![]() |
||||||||||
One of the things that gives me a small measure of frustration during the scattering of the church is peoples' insistent claim that the only thing that identifies the true church is that it is preaching the gospel of the Kingdom of God to the world. I have heard this so many times that I have lost count on it. It may not be said in exactly those words, but that is what it amounts to. I understand that this claim is a hangover from our days in the Worldwide Church of God [under Herbert Armstrong], when he was pressing so hard to accomplish the work that God gave him to do. As I begin this sermon I want to assure you, categorically, at the very beginning of this message I am not against preaching the gospel of the Kingdom of God to the world. It is the intensity of the focus on it, at this very critical time in the history of the church [to the detriment of other things that need to be done], about which I am concerned.
I don't know whether your Bible is divided up into paragraphs, but mine is, and the heading on this paragraph is: "The Great Commission." This indeed was Herbert Armstrong's work under God. I have no doubts and no regrets about Herbert Armstrong's role. But I do think that it needful to point out a couple of things in regard to this verse. In Matthew 24:14 is another perhaps equally well-known scripture.
Matthew 24:14 is not a commission to anybody in particular; not to the first-century apostles, nor to Herbert W. Armstrong. It is simply a statement of fact [by Jesus Christ] prophesying that the gospel will be preached in all the world as a witnessand then will the end come. What I am saying here is that Matthew 24:14 and Matthew 28:19-20 are not synonymous. In Matthew 28:19-20, though preaching as a witness is included within the scope of the commission - it is actually placing more emphasis upon the entire process of conversion, feeding, growing, and the overcoming functions - than merely witnessing as in Matthew 24:14. The key word here is "process." The word, teach in verse 19, is the key to this understanding. My Bible again has a marginal reference beside the word teach, and teach is more correctly translated make disciples. "Go you therefore into all the world and make disciples." This is not that teach is wrong as long as you understand that teach means a process. All [the] teaching required to make a disciple doesn't take place merely in making a witness. There are major differences between the two. At best, preaching the gospel to the world begins the process of teaching. Disciples are created through steady feeding, a believing response in those who hear, combined with overcoming. The second factor is in verse 20, where it says: "Teaching them [the disciples that had been made] to observe all things whatsoever I have commanded you." The key here is the words "all things." That cannot be done merely through a witness. As we are learning, that is a life-long project requiring the structure of a church. This, brethren, is the reason why the church exists. What is being emphasized in verses 19 and 20 [though witnessing is included in it], is the feeding of the flock because it is the called, the electGod's childrenwho are God's greatest concern. These are the ones who are being prepared for the Kingdom of God. It takes a lot a feeding and experiences with God, for Christ to be formed in us. Let's consider something that Paul wrote to these people in Romans 1:15.
All of Paul's letters [with the exception of the Pastoral Epistles and Philemon], were written to congregations of already established converted people. Rome was no exception. The church was already formed there. They had a congregation - a group of Christians who were being made disciples already - and Paul wanted to go to them. Why did Paul want to go to them? For them to be converted? No. To continue the process of conversion. And how was he going to do this? By preaching the gospel to them. He was going to preach the gospel to already converted people.
This congregation was already so well-established that other people in the world [and I am assuming here that what Paul meant was the world around the Mediterranean Sea] had already heard of the faith of the converted people in Rome. It must have been outstanding for him to make a statement like that; but nonetheless he wanted to go there and preach the gospel to them. A question: Doesn't that show us that it is the responsibility of the ministry [the pastors of the church, including the apostles and evangelists and local elders], to continually preach the gospel of the Kingdom of God to the church? Because that, brethren, is the source of our spiritual strength - our faith.
Don't be misled by that word established, because it can give you the idea that they were not already established. Yes they were already established. The next verse though explains what he means.
The Apostle Paul is talking here about "feeding the flock." He is talking here about preaching "all of the counsel of God" in infinite detail. The words of Godthe gospelwhen we understand it in its broadest sense, includes the entirety of the Bible. It is not confined to things that are just about making a witness so that people might have this held against them in a legal matter by God; "I gave you My word, but you didn't respond to it" sort of thing. God's real concern, His primary concern, is for the preparation for His children so that He might share a relationship in fellowship with them for all eternityeverybody living exactly the same way. So we're talking about something here that requires an infinite expansion on the bare basics [that bring us to conversion] so that we can see the application of God's way of life in every situation possible in our lives. What I have just said in no way means that Herbert Armstrong neglected the "feeding of the flock" aspect, only that the "preaching of the gospel to the world" was so emphasized in his announcements, his letters, his sermons, and his articles. The ministry's announcements and Holy Day offering sermonettes gradually and subtly [over a period of many years], gave the appearance that the "preaching of the gospel to the world" was all that mattered. Having thought about this in preparation for this sermon, I've come to see that there is a distinct tie [in this that has occurred to us], that is a hangover from this world's approach. Their emphasis is on getting a person saved and it's thought by them [by a large majority of them], that once the person professes Jesus Christ, that the salvation process is over. I understand that I am generalizing here, but at the same time what I am saying to you is generally true. And from that point on, little emphasis is placed on "going on to perfection." It's just, "Get the person saved. Get him professing Jesus Christ." The person is justified, and then he's kind of left to hang out to dry. But there is a long way [to go] between being converted and being prepared to be in God's Kingdom. It takes an awful lot of preparation to get us to that point. Let me show you contrasting Scriptures, both involving the Apostle Paul.
I think that Herbert Armstrong had this same feeling in him [that necessity was laid upon him] and there was within him a constant sense of urgency - he had to get out there and he had to do it. In II Corinthians 11:27-28, Paul is telling us of the great number of sacrifices, difficulties, trials and pains that he had to go through.
"Woe unto me if I preach not the gospel." But on the other hand, "the care of the churches" was on him also constantly. My personal thought is that Herbert Armstrong did a fine job in providing for the feeding of the flock, but his public persona was always focused on and emphasizing the one responsibility [preaching the gospel to the world], to the detriment of the other [feeding the flock], as though it was an afterthought. Please understand, I'm not saying it was an afterthought to him, because he did provide for us very well. But when he was in public, preaching a sermon, or when he was at a Feast of Tabernacles [or whatever], he almost invariably talked about his trips and about the money-needs for the preaching of the gospel to the world. When I look at what Paul stated in these two contrasting Scriptures, and start to think about how much time he must have spent preaching the gospel, compared to how much time and energy and so forth that was given over to the feeding of the flock [the daily care of the churches] I think that I would decide that the great preponderance of time and energy [that the Apostle Paul spent] was on "feeding the flock," not on preaching the gospel to the world. I say that from a pastor's point of view, because I know how demanding the pastoring of a congregation is in terms of time and energy and effort. When I compare what I have to do with what the Apostle Paul had to do [who had a Mediterranean-wide area to cover, and he had to do it on foot and on boat and those kind of things] he had to spend easily the great preponderance of his time on the congregations, not on the world. Thinking on these things, I asked myself a question: In the long run, what kind of picture does the overt emphasis on preaching to the world give one of God and His purpose? Is God one-dimensional? Is God so limited in creativity that He can only think of one thing for His children to do? Are family's [of God] lives and relationships so stable that nothing ever arises that creates a necessity for something different to be done? Have you ever lived in a human family where things were so stable, the pattern of life never changed; there were never good times and bad? There were never things like diseases that impacted on your family, that you had to contend with and focus your attention on? Never tensions in the neighborhood? Never any circumstances that the family had to deal with because of war, social unrest, economic upturns and downturns or violent weather? Did your father or mother never assign you, as a child in your family, any more than one responsibility? Was the only thing that you ever had to do was to wash the dishes, or to take out the garbage - from the time that the responsibility was assigned - until you left the family to marry and to begin your own family? Was there only one subject in school? Is there only one thing that we have to be trained for, so we just keep doing the same thing over and over and over again? Is there nothing else [in God's mind] for us that requires: analysis, strategy, concern, and the effort of sacrifice and living by faith - to produce growth, create solutions, and to overcome? Is our Father in heaven so one-dimensional that all He thinks about in regard to us [His children] and His purpose, is that we preach the gospel to the world? Brethren, I know that you know the answers to these questions. But if you begin to think on this mantra that I hear so frequently, one is drawn to make or to ask questions of this nature. Today we're going to once again take a look at this subject. But hopefully we're going to look at it from some different angles than in the past. At the same time we're going to go over some familiar territory [along with the new] so that we can have a broader picture of this concern. Why do we need this subject as a sermon topic during the Days of Unleavened Bread? Because brethren, to be reminded once again of the current state of our livesthings that are happening right now.
Now we, like the Israelites of old, are in the wilderness, journeying toward the Promised Land. We're on a pilgrimage. That is why he can address us as pilgrims and strangers. But in our case our pilgrimage is a spiritual one; still there are many similarities between what we are doing and what they did. That is why their story is in the Bible, so that we can understand what we're going through. Brethren, they faced many hardships during their walk corporately, as a body of people, as a nation. They didn't face the same circumstances day after day without end for forty years. We're going to go back and lay a foundation for this in the book of Numbers where a principle is stated for our understanding.
This principle is very clearly stated in verse 18.
The situation changed. The circumstance changed. Who changed it? God did. They were no longer camped. Now they were on the move. God was leading and guiding them through their journey.
Are you getting the picture? God changed circumstances. Sometimes they were camped a long time. Sometimes they were camped a short time. Sometimes God made them move and journey at night. At other times they journeyed in the daytime. God, brethren, kept shifting gears on them. He kept varying their life. They were not facing the same things all the time.
I submit to you that the Church of God [those who have made the new covenant with God] has the same God at the helm as was at the helm of these people who made the Old Covenant with Him, and He is going to follow the same patterns. He is not going to have us facing the same things all the time. Things are going to vary so that we receive a well-rounded education in facing the difficulties of life in preparation for His Kingdom. He is going to shift gears on us. We're going to go a long time maybe in the same gear, but then He is suddenly going to shift gears. Stop. Put us back in reverse for a little while. Then we're going to go forward. He's going to keep us on the ball that way. We have to receive a well-rounded education. Now [during] all these times that took place in between these startings and stoppings, sometimes they lacked food or water. Sometimes they were under military attack. One time they faced what they thought was a prolonged absence of their leader, and so the golden calf incident arose. Another time it was the allurement of foreign women. Another time they had to construct a tabernacle and organize a priesthood. Another time they had to face the fruits of their own rejection of God's command to go up and take the land. Another time they had to cross a swollen river. They had to face the rejection of other people, civil unrest of their own, and finally they faced taking the land. Are you getting the picture? God did not have Israel doing only one thing on their pilgrimage. They faced a multitude of different problems that God either provided or that He permitted, because He wanted them to face these difficulties. I read in a book recently that God majors in suffering. Think about that awhile. Look at the suffering that He put His own Son through so that He would be prepared to be our High Priest and to lead us in the Kingdom of God. Are we any better than His Son? God is going to shift gears on us often. This last shifting of gears was awfully drastic. He wanted them to face the fruits that their choices produced in order that it be written for our instruction "on whom the end of the ages is come." Let's look at another familiar Scripture in Romans 15:4. This needs to be really pounded in our heads, that all these things that the people went through, were written [down] for us so that we [the church] would understand what we're going through.
I wonder how many people who formerly were part of the fellowship in the Worldwide Church of God have given uplost their hopebecause they've been unable to shift gears with God? They are confused because the condition the church is in right now is not conforming to their ideal. There is a principle that we have to battle against that appears in Jesus' teaching in Luke 5:39.
What are we talking about here? We're talking actually about one of those laws of physics that you probably learned in school. It's called "the principle, or law of inertia." Inertia is the tendency to remain in a fixed position or condition. If matter is in motion, its tendency is to remain in motion. It is moving in the direction it presently is in, unless some external force impels it in another direction. If matter is motionless, its tendency is to remain motionless unless some external forces impel it into motion. Jesus is saying that the same tendency exists and is in play regarding the things of Godthe acceptance of truth, and the acting upon it. There is a very strong tendency to hold fast to what one feels secure with. This is what is driving peoples' opinions as to what the church as a whole needs to be doing, even in face of all this splitting [i.e., "Since we preached the gospel to the world in the past, we therefore have to continue to do it, even though God has forcibly jerked the church in a different direction, and different circumstances now exist."]. There are very many people who are unwilling to see that the church has been caused by a benign external forceGodto move in another direction. They want it to continue in the same familiar pathinertia. But things have changed, and the church must adapt, or perhaps [virtually] be destroyed. We know that "the gates of hell will not prevail against the church," so it's not going to be destroyed. It won't be destroyed because God is on His throne, and He's merciful, and He'll get us turned around. Brethren, look how unwilling the church, as a whole, is to accept the fact that we are the problem. People cannot shift gears to meet the demands of a different situation, and so it has the whole body virtually milling in confusion [with divisive arguments over technicalities], and still dividing. Are you aware that Israel did the same thing in the wilderness? They had a very difficult time adjusting to new situations. It was as though their momentum [picked up from their past experiences], propelled them forward in the same direction, when they should have repented. Instead of opening their minds to a different perspective and going in a different direction, they just kept wanting to go back to what they were familiar with and had learned in Egypt. They couldn't let it go. This is what I am talking about. We should be able to adjust to a new situation. I'm talking about the church as a wholethe greater church of God. We should be able to recognize the patterns that are given in God's word [about where the cause of the problem is], and look there for what God has recorded for our admonition, learning and instruction and then adjust. Let's take off in a little bit different direction. [It's still part of this same inertia that we have going.] Through the years, we've heard the mantra so frequently, that the term "work of God," is automatically thought of as "preaching the gospel to the world." It's just a reaction that has been ingrained within us. But, brethren, that is not what the Bible presents as "the work of God." In Genesis 1:26 we see an overview of what God's work is.
Brethren, that is "the work of God"making man in His image. God is reproducing Himself, and He is assisted by Jesus Christ in doing that, and by us [to a lesser degree] through our submission to the purpose that He is working out. God is Creator. He is making man in His image. God is creating children in His image. He is reproducing Himself. Let's look at another Scripture that defines [a little bit more specifically] what the work of God is.
God works to create faith in His children, that is in Jesus Christ, because He has decreed salvation is by grace through faith. Faith is absolutely essential, and so He works to create it in us, trusting His Son. Brethren, this is done through feeding the flock. Only a small portion of it is done in the initial conversion. We have to live by faith, not merely profess Jesus Christ. It is necessary that faith be built in us, because our choices are to be made on the basis of faith. In our past history in the Worldwide Church of God, the feeding greatly diminished through the 80's and the 90's. Brethren, it was the weakening of our faith that brought on the crisis in the church. That's where we have failed. It was greatly aided by the rapid growth of Laodiceanism. Laodiceanism is nothing more than a virulent form of worldliness in which devotion to Christ deteriorates, while attention to the world [its ways, attitudes, and conduct] intensifies. Somehow we have [maybe not as a real strong thought, but it is part of our thinking] been deceived into thinking that a Laodicean is lazy, or that a Laodicean is irreligious. Well, look back at Revelation 3. God never accuses them of being lazy. I want you to understand, as I think you well know, that worldly people can be very religious. A Laodicean can appear to be very religious. God never accuses them of being lazy or irreligious. The condition is a matter of insipid devotion to the true God, His Christ, and His truth. Christ's strong reaction to this is because the indifference of Laodiceanism cannot be trusted. Christ doesn't know whether to believe their professions - because there is a great deal of insincerity and hypocrisy - considered essentially mean-spirited to Him [who is the object of their profession of faith] because it's not backed by performance in their attitudes and works. The works are worldly even though they may appear religious. Their high opinion of themselves"I am rich and increased with goods, and have need of nothing"gives a good indication of whom they are really devoted to, and so they profess to be what they are not. That is insincerity. That is hypocrisy, which is brought on by their indifference to Christ. They have a lack of devotion to Christ. So what Christ feels so strongly about is that the honesty and the relationship with Him is very sadly lacking because their faith is so weak. "Preaching the gospel to the world," and "feeding the flock," are more appropriately called "the work of the church." They are responsibilities that God assigns to those He has called. Let's go to Jesus' prayer in John 17:4. He says to His Father:
It was an assignment, and He followed through with it, and He completed it. God certainly is involved with us in these things that He assigns us to do. In that sense, they can rightly be called "the work of God" because He works in us. But they are more similar to duties that He assigns, just like you assign your children duties [to carry out] which will help their development and make family life go smoother. This concept that I've been talking about here is potentially damaging because it presents God, life, and worship [of Him] as being very narrow; it is an activity that very few in the body of Christ are directly involved in. Who was always directly doing the work? Herbert Armstrong was. And maybe there were others besides, but we were out on the periphery at best. This is what I mean by saying that "the preaching of the gospel to the world" responsibility is something that very few of us are directly involved in. All of us are indirectly involved in it [as part of the body], but we are not directly involved in it in the way that we are something else. This has the subtle power to greatly detach us from much of God's creative activity. Turn to Matthew 15:7-9 to continue this thought about worship. The "preaching of the gospel" has the power to detach us from the creative activity of God.
"In vain they do worship Me." Do you know what worship means? Worship means to hold in high regard. It means to venerate. It means to honor. Worship has become so restricted in peoples' minds, [at least out in the public] it is generally limited to something one does for an hour or two once a week. And during that period of time one might have a strong feeling of reverence. However, worship in the biblical sense, is very practical and broad in application - involving all of the activities of every day of one's life. Jesus jumped on these people because they had made the worship of God so narrow. God was being excluded from peoples' everyday lives [every minute, every activity of every day] by the commandments that they were teaching them. The worship of God involves everything we do, every day. We are to honor Him, to glorify Him, to venerate Him in all things. Worship has very broad applications, and that is why the word "commandments" is part of this context, because the commandments of God involve all of our life every day. What we were told was that all we had to do was have our hearts in the preaching of the gospel to the world [i.e., in "God's work"], and somehow we would automatically grow. But now think on this. Responding to the "feeding of the flock" directly involves every member in God's creative work every day. The "preaching of the gospel of the Kingdom of God to the world" is an activity, an assignment from God that only directly involves a very small portion of the body. The closest that we are attached to it is in tithing and praying, and thus the mantra: "Pray and pay." But the "feeding of the flock" [the care of the church] is each individual's responsibility toward God - in his worship of God. In our response to the "feeding of the flock" IS the worship of God. It involves every person directly every moment of every day. In doing that, we are truly involved in "the work of God," which is the creation of Himself in us. I mean actively, directly, personally participating with Him in it. One of the areas [of church life] that the concentration on this issue tends to affect, is to ignore the cause of the present condition of the church. If the cause is ignored, will we ever arrive at the solution? I have found that there are four ideas that people are holding in their minds regarding the splitting. I don't mean that every person holds all four in his mind. It's just that I have heard all four of them from a variety of sources. The first one is the one most frequently mentioned.
All four of these allow people to escape the responsibility for the church's condition, and to justify what they do. Many of them [self-righteously sitting in their living rooms, not fellowshipping with anybody] have somehow convinced themselves that they are doing God's will. Do you know what Pharisee means? Pharisee means separatists. The Pharisees of the first century were "holier than thou" types who separated themselves, both physically and spiritually from the main body of Jewish worshippers in their day. They strained over technical points, and they missed the loving intent of far larger issues. Jesus blasted them. Brethren, the church is an assembly. It is intended for fellowship, despite all its flaws. It's very clear from Paul's epistles that they were all addressed to church assemblies, and that God intends His people ASSEMBLE for worship. Meanwhile the church continues to split. I think that some are making some narrow and dangerous assumptions. I'm going to look at Point 4 first, because I think that it can be dealt with rather quickly. I will state right here that the ministry is NOT entirely responsible for the church splitting. More responsible than other parts of the body? Yes. "To whom much is given, much more is also required." The ministry has been given much, but there is a big difference between being more responsible and entirely responsible.
When we compare this to the analogy that Paul gives in I Corinthians 12 describing the church in terms of a human body the ministry is only one part of a whole. Just one portion of the entire body. The whole is made up of many parts, many of which are in no way part of the ministry. But here in this parable, the ten virgins represent the ENTIRE sleeping church. I want you to think of that in relation to what the church is going through right now. The WHOLE CHURCH went to sleep. The whole church is guiltysome more, some lessbut God's own prophecy says that "they all slumbered and slept." Like the rest of the body, the ministry had never been through anything like this. And like everybody else, we had to have time to figure out what we were to do. I can, in no way, say that we all did it right. I can, in no way, say that anybody did it right, including myself. We all did it in varying degrees of wrongness. In addition to that [just like everybody else in the body], there are good ministers, and there are bad ministers, and there are even false ministers. There are some ministers who seem to be hirelings. I want you to notice in Jeremiah 6 this description of Judah just before God scattered them.
This description of Judah is given just before God drove them into captivity to Babylon. God's pattern [that He shows] beginning all the way back in the book of Genesis 15, is to scatter; to destroy when the iniquity is full. God determines what "full" is, and it might be different for the Amorites than it is for those who have made a covenant with God. But nonetheless, when God judges that they have reached a certain point, He scatters. This description shows that they were filled with iniquity from top to bottom.
A different metaphor, but the same description. Jeremiah could not find anybody that was seeking to really worship God. There is no escaping the overall condemnation that God gives in His word.
SICK! Diseased from top to bottom. You might say, "Yes, this was the unconverted nation; not the converted children of God." But don't forget Romans 15:4 and I Corinthians 10:11 "All these things are written for OUR learning, for OUR admonition." They were written for the church, and these verses [in relation to Israel] show you and me the pattern that God will act according to. When the iniquity reaches a certain point, in order to save us, He will scatter us. We cannot escape His condemnation. The church was sick from top to bottomthe lay membership and the ministry as well. Let's look at the notion that Satan split the church. This is one that looks good on the surface, because we all know that "Satan goes about as a roaring lion seeking whom he may devour." He is an adversary who incites to division. All these things are true, and about these things there can be no disagreement. But there is another side to this coin, and that is"Where is God in all of this?" Is Satan stronger than God? Is God sitting on His throne, helplessly wringing His hands because of what Satan has done to His church? The issue in this argument that Satan has split the church is, not really Satan creating confusion and dividing, but God's sovereignty, God's providence, and God's will. Let's look in Isaiah about some things I will not expound very much on because you know them all. Notice the principle that arises.
Pretty confident, isn't it, that God would control him and bring him down.
Satan was cast out. Who was strong enough to cast Satan out? God, of course.
Who is strongerGod or Satan? Could Satan pull something like this over on Godthe splitting of the church?
God not only has Satan contained, He has all of his demons contained. He's strong enough to overpower all of them, let alone Satan on his own.
Not only is God able to control Satan, but even other angels are able to control Satan, and Satan is bound or loosed as THEY determine. He is not free to do whatever he wants. Turn with me now to Job 1:12 and we will see the classic example.
Brethren, for church members to even consider that Satan did this without God's cooperation is so shallow, that it is entirely wrong. Satan is totally under God's control, and even though he would undoubtedly like to rip us to shreds, he can only do what God directly wills or permits. Our Creator never sleeps. He is never weary. We are the "apple" of His eye. He loves us with a love that we can't even begin to describe or imagine. Nobody is going to hurt His kids unless He wills it, and He's going to set limits. "You can go this far, Satan, and not one millimeter further." Undoubtedly Satan was used, but it was God, our Sovereign Creator, who willed it to occur.
Our problem is to open our mind to what is clearly shown in Scripture, and that is that God is much more deeply involved in what we might consider the sufferings of our lives than we would like to admit. They do not necessarily arise because we have sinned. Sometimes they do; sometimes they don't. Jesus was not guilty of one sin, and yet He suffered. Why? Because God willed His sufferings. Job was not guilty of any gross sins either. Neither was Abraham, nor Joseph, and yet they faced very great calamities which they came through quite well. Regardless of why these calamities come, they are exercises [tests] that need to be overcome. Every teacher gives his students exercises, and tests his students in order to discover how well they are learning the lessons and what areas need more emphasis. Satan is nothing but a dupe in God's hands. He is very cunning. He is destructive. He is angry. He is hate-filled. But you can be sure that he can only go as far as God wills [to use him]. He could never scatter the church without God willing it so.
JWR/smp/cah
|