![]() |
||||||||||
After the president's nomination of Judge John Roberts Jr. to the Supreme Court earlier this week, I was curiouswhat does the constitution say are the qualifications of a Federal Judge, or Justice of the Supreme Court? It took only a few minutes for me to find out that it actually says very little. It is so littlethere are so few qualifications in the Constitution about an American judge that I can now read those few pertinent clauses to you, and it will not take much time. So, I am going to read those few clauses from the United States Constitution having to do with judges:
That was the first section of the article that deals with the courts.
This clause basically states their jurisdiction.
This just tells you where they have original jurisdiction, and where they have appellate jurisdiction. Clause 3 is simply that the trials that we have are trials by jury. Section 3 in Article 2 also deals with treason. That is it for the whole subject of the judiciary covered in the United States Constitution.
That is it. I have just read to you all the pertinent clauses having to do with qualifications to be a Federal Judge, and/or a Supreme Court Justice. It is astounding to think that our original documentsthe one that we are to base all our laws and principles ondoes not say very much about the qualifications of a judge. There are no constitutional limits to a justice's age, sex, place of birth, citizenship, education, or legal or judicial experience. It does not say anything. You know how it tells you that a senator must be 30 years old, or the president must be 35 years old? Well, it does not even say that for a judge. He could nominate a two-year-old if he wanted to. He could nominate a 2 year old who is also a citizen of Brazil (or any other country) if he really wanted to. There is no constitutional authority that says he must do otherwise. Now, I have looked on the internet, and was searching out qualifications for the supreme court, and found this from CNN.com. It is called, "Confirmation explainer." They are trying to let us know the process. This was one part of it:
So, because of the lack of constitutional limits (qualifications, or whatever), the American Bar Association has stepped in and has made certain criteria available to the justice department, and the judiciary committee of the senate. And, what is really surprising is that over the last 216 years, this system has worked pretty wellthis lack of qualifications. Most of the presidentsmaybe allhave done a fairly good job of appointing nominees. I cannot say that it would be 100 percent of the time. There are a good many of them that have been appointed thinking that they would be one way, and they turn out to be another. Justice Suttor was thought to be fairly conservative, and turned out to be fairly liberal in his judgments. Justice Stevens is the same way. They were appointed by either Mr. Reagan or the first President Bush and have not turned out the way those presidents thought they would. Sandra Day O'Connor is another one. One write-up called her "Swinging Sandy," because she was always the swing vote. She was always on the winning side. Did she really have an ideology that she used to think things through? Basically, the answer in the article was "no." There was no discernable ideology to her. But, overall, it has been fairly successful. We have not had too many terrible things happen, except for the degradation over time. And, they have allowed certain things that should not have been let in. Be that as it may, most of the justices despite their political leanings have decided cases in what they felt was the best interest of the nation. Now, one of the jobs that we are in training for, as true Christians, is to be judges. Yet, unlike the United States Constitution, the Bible, which is our chief document, specifies the qualifications of Godly judges in very fine detail. So, you could say that we are in the process of being confirmed to our positions as judges right now. We are in the midst of our confirmation process. So, my question today is: "Are we meeting the qualifications to be just, Godly judges in the Kingdom of God?" And the title that I have given my sermon today is just that, "Qualifications of a Godly Judge." Let us begin in I Corinthians 6. To me, this is the logical place to start, because it is so plain. If you will remember your chapters, I Corinthians 6 is about "Judging among Brethren." We will read the first five verses:
Now Paul is castigating them, obviously, for being very poor judges. And, for not taking it upon themselves to judge matters between themselves. Instead, they are going out into the world and getting themunrighteous peopleto arbitrate for them. Actually going to law (going to court) against another brother in Christ. Paul is simply saying, "Look. It is our job to judge. It is our job to learn to judge. Do you not know that in the future we are going to judge the world, (meaning other men), and do you not know that we are going to be part of the judgment of angels (bad angels). Do you not think that if that is the case, then we should be preparing for that?" That is basically Paul's tone. "Should there not be someone wise among you who could at least step forward and help you judge these disputes?" Now the commentaries are all over the place on this section. I think that the reason for that is many of these commentators just do not want to admit the implications of Paul's teachings. But, what Paul said is very plain. The saintsChristiansyou and methe Sons of Godwill judge the world and the angels. We are being prepared for something very big. And, it has to do with judgment in part. Now, some of these commentators say that Paul, here, was being sarcastic, or ironic. Like he was saying, "Oh, some of you have said that we are so good, that we are going to be judging the world. You know, we are so wise." And, he is turning it back on them saying, "Well, do not you know that we are going to judge the world? Is not there somebody there who can even judge among the brethren?" Well, it does not seem that way to me. Paul seems very serious, here, because there were very serious problems at Corinth. He was trying to correct a big problem, and he was using thistheir goalagainst them, and saying, "Look! You are failing in your preparations. This is what we have got ahead of us. Why have not you started preparing for this great job?" And so, he tells them, "We will judge the world. And we will judge the angels. So, let us get going. Learn how to judge." Now, what are the implications of Paul's teaching, here, that these commentators, mostly Protestant, are so afraid to admit? I found four implications of this, and I want to go to the scriptures first so that you can see the general gist of the scriptures, and then I will tell you about that implication. For the first, I want to start in Daniel 7. I want to go through all these scriptures and then I will wrap it up into each implication. Daniel 7:26-27 is a prophecy for the future. He is talking about the horns, and the kings, and the one who speaks pompous words, and the aftermath. Verse 26:
So, what we have here is the Kingdom is given unto the saints. And then, it immediately switches to Jesus ChristHis everlasting Kingdom. OK, the next one is Matthew 19, verse 28. Peter has just asked a question, "What is in it for us?"
Move on to Revelation 5:10. Most of you know this one by heart. This is part of the New Song that is sung by the 4 living creatures, and the 24 elders:
Now, on to chapter 20, verses 4 and 6. John says:
When Christ returns and sets up God's Kingdom, the saintsthe true followers of Christ, the children of God, the Sons of Godwill be kings and priests. This is the basic idea that we come away with in these scriptures. We will be given thrones, and positions of great honor and responsibility. We will be given dominion, rulership, and as it says here in verse 4, powers of judgment and priestly powers as well. It mentions specifically that we will be kings and priests, and as I have said several times before in other sermons, the primary job of both king and priest is judgingdiscerning between what is true and false, right and wrong, and what is holy and profane. So, I am sorry, we will not be strumming harps on a wisp of a cloud in heaven, but we are going to be hard at work governing the world to come. It is going to be something that will take much effort. That is the first implication. We are going to be kings and priests. We are going to have the responsibility to judge the world and angels. We are going to have great powers entrusted to us. Number twothe Second Implication. We have many scriptures here. Let us start in John 17. (I have got these in biblical order, so we should be able to march right through them.) Verses 20-24:
I want you to notice all those "that we may be ones" in there. Now, I Corinthians 15:22. This is the resurrection chapter.
Then, drop down to verse 45:
Ok. I am just going to leave that one as is.
Please turn to Ephesians 5:29-32:
Please turn to Colossians 1:18:
Move forward to I Thessalonians 4:17. (I just want you to get the gist of all these scriptures because this is a major implication, here.)
Please turn to Hebrews 2. This may seem a scattering of gun-shot, but they all have basically one particular theme.
Move forward to II Peter 1:1-4:
Move forward again to I John 3:2:
Please turn to I John 4:17:
Jump to I John 5:20:
And now, into Revelation, chapter 14. (I know that this is a lot. Maybe I should have started in Genesis, and just read the whole thing!) I want you to see how often this is in the Bible, especially the New Testament. But, it is an implication that commentators do not seem willing to acknowledge and accept. Verse 1:
And now, for the last set of scriptures, turn to Revelation 19:7-9:
Many verses we have read here! But, what I wanted you to see, here, are several things, but they are all tied together in one theme. Born again humans do not become angels, but become like Christ is Himselfthe Word of God. Simply: Those who arise in the First Resurrection have a special oneness with Christ to the point that they are in Him, and He in them. They are the body, and He is the Head. To put it another way, the saints are the Virgin Bride of Christ, who are joined at the hip with their Husband; and she participates in all of His activities. How many times did we see where it says something to the effect of, "They will always be with Him," or "wherever He goes they will go too." This is an implication that they are really not willing to accept. They might see it in so many words, literally. But, when it comes to this passage we were in in I Corinthians 6, they are not willing to reach the conclusion that we are going to be involved in all of Jesus Christ's activities, which includes judging, making war, ruling, and being High Priest, among other things. They do not want to give manconverted manborn again manthat honor, even though it is very plain that that is what is going to happen. We will see Him as He is! Because we will be just like Him! Obviously, I threw in (so you can understand) Colossians 1:18, "He has the preeminence in all things." He is the head. I do not want anybody to come back and say that I am saying that we are going to be very God with the same authority that He has. That is not what the Bible says. But, we are going to be so linked with Him that much of His power and authority will devolve upon us to do the jobs that He gives us to do, because we are the Bride. He gives the Bride various responsibilities in the Kingdom. It is very clear. Now, the Third Implication. Please turn to Matthew 6:33.
I am using this because this shows us what we are supposed to be doing. Please turn to Luke 6:40:
Do you see the gist of where I am going, here? Please turn to John 14:21-23, part of Jesus Passover sermon:
Alright. Please turn forward again to Romans 12:1-2:
Please turn to II Corinthians 7:1:
Just a few more. Hebrews 13:20-21:
And the last one, here, II Peter 3:18:
So, what is this implication? Remember in one up above, I said, "Sorry. We will not be strumming on harps. It is not going to be a time of ease and doing nothing." Well the same is true of the Christian life. The Christian life is not one of passive waiting for salvation and glorification. But, it is a life of active, even strenuous education, practice, correction, and maturing; and it is all aimed at replicating Christ's life and character in us. That is why we are here. That is why God called us; and then gives us so many years before He actually glorifies us. Because, there is something that needs to be done. It is not just justification that saves us. There is a measure of salvation in that, but there is a great deal more beyond that that we have to learn in this life. If it were not that way, why did Jesus Himself have to live on this earth? It is because He came to show us the Waythat is, the way to live. He is the Way, the Truth, and the Life. We have to put Him on so that our character matches His character. Now, we are not just going to absorb that through justification. There is an imputation of righteousness, but all that does in its most basic form is allow us to come before God the Father, and start to have a fellowship with Him. We can have a relationship with Him because we have been justified. The blood of Jesus Christ covers our sins, and therefore we can go before His throne and begin a relationship with Him. But, there is a great deal more after that that needs to be done.
Guess who He is? That is the goal, and so the implication is that this Christian life is full of the process of sanctification. We must become holy. We must put on the righteousness of Jesus Christ, the new Man. And it (the sanctification process) is designed to prepare us for what is coming, which is far more important. And if we are not prepared for it, we will not be there in those positions. So, this Christian life is very important, and vital to what is coming. The Fourth Implication is that Godly judges must meet certain qualifications. This comes right off of the last one. But, I have made it separate. We are in the time of preparation. But, what are we preparing for? What are the qualifications to be what God has set us up to be? I think that this is patently obvious from I Corinthians 6:1-5, that if Paul castigates the Corinthians for using the unrighteous to judge earthly matters, would not God want only the most qualified judges to decide more important matters in His Kingdom? Basically, that is what Paul is saying. If this applies to the church of God, does it not apply in spades to God's Kingdom? I think that it does. So that final implication is Godly Judges must meet certain qualifications. For this, I want to go to II Timothy 2:8-21. This may seem a strange place to go, but it is interesting from the standpoint of the context of II Timothy. II Timothy is probably the last of Paul's epistles. It is basically the last thing that he wrote before his death; written to a young man whom he treasured very highly, and put a lot of his hopes in for the continuance of the church of God. And so, Paul was giving advice to help Timothy along the way. And II Timothy is full of these sorts of things that apply at the time of the end. That is how Paul was thinking. His time of the end was right there. He is giving advice to Timothy, and therefore on to us, about what we can do to make sure that we make it into the Kingdom of God.
Now he is telling you why he is writing these things, and teaching us these things.
I think that you can even stretch that even further.
What I see in this passage between verse 8 and verse 21 is the whole process in a nutshell. If we want to have eternal life and reign with Christ in His Kingdom, we must, as it says in verse 15, be diligent to present ourselves approved of God. In other words, we must strive through hard workstrenuous effortto prove ourselves worthy of our calling. We have been called to be saints (Romans 1). And to be a saint means a holy oneone who is set apart. We have been called to be different. We have been called to be holy. We have been called to be children of God, not just legally, but actually. Now, I am going to be going through some more scriptures because the remainder of my sermon, here, is about this last implicationthis final implication that Godly judges must meet certain requirements, certain qualifications. Turn back to I Thessalonians 2, and here I am thinking of the terms of being worthy. We will read verses 11 and 12. I want you to notice how often Paul mentions being worthy.
Now, that is very worthya walk worthy of God! Back a few pages to Colossians 1, starting in verse 9:
And then finally in verse 28:
I wanted to bring that in because I want you to know that you are not in this alone. I could have gone to Ephesians 4there is also a place in Ephesians 4:1 which specifically talks about being worthy of our callingbut it tells you, there, that the ministry has been given to help you in all of this, "for the equipping of the Saints," so that we will all grow up into Jesus Christ. So, it is not something that we do alone. We have the help of God, and He gives us helps among men as well to give guidance and proper teaching. So, our Christian walkour very lifeas we have seen in these scriptures has to be worthy of God, and Jesus Christ. That is very worthy. How many times in the book of Revelation does it talk about the Father, and the Son being worthy? "You are worthy, O Lord, to open the seals..." And, the implication of these verses which we have just read is that we have to become worthy too. We have to meet certain qualifications. We have to pass the bar of worthiness. That is an almost impossibly high standard of qualification. I say "almost" because, as it says there in verse 12, of Colossians 1, that the Father has qualified us for these things if we continue. We could also go to Philippians where it talks about the work which He has started in you, He will also complete it. So, He is on our side to bring us to this point. I want to emphasize here that we cannot qualify for God's Kingdom by works. Ephesians 2:8-10 is still in the book. We are saved by grace. However, we must work toward putting on the image of ChristHis very characteras if it did. As I said before, a human being does not just absorb the righteousness and holiness of God into his character. It takes very diligent and enduring effortcooperative effortbetween the individual Christian and God. And it is going to take work. That is why there is so much in the Bible about work. If it was not necessary for our development of character, it would be very plain that it is not necessary. But the Bible continually talks about the things we have to do to make us ready for the Kingdom of God. Now, back in II Timothy 2, Paul lists two overall primary qualifications that we will apply to becoming Godly judges. Now, he does not do it in terms of becoming a judge, however he does it in terms of becoming sons of God, and being in the Kingdom of God. But, I am going to apply it to judges. The first one is found in verse 15:
What I want to pull out of here is the phrase, "rightly dividing the word of truth." This is similar to the American Bar Association's criterion of "professional competence." Remember, they have three different criteria that they use, professional competence being one; the second was judicial temperament; and the third was integrity. This is professional competence. In simple terms, do we know our stuff? God, and God's character is revealed to us in only one placethis, His Word. Just as the supreme court justices must base their decisions on the constitution, and U. S. law, and ratified treaties, we have to base all our decisions upon God's Word. However...there is always a however... (In France they called me "Monsieur Mais," or "Mr. But," because the first time we visited the Boyer family, we were discussing the way things were going in the church of God, and they had certain questions, and my dad would give them an answer, and I would say, "but." There was always another side to it, or a different angle, and so I got that reputation among them, and they called me, then, Monsieur Mais.) However, sometimes the decisions are not immediately clear, even from God's Word. We have toas Paul says heredivide the text. That is, we must cut straight through it. That is actually the imagery that is behind the phrase. So it is as if you were in a wilderness, and you were cutting a road straight across ityou have to go straight through. You have to cut through all the other things, and go straight to the heart of the matter. So, we have to be able to discern from God's Word, here a little, and there a little, what a Godly decision would be for whatever situation we happen to be in. You know that the Bible could not put a "thus saith the Lord" for every contingency. So that means that we have to learn how to apply biblical principles if a specific law cannot be found. So, this means that you have to know your Bible. That is why in the King James Version of the Bible, this particular verse (II Timothy 2:15) starts with study to show you are approved. It really does not say study in the Greek. However, they understood that what it meant was that you had to be diligent in studying the Word of God, and knowing your stuff. Now, this is not a new thing with Paul. Let us go back to Exodus 18. It goes back all the way to the beginning of the book. This is the advice that Jethro gave Moses, because Moses was standing out there judging the people all day, and had no time to do anything else. It was really wearying him. Can you imagine if you had to judge the cases generated by 2 million plus people! You would be up early, and to bed late, if at all, judging all these matters.
That was the situation in the wilderness. And now God makes provisions (in Deuteronomy 17) for how it would be when they have a king over them.
Now, these passages show that Godly judges, whatever their situation, are to base their judgments on God's law. That is what I want you to get out of this. Moses and his judges had only a few books of law. Moses had only written so much at that time. But, we have 66 books from which to base our judgments. Any one of which may have a nugget of truth that applies to a particular situation. How well do we know our law book as judges? I am not saying that you necessarily have to quote scripture and verse, but, you have to have a general idea of where to go when something comes up. This is why we have to study and pray, and exercise God's Spirit in us in making Godly decisions. Oftentimes, you can study, and study, and study, and still not figure it out, but you go to pray, and God will put an answer in your mind, because what you are doing is applying God's Spirit to the problem in communion and fellowship with God, and He is happy to supply the answers. Now, I am not saying that it will happen every time, but it often works together. Study, prayer, and meditation, with occasional fasting work together to learn the book better, and learn how to apply the laws, and statutes and judgments, and all the principles that are found in this book. So, how well do you know it? David had a wonderful attitude about it. Let us read about it in Psalm 19. He came to the real gist of the law.
Now many of us think that we are not very wise. But, it says right here that the testimonies of the Lord, because they are sure, will make us wise, even if we are pretty simple. All was have to do is learn them, and apply them.
It will give you enlightenment, and greater intellect, and depth.
We can avoid situations if we know God's law. And we know that if we keep God's law properly, there is a great reward in it, now and in the time to come.
Did we not read in several places, there, that that is what we are working toward, being blameless?
The law is a great help in putting on the new man. And, it is a great help in learning how to be a Godly judge. Now, the second qualification from II Timothy 2 is found in verse 21:
What I am getting at here is cleansed from dishonor, or sanctified and prepared. Now, I have linked this one with the American Bar Association's criterion of integrity. But, it is exceeding superior to just integrity. Let us go back to the book of Deuteronomy, this time chapter 16. There is a short section on judges, here, in verses 18 through 20. Remember, these were judges in physical Israel.
Now this one has a bit to do with following God's Word, but the emphasis, here, is on the character of the judge. He is to be just, fair, equitable, and that he be not perverted, or corrupted in any way. So, Godly judges are required to have unimpeachable character. They are not just to be good people. (Evidently, this John Roberts Jr. is supposed to be a pretty good guy. Many sing his praises. He seems to have done everything right as far as this world is concerned.) We are not to be just good people. We are to be holy people, holy judges. Remember, this is the essence of our designation by God as saints of the Most High. We are a holy, different people.
I wanted you to see that we have been chosen to be holy and without blame before Him.
So, this is the goal that we should be perfectly holy and without any corruption at all. This is the goal that we are striving for so that when we do become judges in His Kingdom, we will never be swayed from the way that is right, from the truth, from the Godly way. So, until we begin putting on holinessthe virtue that describes God's righteous transcendenceHis infinite difference from all other beings in this universeuntil we come to that point, we are not quite ready for the job He has waiting for us. He wants us to be holy, and without blame, without any form of corruption in us. Finally, let us go to John 7. It is always good to bring it back to Jesus our example. In John 7:24 we have a command from our Lord, and Savior Himself about our responsibility as judges:
Now, how do we do this?
This is a very good motto to have when you are faced with any sort of decision. You can learn to judge with righteous judgment if you seek not your own will, but the will of the Father in Heaven. So, back to my original question: How are our spiritual confirmation hearings going? Just as Paul wrote, "And if the world will be judged by you, are you unworthy to judge the smallest matters?" How prepared are we, right now, to judge according to God's righteousness? I will let you answer that yourself. RTR/rwu/cah
|
You Will Only See This Once | ||
|
The Bereans "received the word with all readiness, and searched the Scriptures daily to find out whether these things were so" (Acts 17:10-11). This daily newsletter provides a starting point for personal study, and gives valuable insight into the verses that make up the Word of God. See what over 40,000 subscribers are already receiving each day. |
|
We respect your privacy. Your email address will not be sold, distributed, rented, or in any way given out to a third party. We have nothing to sell. You may easily unsubscribe at any time. |
||