![]() |
||||||||||
During the Napoleonic Wars, of the first few decades of the nineteenth century, warfare was a human meat grinder. It really hasn't improved any since then. In modern time, we kill more peoplejust in a little bit "cleaner" way. But during the Napoleonic Wars, it was a very personal, up close, bloody business. A main stratagem of general officers was just to throw wave, after wave, after wave of men--at an opposing objective--just simply to overwhelm it, by sheer numbers. In the case of a siege of a walled town, canon fire would make a breach in the wall; and then they would throw all their men at it. But still, during this time of very close combat (even though they had guns, they still didn't shoot very far accurately; and so it was fairly close up work) a lot of the times, after a volley or two, it was bayonet time. And this went into the Civil War time, in our own country. You know the British armyall spit 'n polish, and duty and honor, and discipline. Well, they tried to refine this butchery a bit. Especially in the area of a siege on a walled town, where they had to open a breach in the wallif some officer did not volunteer his soldiers for the job (which was often the case, because it was considered an honor to lead the charge into the breach)the commanding officer, then, would choose a regiment from among the several that he had under his command. And he would title them "the forlorn hope." They were "the forlorn hope." The term, actually, is not an English term. Even though we have words that sound like "the forlorn hope," the word is actually from the Dutch. It's "verloren hoop." And that Dutch phrase means, "the lost band." Now you understand why the Dutch called it that. A soldier, if he was chosen to be part of the forlorn hope, had about a one in ten chance (maybe even less) of surviving the forlorn hope's assault on the enemy's breach. The reason why there was such a high death rate, in the forlorn hope, was that the enemy knew exactly where the attack was going to come. In fact, in some instances, the army on the outside (the besieging army) had been assaulting this one spot for daysor maybe even weekswith canon fire, because they had to open up the wall. They had to make a breach in this wall. And so, here they wereshooting from several hundred yards (or more) awayto try to make sure that this wall came down, at least in one spot. Then they could send their men in, with their bayonets. Thus, the enemy knew exactly where they were coming. And so, the defending general officers would set up crossfire. They would set up their own canons--filled with shot and canister, shrapnel, as well as just regular canon balls. And they would pour fire down into this small area where the forlorn hope was coming. The forlorn hopeto secure the breach and enter the town, and thus win the victory for its side --was a nearly certain death penalty. But the British (like I said-- with all of their duty, and honor, and discipline) considered it an "honor" to die as part of the forlorn hope. At least, the officers did. Now, spiritually, Jesus Christ was our Forlorn Hope. In His bloody death, He secured the breachgiving us access to the Father in heaven. Let's begin in Matthew 27. If you know the subjects of the chapters, then you know that Matthew 27 is part of Christ's crucifixion.
Let's go now to Hebrews 10. We'll begin in verse 19.
I read these two sections to show one of the effects of Christ's death on the stake. What it did was that it rent the veil that kept those who were not welcomed out of the Holies of Holies. And it opened up, as Paul says here, "a new and living way" into the presence of the Father. It is by Christ's blood that we step over that lineinto God's presence. And then His blood also cleanses us from all sin; and we, then, have the opportunity for salvation. Our Savior, Jesus Christ, has done nearly all the work; but we still have a part to play in God's plan of salvation. Not only must we work out our own salvation (as it says in PHILIPPIANS, "with fear and trembling"), but God is also shaping us. We are His firstfruits. He is shaping us into an advanced team to work with Christ to heal the breach. And not just to heal the breach, but to heal it completely. Christ did most of the work in healing the breach between us and God; but there is still work to be done to heal the breach between all of mankind and God. And He has called us (His church, His firstfruits) to play a role in doing that. This is part of the meaning of the day of Pentecost that we are keeping today--that we have been called to assist Him in healing the breach. Now, what do I mean by "breach?" Obviously, the imaginary of the forlorn hope, and what they were trying to do there, is very instructive here. But I want to read a dictionary definition of what a breach is. The dictionary defines a breach as "infraction or violation of a law, obligation, tie, or standard." This makes it a very broad term. Another definition is "a broken, ruptured, or torn condition." [As:] We have a breach between us. That means we have a ruptured, or torn, condition between usin our relationship. Of course, another definition is the one that we used with the forlorn hope. "A gap, as in a wall, made by battering." And then finally, another one that applies here: "a break in accustomed friendly relations." So we have an infraction or violation of a law, obligation, tie or standard; a broken, ruptured, or torn condition; a gap made by battering; a break in accustomed friendly relations. Spiritually, all (except the one about the gap in the wall) apply here. Violating law, obligation, and standards; rupturing a covenant; and having a condition of it being ruptured at the present time; and breaking friendly relations with God are all part of the breach between God and man. Let's go to Ezekiel 28, because the breaches began even before man arrived on the scene. Of course, this is one of the sections in the Old Testament on Satan's fall.
The angel, who became Satan (in the Hebrew, Hillel), began the breaches in the harmonious relationship with God. He was the first to break away, and to cause this breach. And he was accompaniedas we find in Revelation 12by one-third of the angels. They were the ones that were under him, on the earth. It says that his tail drew them. So already now, before man was even created, one-third of the creation of God (what is called 'the sentient creation of God') was in rebellion. A breach between God and one-third of the angels! It says here, in Ezekiel 28, that the "offenses" were iniquity, sin, and violence. In other places, pride is thrown inwhich many call the root of all sin. And for these things, God cast him out of His government. That's what the symbol of the "mountain" is. God cast him out of His mountain, out of His government. Satan no longer is part of the government of God. And then he was confined to the place of his servitudehere on earth. But you see what happens when there is sin. Sin causes God to react violently--to put that profane thing out of His presence! And once that happensonce there is a gap (a breach) between a person and Godthat must be overcome if there's to be any reconciliation. In the case of Satan, the devil, and the one-third of the angels that he drew with his tailthere is no indication in the Bible that there is ever going to be any reconciliation. That breach cannot be healed. And all that God can do to remedy that situation is to eternally imprison those angels and their leader, Satan the devil. It's pretty sadthat they chose, for all eternity, to have a breach between themselves and their Creator. And there's nothing that can be done to solve it. Then men arrive on the scene. We go back to Genesis 3; and we find that immediately there is a breach between God and man.
Guess who is there? The one who originally made a breach with Godnow he is there, to cause more problems.
He's like the canon fire against the walltrying to pound, and pound, and pound until the wall is breached. And he does it through lies, and subtleties, and the influence of his satanic nature.
And this is true; but he put a negative spin on it, that made them think. Well, actually, he put a positive spin on itmaking them think that they would be God immediately, and that this was something desirable, and that God was keeping it away from them.
Now immediately, effects began to show.
Well, immediately, they noticed that they should be ashamedthat they were naked, that they didn't have anything on (in front of this other person), and they were ashamed of it. It's interesting that that was the first thing that registered with thema sexual thing.
Another effect was that they wanted to hide from Godthat they had some dirty little secret that they didn't want God to know. There was some part of their lives that they wanted to put in a closet and not reveal to anyone. And so we can see immediately that the gap between men and God was widening at an ever-increasing speed.
Here's another effect. Now--on top of shame, and secrets, and hiding--there is also fear that comes onto the scene.
That's interesting. Why would you fear because you were naked? I don't know that I have a good answer for that. Anyway, he says, "and I hid myself" [end of verse 10].
And then another effect begins. They start blaming one anotherpointing the finger. Let's drop down to verse 24. It didn't take long for God to pass sentence on them.
God, once again, had to react violently--because of sin. He had to cut them off from Him and from eternal life, which was symbolized by the tree of life. He didn't want them to face the same consequences that faced Satan the devil. (He was already immortal, and he had chosen the way of sin.) Here, this new creation (Adam and Eve) had chosen the way of sin again. But God had an immediate remedy for the situation. He didn't solve it, necessarily; but it was a stop gap measure. That is, death. Mankind can die. And so He blocked the way to the tree of life, so that He could resurrect them at another better time and repair the gaprepair the breach. So, He was able to stop the process from going to its ultimate conclusion, which would have been the same as what had happened with Satan, the devileternal separation from God. And so this violent act of thrusting them out of the garden, and guarding the way back with this flaming sword wielded by an angel, was a good thing. It was kind. It was loving. It enabled Adam and Eve to repent one day, and to have eternal life. So God's violent actions, in these cases, are not evil. They are actually good for mankind. Let's notice God's reasons, here, for doing this.
Now, He repeats what Satan said would happen after they took the fruit of the tree.
That just succinctly says what I just mentioned. What it did was that it opened their eyes. They knew "the good" through God, because that was all that He had taught them. But now they had other avenues of pursuit"the evil" side. They were no longer innocents. They had real choiceto choose, not just what God offered but what Satan offered. And He said, "We've got to make sure that they don't become immortal, until they are ready." And so He closed off the way to the tree of life. Well, it wasn't very much longer until God decided that He had to destroy all of mankindthrough a Flood, saving only eight people. Another breach occurred after the flood. A worldwide breach, I should say. It affected all of mankind. When Noah, and his sons and daughters-in-law, and wife got off the ark, God told them to "be fruitful, and multiply, and replenish the earth." From this, we have understood that part of Noah's commission was to repopulate the earth by spreading the people around. Thus, giving people a lot of elbowroom and letting them go to the lands that God directed them to go in--and, by that means, to have peace. If they had done what God wanted them to do, then our history probably would have been somewhat different. But what happened was that mankind rebelled against this, and the result was the tower of Babel. They didn't want to be put all over the earth. They wanted to stay together.
What this says is that once they left the area around where the ark landed in Ararat, they went somewhat to the east and found a plain that was just "Garden of Eden" like to them (compared to what they knew). And they said--to themselves, and to one another:
Russell brought up something very interesting last week in his sermonette, when he went through this. They possibly could have lined this thing with the asphalt in order to be protected from another flood, which they thought might happen. An interesting thought in this regard is that they were going "down" in elevation. They had been up in the mountains, where they may have felt somewhat safe. (That's where the ark landed.) Now they were going down into the plain, where it was well watered. There they built a tower, a high thing; ad they lined it with pitch, with asphaltso that it was waterproof. Then they wanted to make a name for themselvesmeaning that they wanted all the glory to themselves. That is, to do something apart from God. They didn't want to do it for God's name (which is interesting. Hold that thought in your mind.). They wanted to do it for their own [name, glory].
The thought here is that man being united and having started out like thisin, actually, such a very huge leap in technology and architectureto begin with, would lead to other very large advances in other areas of technology. Soon they would begin doing whatever they thought up. Whatever man's mind could conceive, they would be able to do. All of their brains were on one frequency, and they could communicate their ideas without any hindrances. And God says, "It's not time yet. I don't want this to be able to happen for another five thousand years or so." And we are just getting, now, to the place where we can do that once again. That is, where we've used technology to overcome the barriers of language. You can communicate in computer languages now days. You don't even need speech.
Well, God had His way! His will was done. And even though Noah's descendants had not done what God had said for them to do, God did itby confusing their speech. Some, that spoke proto-Chinese, ended up in China. And some, that spoke proto-German, ended up in Assyria. Those who spoke some of the Indian languages, ended up over in this country. And so on. And God scattered them abroad over the face of this whole earth. This was another event of a breach. Now, remember that I said that they did this to make their own name, or to glorify their own name. Let's go to Zephaniah 3, verse 9, to see where God is going to solve this problem Himself.
God said, "I am going to confuse your language because you would not give Me the glory. And when I restore a pure language, I'm going to make sure that you use it to call upon My name." That's how He's going to restore that breach. (And who knows what language that might be.) Notice the other reason: "That they may call on the name of the LORD, to serve Him with one accord." Unity--exactly the opposite of what happened with the tower of Babel. They were trying to make unity, to become united, through their own meansto give themselves the glory. And God said, "I'm going to give you a pure language, so that you can call upon My name and have the proper unity"that serves God. And when God does something like that, it always works out for the best. Much better than man, whose "touch" tends to ruin everything. Let's go to 2 KINGS, and we'll see another breach. Israel has said, on Mt. Sinai, (in Exodus 19:8) "All that the LORD has spoken we will do." They were agreeing to the covenant. "All that the LORD has spoken we will do." Now notice what happened about seven hundred years later, or so.
This is all that Israel had done, even though they had said, "All that You say we will do." God's reaction is very true to the pattern.
And it is still in effect! They are still away from their own land. They still do not know who they are. Only a very small remnant of people knows where "Israel" is; and this separationthis breachcontinues. You might want to jot down II Chronicles 36:15-21, because God says almost the exact same thing about Judah when He sends them away under the hand of Nebuchadnezzar, king of Babylon. But with them it was slightly different. The breach is still there; but He made a small exception in their case. He allowed a small group (of Jews, and Levites, and Benjaminites) to come back to Judah; and there to raise up the temple once again. And to prepare for the first coming of Jesus Christ, because the Savior must come from Judah and He must have a temple to return to. He must be born "in the land." For all of the prophecies to be fulfilled, He must be born in the city of Rachelin Bethlehem, of Judah. And so, He made an exception for the ancestors of Jesus Christ, and for other people who were necessary for the running of the temple, and for the refoundationing of a small society so that His Son could come (the first time) and do His work. And don't you know that just forty years after that (approximately) God totally destroyed Judah again. That was the beginning of the endof the Diaspora, where the Jews were scattered all over. Or, maybe I should say the end of the beginningof the Diaspora, where they are still (most of them) living outside of the land. Do you know what the Romans did, when they came up against Jerusalem, laid siege to it, and finally conquered it? Well, the temple was covered in gold; and, when they burned the temple, the gold melted. Their greed was so great that they, pretty much, plowed the entire areascraped it cleanto make sure that they got all the gold. It was like God, through the Romans, was saying, "I'm going to just wipe all signs of Judah from off this place!" They took everything. They scraped it clean--even the gold that had melted down between the rocks. A breachbetween God and His people Israel, and then with Judah. Let's go to Revelation 3, because the breaches have never stopped. There have even been breaches in the churchbetween God's people and Him. Here's onemaybe the most famous of them all.
|
You Will Only See This Once | ||
|
The Bereans "received the word with all readiness, and searched the Scriptures daily to find out whether these things were so" (Acts 17:10-11). This daily newsletter provides a starting point for personal study, and gives valuable insight into the verses that make up the Word of God. See what over 40,000 subscribers are already receiving each day. |
|
We respect your privacy. Your email address will not be sold, distributed, rented, or in any way given out to a third party. We have nothing to sell. You may easily unsubscribe at any time. |
||