![]() |
||||||||||
Recently my wife and I saw the movie "Remember the Titans." Many of you have probably seen it yourself. But when I watched it, I was very positively impressed by it. I'm not usually impressed too much by movies. I enjoy them for their entertainment value, but it's a rare movie that makes me really think about other things that might apply. What impressed me was not the details of the situation it portrayed but the overall themes and principles that it illustrated. It was not so much the struggles and triumphs of integrating a high school football program as much as how analogous it is to our Christian life. I don't want to take the time to rehearse the plot. I'd probably bore those of you who have seen it, and I'd give it away for those who haven't. But the over-all subject of "Remember the Titans" deals with the difficulties of integrating two very different groups into one unit. In this instance, the school board in this northern Virginian area decided in 1971 to integrated two high schoolsone all black, and one all whiteinto one. The vehicle to illustrate all the problems that this caused, and the way they worked it out, was to use the football team as a microcosm of not only the school but the way that the town itself dealt with the problem. By naming the film "Remember the Titans," the writer or the producers of the film wanted us to recall rallying cries of years past. We all remember "Remember the Alamo!" or "Remember the Maine." We are living at a time when racial unrest is beginning to bubble to the surface again. It's kind of slowed down since September 11th because terrorism has sort of taken the front burner, so to speak. But these people who made this film wanted us to consider the Titans. Remember the Titans. Remember how, even though they had a problem that they were faced with (integrating a black and a white school), they found ways to overcome it. So the writers or the producers wanted us to think about how two hostile camps--with a little bit of time and effort--could become one, and work together, and accomplish something remarkable. They want us to think that it can happen again, that it can be repeated, and there doesn't need to be the separation. Now, the analogy has an obvious spiritual application to it. First of all, we will see from the Bible how it applied in the New Testament church. Then we will apply it to us, more personally. So I have titled this sermon "Remember the Christians." Please turn to Matthew 15:21-28; and we'll read a little passage that comes out of the life of Christ, where we will be able to see the tensions between the Jews and the Gentiles. I'll be using this tensionthis set of prejudicesbetween the Jews and the Gentiles as an illustration, and show you how it affected the New Testament church.
This was over on the coast. It was predominately a Phoenician, or Gentile, region.
Some might look at this and say that Jesus was just continuing the prejudices of His forefathers against the Gentiles. That would be a very surface understanding of what was going on here. One might even say that His attitude of her was rather dismissive. "I don't want to have anything to do with you." He wouldn't answer her. Then, when He did, He said that He wasn't sent to her or to anyone like her. And then, when she still persisted, He insulted her by calling her "a dog"which was a common Jewish epitaph against the Gentiles. I could probably name to you some epitaphs that we use for other groups. And we would immediately react with offense. It's the same thing that happens with this lady. She could have acted with offense. But I don't think Jesus' attitude was intended to cause offense--nor was it intended to be dismissive of her. He was testing her. He was putting roadblock after roadblock in front of her--to see the extent of her desire, her faith, and her resolve to have this problem overcome by Him. Her attitude was (excuse the pun) dogged determination. She would not give up. Like a bulldog on a bone, she would not let go! She just kept on. Even though He was putting up all these roadblocks and obstacles in her way, she just kept smashing through themwith a great deal of humility, and a great deal of determination and persistence. He was just amazed that here was a womannot an Israelitewho would show such great faith. But all of this is just to show the great divide there was between Jew and Gentile. She knew it. She knew the epitaph and what it meant. He knew it too, and He tested her by seeing how she would react to something like that being thrown at her. She passed with flying colors, but we still see that tension there. Let's go to Luke 4. We haven't even gotten to what would be called the New Testament church time. We are still in the life of Christ, and we are seeing this come out very clearly. This is right after Jesus announced His ministrythere in Nazareth. He gave the quotation there from Isaiah 49, "The Spirit of the LORD is upon Me." Then He said, "Today this Scripture is fulfilled in your hearing." And remember, I said that we are here in Nazareth.
This passage clearly illustrates the Jewish-Gentile poor relations of the time. He was amongst friends here. He was amongst His own--the people of Nazareth. So you would have thought that He would have gotten a good reception from the hometown folks. But He knew that was not to be the case. And He comes out with both barrels, saying here, "I know you're going to reject Me. I know I won't be able to do any works here." And then He gives these illustrations, and this just enrages them! Why? First of all, He was the kid down the street. Let's not forget that. He was the kid that they had all grown up with. And here He was, coming back to their town and saying that He was fulfilling prophecy; and He was comparing Himself to the great Elijah and the great Elisha. He came back saying, basically, "I am that Prophet that Moses spoke about back there in DEUTERONOMY." That was the first thing that got them set off. Here was "little Jesus" from down the street saying that He was their Savior, the Messiah (if you wanted to put it that way). The second thing that enraged them were the examples He gave of who was going to receive the miracles. He said, "That widow lady from out on the coast, who was a Gentile, was the one that received God's favor during that time of Elijah." And He said, "That leper Naaman (not only was he a Gentile, a Syrianbut he was a leper and unclean) was the one who received God's favor during the time of Elisha." And where did that leave them? On the outs! And here was the Messiah (though they didn't accept Him as such) saying that they would be below both the Gentiles and the unclean. That's why they took Him through the midst of the city. That's why they nearly threw Him over the cliff, but He miraculously got away. So, you see, it didn't take much to touch off a great rage and anger in the Jews. All you had to tell them was that they weren't as good as the Gentiles, or that they would be left out and the Gentiles would be allowed inand they were ready to make a mob scene immediately. And, you know, this is exactly what happened. Let's go to Romans 10. This is a combination of a prophecy and a present-time news report. Here in Romans 9-11, Paul was basically telling them the way it was going--and, looking into the future, about the way it would continue to go.
Sure, he wanted Israel to be able to hear the Word of God and to accept it, and to eventually be saved and in the Kingdom of God.
And I'm sure Paul was feeling the same feeling of frustration and depression. Here he was, talking all day long; and his own people weren't listeningweren't accepting it.
Yes, the witness has been made! What is the best selling book in the world? What is the best selling book among Christian countries, in which Israelites are a large part? The Bible! Hasn't that made enough witness on its own?
Notice how far He goes back to show that God, from ancient times, already knew that His own people would not hearand that they would have to be provoked to jealousy by people who would hear. "A foolish nation," he calls it.
Now let's go to Romans 11:11, where Paul sums this up.
Meaning, "Is this rejection final? Just because they haven't accepted it at the first, does this mean that they are doomed forever?"
Meaning, "It's going to work out so well in the end. Everybody is going to be blessed by the way that this works out."
So, what Jesus proclaimed there in Luke 4 began almost immediately to come to pass. It was the Gentilesa people He did not first go tothat heard, that responded, and that eventually formed a great part of the New Testament church. It was the Jewswho had all the background for understanding, who should have known better, who should have been able to say, "Ah, ha. This is it. This is He. This is the One we've been waiting for. Hallelujah! Let's get on the bandwagon and go." But they were the first to reject it. They rejected it so vehemently that they killed the Messenger, and then they proceeded to kill all His messengers. (And isn't it ironic that the apostle Paul was killed by the Gentile [Nero]? It's just kind of funny how all that worked.) This prophecy that we have here in Romans 10-11 shows that the Jews will be among the last converted; and they'll be converted not in the best way--because they are provoked to jealousy. Here the Gentiles are getting all the blessings that should have come to them [the Jews] as God's original people. Now we are getting to a point in this sermon where we have to begin looking at how the Jews and the Gentiles worked together in the [early] church. It wasn't all "fun 'n games" in the church. Let's begin in Acts 1. The apostles themselvesespecially the original 11 or 12 (I guess we should include Matthias in that.)had traveled with Jesus for most of His ministry, if not all of it. So they should have known. Even though He sent them to the lost sheep of the house of Israel, they should have known--by especially the things He said, as well as His approach to some of these things--that it was going to go wider than just the Jews and the Samaritans. I mean, look, He went to the Samaritans quite a bit. He passed through their country and preached. And though they often didn't want to have anything to do with Him, He was still willing to go to them. They were a mixed bag of Jew and Gentile, and whatever else was mixed in there. They certainly weren't pure Jews. So they should have had an idea, an inkling, that Jesus was going to go beyond Judea and Galileeespecially here in Acts 1:6-8. Here He is, just about ready to ascend into heaven for the final time.
I could have gone to the last few verses of Matthew, and we would have seen the same thing. We could have gone to Matthew 24:14, where it talks about "you shall take this gospel to all the world as a witness." There were enough clues there for them to understand that the gospel was not just strictly for the Jews or for Israel as a whole. They should have been able to get it. But there are such things as prejudice and tradition, a little bit of blindness. They had fair warning from Christ that there was going to be more to this than just a ministry to the Jewish people or to the Israelitish people. Now, let's go to Acts 9. By this time, they should really have known it! This was the calling of Saul, or Paul, on the road to Damascus. In verse 10, Saul had already been struck down.
Here was the apostle that was called to do this specifically. He was to take charge of the gospel "to the uncircumcision," as it was later called. This is ironic too. God called an ardent, jealous Jewish manraised and taught in all the traditions of Judaismto take His gospel to the "dogs," to the Gentiles. (He might have thought that his career had gone to the dogs, as it were.) But God sweetened the pot a little bit by telling him that he would also take it before kings, and he would not be lacking in work before the children of Israel. Here was His [God's] chosen vessel to take the gospel to the Gentile world. And in Acts 10, a little bit later God opens up His gospel to the Gentilesthrough Peter, first. Peter was the one who brought it into the church and then handed it off to Paul. But I want to go through this because it's very interesting to kind of read between the lines, to see some of the reactions here. Peter is in Joppa, praying.
Was Peter a hardhead, or something? Did it have to happen three times? Did he not get it the first time--when God said, "Peter, what I've cleansed you must not call common." This gives you an idea of how deeply engrained these traditions were. I'm sure Peter understood that he wasn't being told anything about clean and unclean meats here. He doesn't say that directly, but verses 34-35 show exactly what it did mean. After the third time, it hit him.
God wasn't worried about those animals. He was concerned with people. Only men are made in God's image. Those wild things, and creeping things, and birds of the airthey don't mean as much as people [do] to God. Peter finally got it. He [God] was talking about the Gentiles. Now was the time to go and evangelize to them, and God wanted them to start in the house of Cornelius.
Notice the wording in verse 45. Those of the circumcision were astonished! Why were they astonished? Had they never considered that God would take the gospel to the Gentiles? Were they so tied/bound in their traditions that they couldn't see that God would go beyond their own kind? I think so. They were still thinking nationally. They weren't thinking in terms of Christ's Body. To me it's an amazing thing. We see these words in here; but the flavor does come through that they couldn't believe it. That is, that God would open salvation to the "dogs" (as they looked upon them). There was a great deal of prejudice thereagainst the Gentiles. But they couldn't discount the sign that was there. It was the very same sign that the apostles had manifested when they had been given the Holy Spirit, in Acts 2. They spoke in tongues. And God was obviously manifesting a great miracle here, to finally get it through to them that the Gentiles had the same station under his administration that they did. They were equal under him, in Christ. Let's go to the next chapter. This wasn't over. Just because they saw the sign of the tongues and that the Holy Spirit came, still they had a lot of Jewish Christians to convince.
"How contemptuous! You defiled yourself there in Joppa, Peter. You stayed with that Roman centurion. You ate meals with them. Don't you know that is against the law?" It really wasn't against the law. It was against their tradition. It's just so hard to break through prejudices. Then, in verse 17, we have skipped over a great deal of what Peter says to convince them. He basically retells the whole story from the beginning. He gives them a blow by blow account, so that they would come to the same conclusions that he did.
"Look, God was doing this. Not me! I'm just His messenger. Don't kill the messenger."
But it still wasn't over. This was continuing. Let's go to chapter 13. This was in Antioch. We are now looking at one of the journeys of Paul and Barnabas.
The Jews really didn't want to have anything to do with Paul; but the Gentiles were begging for more.
Paul and Barnabas experienced the same sort of resistance in Antioch, and in other places. Almost everywhere they went where there was a sizeable Jewish community, they met resistance. Some of the Jews, they converted. In some places (I believe it was Corinth) the ruler of the synagogue was converted. But that didn't happen everywhere. Normally it was the Gentiles that believed and the Jews that persecuted and rejected them. It's really an upside down circumstance when you think of it. Here were these Jews (Paul and Barnabas) bringing what was thought at that time to be a teaching that sprang out of the religion of the Jews. It really didn't. It was the original religion of God--but it was considered to be a sect of the Jews. The Jews were the ones that rejected it the most, and it was the Gentiles that accepted itjust as Jesus had prophesied, just as Paul said in Romans 10-11. So their preaching ended up reaping persecution from "the chosen people"--and the ones that were held at arms length in former times rejoiced in it, accepted it, and glorified God for it. Now we can go into chapter 14. There's a great deal in this book in particular, but also through out the whole New Testament, about this very hostile attitude of Jew towards Gentile and back again (Gentile towards Jew).
There's really no chapter break here. There's a break, let's say, in the paragraph; but they are still in Antioch.
Now, here's the same thing springing up again--Jew versus Gentile. They are saying that the Gentiles, to be true Christians, must first become Jews. That is, they must be circumcised.
It got to the point where there was so much debate, so much arguing, so much "unclarity" (let's say), so much fog about this issue that they had to have a church council to decide what was going to be done with these Gentiles. Did they need to be circumcised and become proselytes to be accepted? Or, should they just be accepted "as is," as long as they accepted the sacrifice of Jesus Christ? Basically, what they decided is that they can be Gentiles; and all they have to do is what we do now. That is, to accept Christ as their personal Savior. And they added to this that they abstain from things that were normal Gentile idolatrous practiceslike the eating of blood and certain sexual things, eating animals that had been strangled where the blood was still very much on the meat, and stuff like that. The prohibitions that are given at the end of James' speech, there in verse 29, were just (in a way) reminders that they were supposed to lead a life of integrity according to normal Christian rules of conduct. They wanted to emphasize these certain things because they were particularly rampant among the pagan Gentile religions at the time. So they are just making sure that the Gentiles understood that they were distinctly Christian, and could not revert back to Gentile practices. They were still to keep God's law; but they didn't have to become Jews to do it. And what really drove the knife into this dispute, at this time, was that James himself agreed totally with Peter. Remember, Peter was the one that had been the first that God approached (after Paul)that the Gentiles could come into the church. Peter, as the leader, was the one that brought it into the church and announced it to all. But James was known, in the church, as the leader of the Jewish Christians. That is, the ones who were most wrapped up in the law, the ones who were holding the law closest to their chest. When James said that theologically Peter and Paul were right, this drove the knife into the whole argument. Now that James was on their side, as it were, there was no more "energy" on the other side to do much to get it changed back. And it was the right decision, obvious. Here it's recorded in the Bible. But, even after all of that, it didn't end there. There was still more to come. Let's go to Galatians 2. Some of the chief people, who were involved in this, had a relapse of Judaism; but Paul never did. Paul never shrank from anything. He writes very forthrightly:
Notice that these "certain men came from James." They were the ones that were thought to be the law-abiders within the church, or the ones who pushed the law.
I can just imagine Paul going up jaw to jaw with Peter, and telling him off. What he did was he publicly denounced Peter's sin for everyone to see. He shamed him publicly to show that he was playing the hypocrite. I looked these words hypocrite and hypocrisy up, and they are two different words; but they both mean the most evil form of hypocrisy. They had said with their mouths that they believe the way Paul did, but they said with their actions that they did not. That's hypocrisy if there ever was any. So Paul makes a very public display of this, and lets them know that they were in the wrong. The reason he did this was because of what it says there in verse 12. They withdrew and separated from the others. Their actions caused division within the church, and that's the worse sort of thing that could happen--this Body of Christ, divided. So Paul thought, if any time was the right time, this was the best time to nip such a thing in the bud. Even though it was Peter, he didn't flinch from doing it. The guy had a lot of guts! Now, I don't want to give the impression that it was all from the Jew's side. Let's go back to Acts 16. I want to show that the Gentiles were not 'without fault' in this. It was not all one sided. This was in Philippi. (By the way, the "we" and "us" in these verses mean that Luke was with him at the time.)
Then they were sent to prison. So, here we see just one small vignette of Gentiles reacting against the Jews. Silas was probably a Hellenistic Jew, and Paul certainly was a Jewand very obviously a Jew; and they made a point of it when they made their accusation, to call them Jews. And this didn't hurt their attempts to get the city against them. This wasn't the only time. Paul was mocked in Athens. He was called "a babbler," as it reads in the New King James; but literally they called him a "seed picker," which basically means that he picked up a bit of philosophy here and a bit of philosophy there. Then he put them all together into what he thought was a very whole philosophy of life. (They would have probably thought Herbert Armstrong was the same way. They accused him of taking this from Mormonism, and this from Jehovah Witness-ism, and this from Seventh Day Adventist-ism, and other things.) But that's what they called Paul in Athens. In Ephesians he was dragged before the entire city and nearly lost his life because Demetrius, the silversmith, accused Paul (again) of dealing their economy a blowmeaning that no one was going to go to the temple of Diana, and no one was going to buy the silver trinkets that they sold. Paul nearly lost his life there. And of course, as I mentioned before, a Gentile Emperor (mad Nero) eventually killed Paul. So it wasn't just the Jews who were against all this. It was the Gentiles as well. Now we are going to go to a strange place to find out how this all came together. Let's go to Revelation 2, and we'll see Jesus' own evaluation of these peoplethe church as a whole, as He saw it over this whole period of time. Of course, we are going to be reading the letter that He wrote to the church of Ephesus. This will kind of give you an idea of the overall state of that church.
Generally, I think that all in all this was a fairly positive evaluation. They must have begun to work together(1) the Jews who remained converted and (2) the Gentile that remained converted throughout this time. Jesus says here that they did works. They were patient. They were not afraid of labor for Him. They were very sensitive to evil, and they were quick to get it out of the church--especially in the form of people in authority who were teaching them the wrong way. That is, "those who say they are apostles, but are not." They did have the problem of leaving their first love. I don't have time to go into that; but I think that, over time, they lost their focus. Even so, I think that overall they were a pretty good church. Evidently they were able to lean upon one another and to get through the tough times, because they lived through some pretty rough persecutions towards the end. They lived through the death of all the apostles, except for John (who probably outlived them all). Even so, it ended up that they were able to pass the torch on in fairly good shape, to the church in Smyrna. So, evidently they did triumph. They were able to get over the prejudices that they had, to be able to work together. And this evaluation from Jesus Christ is, like I said, fairly good. But let's go to Ephesians 2, because I don't want to just leave this at the first century. I want to have us see it more personally. He's writing this to the church, remember, that was raised amidst that hullabaloo that I just mentioned about Demetrius the silversmith. They had a problem there in Ephesus with the two sides coming togetherJew and Gentile. He's speaking [here] directly to the Gentiles because, evidently, the church there in Ephesus was predominantly Gentile.
This leaves them way out in utter darkness almost, as far as God is concerned.
Notice his argument here. He says that there were two camps. There was the camp of the circumcision, and there was the camp of the uncircumcision. Maybe, as an illustration, you could say that there were two bodies of water; but they were divided by a split of land that went between them. These waters never touched. But it was the blood of Christ that came and dissolved that split of land between them. And the two campsthe uncircumcision and the circumcisionwere designed, by that act, to float together and to become one new body of water. He keeps repeating: one body, one spirit, one new man. And by taking down that split of landthat wall that separated the two of themit was designed to produce peace. They no longer had these prejudices to keep them apart. Some of the laws that were given back in the Old Testament made Israel seem so separate from the Gentiles. And He took that away, when He took away the old covenant. The new covenant allows everybody to mix togetherlet's say, in that one body of waterand become one people (not two). He also uses the illustration of one temple. They were all to grow up on the same foundation into one temple. Not many temples (not all of these different sects), but one true church--which we know as an organism that makes up the Body of Christ.
He's saying, "Look, everything is unified now. There is only one. There are not two camps. That's gone. That's been done away with. Now there's just oneone of everything. And we all share it."
What he is saying here is, "Yes, there are individuals that are given certain things to do, within the church."
Now once He says that"the Body of Christ"He immediately goes on that track:
"Christ" and "the perfect man" are synonymsbecause we are His Body (which he goes on to say).
Yes, we are all individuals; but we are all one Body. We are all the Body of Christ. And we are to grow "into the Head." I almost get this feeling of like a sci-fi movie, where you have this body on the one hand that is kind of amorphouskind of shapeless, kind of gooey and not quite in one body shape. But there's a head there, and that body is in the process of forming and shaping by the help of God the Father to grow up into the headso that it fits the head, and the whole body resembles the head. It can be seen seamlessly, from the top of the head to the soles of the feet, that that is one "being"because it works together, it is unified, and every part does its share. (That's kind of a gruesome illustration, but I hope it puts the point across.) We are in this process of becoming Christ. He's the Head. We are the Body.
That's what we are doing! That's how we become Christ. By putting off all that is wrong and by putting on all that is right and holy. As we do that, we become more and more and more like Jesus Christ, the Head. You can go to Colossians if you like. Colossians 3:9-15 is very similar to the book of Ephesians. They are kind of "sister books," if you want to put it that way. Many of the same themes that are in Colossians have already been shown in Ephesians. There are some differences there, but that's generally true. Indeed, I think I will go there, because there's one phrase in there that we need to see.
This says that the new man is the image of Christ. Listen to this. This is the Body of Christ that we are talking about.
What's Paul saying? It's the same thing that he said in Ephesians. We put away all these distinctions that we call each other. "I'm a Jew. You're a Greek." What does it mean? Nothing! What is important? Christ! "I'm a slave. You're a freeman." What does it mean? Nothing! We are both part of the Body of Christ. We both are an appendage, a cell, or whatever you want to call itin the Body of Christ. Those outward distinctions no longer matter. Or, should no longer matter. We allow them to, because of our human nature. But we are all the Body of Christ; and we have to begin to see each other not as Jew, or Greek, slave, or free, barbarian, or Scythian, or whatever it happens to be. We have to see each other as Christians. That is, as the samewith the same goal, having learned the same things, and growing into the same God. In the movie "Remember the Titans," the white assistant head coach had been, in his own way, quietly resisting everything that the black head coach was trying to get across--specifically the system that he was trying to get the boys to understand and put into practice. Near the end of the movie, there was the big game; and he wants to win (just like the black head coach wants to win). And so he finally puts off his pride. He had been the head coach the year before, and he had been demoted to assistant head coach--so this black fellow could be the head coach. So he finally puts off his pride, and his self-serving attitude; and he submits to the black coach. And he saysnot only to the black coach but also to the rest of the kids (who are about half and half, black and white)something like this: "We've made it through this season because we've learned to see, not each other's skin color, but each other's soul." What he does here is that he admits that their unity came from recognizing that they were all of one kind, with one goal, and one system of achieving that goal. Everything else was a distraction. Everything else held them back from achieving the goal that they were all looking to accomplish. Paul tries to get the same thing across to the Galatians. He says:
Everything else is a distraction. Paul is trying to cut off the head of the monster here that was the prejudice between the Jews and the Gentiles. He does it very effectively in this book of Galatians. Notice how many times there, in this four verse series, that he mentions the name "Christ" or "Christ's." That was the focus! You are Christ's. You have been baptized into Christ. You have put on Christ. You are going to be heirs along with Christ. In this analogy of "Remember the Titans," what Paul is saying is that Christ is "the Coach." We are running His system. Everything else is a distraction. So let's conclude in John 17 and see where that [same] Christ, our Savior, says something very similar. This is Jesus' prayer with His disciples before He was arrested. He says:
There's an interesting point. If we are not unified with the Father (or each other, or Christ) -- is the world going to believe that we have anything to do with the true God? I don't think so.
That doesn't need much explaining, does it? The thrust of His final thoughts about the Church of God is that we be unified in Him. How do we do this? He mentioned that the love that He has [should] be in us. Do you know what that tells me? It tells me that our greatest efforts to produce unity happen inside us. They are internal. The way we blend in with this divine unity is by being one with Christ ourselves personally. IF we are personally unified with Christ (who is personally unified with the Father) and Christ is in us, THEN we are going to be unified with everyone else who is doing the same thing. There will be unity in the church, of those who are putting off the old man and putting on the new. And it happens, not because we get in a hug-fest with each other, but because each one of us is putting off the old man and putting on the new. That's where unity comes from. We are all living by the Coach's system. The emotions will come later. The first thing to do is to live the gospel of Jesus Christ, and we will be unified with everyone else who is also living the gospel of Jesus Christ.
That's the start. God calls us, and we begin to love Him. Now look at what verse 29 says:
Isn't that what Ephesians 4 said? We are all to grow up into the Head. That is our job. We are not here to be linebackers, or quarterbacks. We are not here to be offensive linemen or running backs like in "Remember the Titans." We are here to be conformers to the image of His Son. That's our purpose. He predestined us to do that.
That Christ is like he is, is only the beginning. Christ wants many brothers and sisters.
That's the point of all this. IF we do this thing of becoming unified with Christ by living His gospel, THEN we will be unified with all those others who are living His gospel; and we will end up where Christ ended upin glory.
RTR/plh/cah
|
You Will Only See This Once | ||
|
The Bereans "received the word with all readiness, and searched the Scriptures daily to find out whether these things were so" (Acts 17:10-11). This daily newsletter provides a starting point for personal study, and gives valuable insight into the verses that make up the Word of God. See what over 40,000 subscribers are already receiving each day. |
|
We respect your privacy. Your email address will not be sold, distributed, rented, or in any way given out to a third party. We have nothing to sell. You may easily unsubscribe at any time. |
||