father and the Son that makes possible for us to have a relationship with them and opens the door to the abundant life that Jesus spoke of in John 10. I am going to make a statement here that I feel is exceedingly important. That is, that based on what it says here, and actually in a sense encompassed by everything in the Bible, that the knowledge of God and of His Son Jesus Christ is the ultimate goal of human intellect. We have been given intellect somewhat like God's in order to come to the knowledge of them so that we can live like and with them. That is why He said that the knowledge of God and of His Son is eternal life. The knowledge of the Father and the Son is the object of all life and experience. Now surely you desire an abundant everlasting life, do you not? Well, in one succinct statement, Jesus told us the key. It is to come to the knowledge of the Father and the Son, to know them. Since the Father is the Source of all that there is, and the Son is the Channel, or the Mediator, through whom He works, a full-blown revelation of the Father comes only through His Word, His expression, His imageHis Son. It is in seeing the Son that we behold the Father. As we become acquainted with Christ, we come to know God. There is a strong tendency to perceive Christ in only one dimension (an important one to be sure), and that is as our Savior who died for our sins. But there is much, much more to Him than that. He is most definitely not a one-dimensional personality. Now what could be more helpful to life than a serious consideration of the relationship of the two most exalted personalities in the universe? Well, the answer is, "Nothing." The way the Bible presents them is through a series of likenesses and contrasts. They are related to each other, and it is practically impossible to study them apart. On the one hand, if the Son were not like the Father, how could we see the Father through the Son? So He has to be like Him, does He not? On the other hand, if they were not unlike each other, they would be identical, and the Son would be every bit as inscrutable as the Father that He intended to reveal. The Father is inscrutable. We cannot even see Him. We cannot hear Him, and so Christ is not identical. Being the Mediator demands then that He be both similar and dissimilar to both sides of this as yet completely unreconciled equation. You see, we are on the one side, God is on the other, and Jesus is in between. He is like us in some respects. He is unlike us in some respects. He is like the Father in some respects, but He is unlike the Father. Only He has trod on both sides. He shares similarity with God on the one side, but He is also dissimilar to Him as well, and so He shares similarities with man on the one side, but He also has dissimilarities with man as well. Here is a simple example: If the absolute Deity is invisible, then the Son must be visible if He is going to reveal Him. If the absolute Deity is inaudible, then the Son must be audible if He is to reveal Him to mankind. Yet in both cases, what the Son reveals of Himself must match what the Father would do or say if we could see or hear Him.
This is a very clear statement that Jesus had a God, and that God was His Father. Do you understand the implications of that? This was uttered while He was a man dying on the stake, so it might be argued that Jesus cried out to God because He was a man. But that argument begins to lose some of its force when we look at John 20:17, when Mary Magdalene grabbed Him when she recognized who He was there outside the tomb.
There He is, resurrected, and that same One He said in Mark 15 was His God is still His God. Our Lordthe Mediator between us and the Supreme Godhas a God, and that God is the One He revealed. Brethren, we must see God. We must hear God. But that is literally impossible because of the restraints that God has imposed upon Himself, but we can realize both of these exalted Beings through Jesus Christ, our Mediator. Now we see in Him not only Himself, but also His God, and through His words we hear not His words, but the words of the Father who sent Him. Jesus Himself said that. "These are not My words. They are the words of My Father." The glory of Jesus Christ lies in His perfect submission to His God. He is not a mere man, or absolute Deity, but the Mediator between them. I think that if we understand the Son's mediator role, we will grasp that His mediation is not limited to New Testament times; rather, He has always been in between the absolute Deity and mankind from the very beginning of man's creation in the Garden of Eden. It has always been Him who has revealed the Supreme God's position on things pertaining to man's relationship with God, whether under the Old Testament or whether under the New, as God's purpose unfolded. In the Old Testament I do not believe that the title "Son of God" is even once applied to the One who became the Christ. However, it is used for others in a looser more general sense than it is applied to Christ in the New Testament where the term "Son of God" becomes very restricted in its usage. Regardless of which Testament though, it is a term that indicates likeness. That term also carries with it a measure of dignity, and above all, sanctification, or consecration to responsibility. In the Old Testament its most general sense indicates some measure of likeness, but not necessarily likeness to the extent of exact likeness. You will understand this in a moment. Let us go to the book of Job. I am still, in a sense, trying to get across this idea of Christ being the Image of God, but yet He is not exactly alike, as we would tend to think.
What do we have here? It shows that angels too are sons of God, and from this, knowing that Satan is an angelic being, we can reach a true conclusion regarding Satan, that he too is a son of God. Are you beginning to get the idea here, that just because Jesus is Son of God, and He is the Image of God, it does not mean that He has to be an exact representation of the Father?
Just tie that to Satan because he is the subject here. He is also a son of God. Satan is an angel, and like all other angels is a created being, and he also qualifies for the title "son of God." Now would you say that Satan, as a son of God, is exactly like God? Most definitely not! Thus again giving strength to the idea that because One is the Image of God and the Son of God, it does not mean that He has to be exactly like God in every detail. Throughout the Old Testament both termssons and daughtersare used to represent anyone having the characteristics of another without any blood relationship intended. Is that clear? We will expound on that just a little bit. In fact, both "sons" and "daughters" are used to represent both genders when a whole population is described as in the term "the daughters of Jerusalem," which includes both men and women; but God there called them "daughters" because of the overall gender of the context in which it appeared. Let us go to Luke 3. Here we have the genealogy of Jesus Christ, and the very last verse tells us:
Adam is specifically designated as "the son of God" because Adam came directly from God's hands. From here we are going to go to I Corinthians 15. I am asking you to reason along with me.
Notice this distinction between Adam and Jesus. I think it interesting that he says, "He is the Lord from heaven."
There we get the word "image" back into the picture again. Can you see a direct connection between Christ being the Image of God and we born into the Kingdom of God, from that point bearing the image of the heavenly? In our bearing the image of the heavenly, will we be co-equal with the Father? Of course not. You should be able to see then that in the Bible's use of "image" it is not necessary for the Son of God to be exactly like the Father in every detail, nor be co-equal either. We are going to go back into the Old Testament again to Hosea. This is a prophecy.
Here we have a statement regarding Israel's future when they are regathered. They will be called "the sons of God." In this case though it is indicating a special place of dignity and sovereignty among the nations. We will get a little bit more of that by going back all the way to Exodus 4:22. In this context God is giving Moses his marching orders. He is just about set to leave his family and return into Egypt, and God is telling him what to say to Pharaoh.
Moses was instructed to designate Israel as God's firstborn son. This is a very great honor among nations. It is never applied to any other nation. If things had fallen correctly, and they had submitted to God, they would have had the characteristics of God as human beings. Now we are going to go all the way back to the New Testament again, to Romans 8 where the term "sons of God" appears once again. This time it is talking about us.
Those begotten by God and led by the Spirit of God are "the sons of God" by faith, and these have become the "Israel of God" in God's spiritual creation. We should be able to grasp then that the term "son of God" all by itself does not indicate absolute Deity. It is a figure of speech derived from human relationships. Now we are going to take this off at an angle because we are going to see that Jesus' uniqueness fits right in here once again. Let us go to the book of Colossians. It was in Colossians 1:15 that Paul called Jesus "the image of God." He is our Mediator. He is the Image of God.
God called Israel His firstborn, but they were the firstborn of that creation. Now we see Jesus designated as "the firstborn of every creature." That word "creature" could also be translated "creation." In order to understand this you have to see it in its entire context, because "firstborn" here does not mean that He was born first. It is talking about primacy, preeminence. He is preeminent in all of creation, except of course for the Father. He is preeminent especially in terms of a special creation. There were many sons of God before Jesus' emptying of Himself and coming in the form of a slave, but He is indeed first in reference to that special creation of which Paul writes. I think you grasp that the special creation of which I speak is that creation in which we are now involved as a result of God's calling. In addition to being "firstborn" (having preeminence) in that special creation, He is the only begotten Son of God. We are going to add pieces to this as we go along.
Here again we see a notation by an apostle, who lived with Him for three and one-half years, of Jesus' uniqueness. Jesus of Nazareth is the only human ever generated in the way He was, thus showing a unique relationship between Him and Goda relationship that nobody else ever born will ever have. We are born by generation of a human father and a human mother. We become children of God by receipt of His spirit. He was the only Son by generation directly from God, thus having the nature of God from birth, and besides that, He had a spiritual pre-existence nobody else ever had. He is absolutely unique. Turn now to John 3:31-35. John the Baptist is the speaker here.
I am going to read that series of verses to you from the Philips Translation, and maybe it will be a little clearer to you.
All of this is emphasizing Jesus' uniqueness. There is nobody in the universe like Him. This is no way diminishes Him at all.
I think that we all have puzzled over this verse, because without a better background of what John wrote, right here it appears to say that Christ was created from the very beginning. If that is so, how can the Bible also say that Christ was with the Father from the beginning, and that the creation was done through Him, thus saying that He is uncreated? He is uncreated. He is not the Father's first creation, and then came everything and everybody else, as some say, but this verse is agreeing with what Paul wrote in Colossians 1. He is the firstborn from the dead, having primacy and preeminence over all who follow Him in this special spiritual creation. But none of this eliminates the fact that the Bible clearly shows that He had a pre-existence as God. If He was not God, how could Paul honestly write under the inspiration of the Holy Spirit that Jesus did not think that equality with God a thing to be held onto for dear life, but emptied Himself, taking on the form of a slave? That is so clear, I do not see how it can honestly be denied. Jesus went from the top to the bottom in one giant step by being born as a man, thus beginning to show man His sacrificing humility. Let us go back again to John 17 again.
Jesus is giving clear evidence of His pre-existence before the creation. This ties directly into John 1:1-5. Let us read that again just to be reminded.
That clearly states that Jesus was God at the beginning; but as we have seen in other places, He was a distinctly different personage from the Supreme God, and subject to Him; but He was still the God of creation. When He took the form of a man He was still in His nature, in His spirit, uncreated God. He is not a super man, nor a super angel. He is divine. He is God, and that is what the angel told Joseph in Matthew 1. The angel said, "You shall call Him Immanuel," which means, "God with us." Why would it say that if He is not God, if He was not God before?
What is being done here? Jesus is being identified as to His reality by Peter, not in the form that He appeared in to those to whom He had not been revealed. The most they would think of Him was that He was a reincarnation of some great human personage from Israel's past. However, Peter identifies Him correctly: "You are the Son of the living God"the only begotten Son. Connect this again with what you know from John 1 in which the apostle John identifies Jesus of Nazareth as the God of the Old Testament. The answer that Peter gives is a parallel of what the apostle John said in John 1, but actually it is more specific. Let us take some evidence from some demons as to Jesus' identity. Let us look at Matthew 4:3at the arch-demon of all.
Satan knew full well who Jesus was. This was a cynical challenge in an attempt to trick Him into sinning. If there was anybody who knew of Jesus' pre-existence, it was Satan.
They knew who He was, and they knew what God's plan was, and they knew the time was coming when they were going to be, at the very least, in prison for all time, and to be tormented in their binding. They knew that He was the Channel through whom God has been working all of these ages. Let us go to Mark 3:11. This is an interesting one.
When it says that they fell down before Him, that is literally what the Greek says. They were actually prostrating themselves in subservience before their Creator.
So here the demons acknowledge what the apostle John states in John 1. Jesus of Nazareth was the God of the Old Testament and the promised Messiah. The demons knew that He had a history behind Him as their Creator, that He was the One John names as the God of the Old Testament who appeared to men, and always represented the Supreme God before mankind. The apostle Paul marks Jesus' special place in a different way, but the way he does it also marks Jesus' uniqueness.
It literally says in the Greek, "the Son of His love". It is pointing out a unique relationship that He has with no other personthe Son of His love. We have already seen that there have been many sons of God from angels and from mankind, beginning with Adam, but not a single one of them is ever noted as the "Son of His love." This is actually repeated in other places that I know that you are familiar with, but we will look at them anyway to make sure that you have your notes on them.
He is the beloved Son in whom God is well pleased.
I want you especially now to turn to Hebrews 1:9. It is good to understand that Paul's point in the whole book of Hebrews is to show the superiority of Christ and of His message to anything that has ever been offered to mankind by anybody at any time; that Christ is superior, that His message is superior, that the covenant is superior, that His death is superior, that He in Himself was superior, and on and on it goes. Nothing can compare to what He is and what He has done.
I want you to note in that series of verses that the following are the things God says about Jesus.
There are at least ten distinctive descriptors of Him named just in these eight verses. There is one more in the book of Hebrews that maybe you never thought of this way.
In this context Paul is using Melchizedek as an illustration showing the superiority of Jesus Christ. Now why would Paul say this about Melchizedek? If you go back to the book of Genesis you will find that Melchizedek appears on the scene in the Bible just "Bang!" with no introduction. He is just there. No genealogy is given for Him. There is no note of His death made either. Paul is saying that the same description fits Jesus Christ: no beginning of days, no end of life, but He abides a Priest continually. Paul is again showing how superior to the created angels Jesus Christ is. Do angels have a beginning of days? Yes. They are created. Paul is saying that as God, Jesus Christ has no beginning of days nor end of life, but abides a Priest continually. The mention of Priest is in reference to His mediation between God and man. He has always been the Mediator between God and man right from Genesis 1. It is interesting that in Genesis 1 it brings to mind the term "Elohim." It is a plural noun and literally means "Gods." God said, "Gods said, Let us make man in our image." "Let us" is a plural pronoun. So right from the very beginning the Bible is showing that there are two of the God-kind. The Godhead only consists of One. It is not a trinity. It is not ditheism, which is two Gods in the Godhead. There is only one God. The Bible makes that very clear. Jesus is unique. Even though He is of the God-kind, He is not the God. He has a God, and that God is the Supreme Deity. That God is His Father, and the Son is submissive to Him in every respect. He was sent by Him. He speaks His words. He said, "Not My will, but Yours be done." God willing, I will continue this the next time I speak because there is yet much more.
JWR/smp/drm
|